Sunday, May 22, 2016

Obama and Bathrooms. The Hidden Truth


On Friday, May 13, the Obama administration released guidelines stipulating that American schools must allow biological males into changing rooms, showers, and bathrooms previously reserved for biological females, and vice versa.  Schools that do not comply will be subject to lawsuits and fines. 

I have researched and published on WW II and jihad.  I've had the unfortunate experience of reading of many invaders, unconstrained by any concept of decency, whose only goal was absolute power at any price.

There is a predictable second act after the initial onslaught.  After soldiers have killed enough to win a victory, there is theater.  Evil men on an evil mission stage public displays designed to demoralize the populace.  These displays involve predictable scenarios: children are damaged in front of their helpless parents, who are made to watch.  Priests, rabbis, and sadhus are humiliated in front of their flocks, who must merely stand by helplessly, as everything they perceived as sacred is debased.  Women are raped in front of their husbands, fathers, brothers and sons. 

After the invaders do that, the population is demoralized.  Broken.  Easier to manipulate.

Men want to protect women.  Women want to be protected by men.

The Obama administration's announcement that it will force males into females' private space, where vulnerable, naked, not yet mature girls will be exposed to situations that frighten them, parallels other spectacles where men are demoralized by being forced to surrender their role as protectors of women.  I don't know if Obama planned this.  I do know that this is a minor parallel to major atrocities. 

My male friends express their frustration to me.  They want to protect their wives and daughters.  Male school administrators and elected officials are equally frustrated and increasingly desperate.  My heart goes out to them as they juggle their natural urge to protect against Obama's and society's threats to stigmatize them as bigots and punish them financially. 

I would like to address the transgendered, including one of my loved ones who was born female and now lives as male.  (Love to you if by any chance you are reading this.)

The left is using you.  The left doesn't care about you.  The left cares about taking down Western Civilization.  You are merely the tool, in the same way that they are using Muslims and African Americans and women.  They are using you in the same way that they once used my ancestors, the so-called "white ethnics," the immigrant Poles, Italians, and Jews who arrived in America a hundred or so years ago, and were recruited, and then spat out when they refused to relinquish their families, their patriotism and their God.  Read leftwing literature published early in the twentieth century.  We were the beautiful workers back then.  Read leftwing literature now.  We suddenly morph into monsters, the worst reactionaries, the biggest obstacles to Revolution. 

My transgendered fellow citizens, don't buy the left's product.  Don't be their tool.  They will betray you as quickly and thoroughly as they betray everyone they use.  Look what they did to Juan Williams.  Look what they did to the women of Cologne, Germany.

When you, the transgendered, are no longer useful to them, you will be out in the cold again.  They will denounce you as decadent, as they have done in the past. 

I appeal to you: reject this fascism.  Come to terms with the rest of us.  Let's work on a solution that respects everyone.

Danusha Goska is the author of Save Send Delete

This piece appeared on American Thinker here

A Teacher Learns Something

Jordan Sokol Teacher Source
Somewhere on a university campus in North America in the not too recent past, a teacher did something she thought she would never do. Some thing she has not done in a lifetime of teaching.

This teacher is very scrupulous. She believes that there is an objective standard that exists outside the person, and the ethical person's job is to adhere to that standard. In short, you *don't* do just what you want to do, or what feels good to do. You do what is right, and what is right is defined by criteria that exist outside of you.

This teacher has none of the signatures of worldly power. She is not pretty, rich, or successful.

And yet. Year after year, she makes men cry.

She doesn't want to. She never knows when it will happen. It's not something for which she can prepare.

It's often the toughest of males. "Given your number of absences, assignments not completed, and test scores, your final grade is an F."

And the lids blink, and the whites cloud to red, and the tears flow.

It's awkward. How do you comfort someone with a skull tattoo and an obscene t-shirt? Really she doesn't know.

Look -- she's not looking for this. She doesn't like this.

When she meets with students, she brings a computer if the meeting place doesn't have a computer, and she puts a video of a flowing waterfall on the computer screen. She plays New Age music of wind chimes, yoga flutes and chanting monks.

She's a writer herself so she offers feedback in the gentlest of ways. "So, when you next write a paper like this, perhaps, in the future, rather than, as you do here, alternating between MLA style and APA style, pick one style and use it throughout the paper."

Even with that students cry. Male students cry. It's so awkward. A handsome young man who had been the model of self-possession all semester. Actual tears.

"Why???" she asks, throwing up her hands.

"I've never had anyone critique a paper I wrote the way that you do. This has just never happened to me before."

Is this really the participation-prize generation? Are millennials really made of spun sugar? Have they been helicopter-parented into fragility? Or is she really such a bitch?

She does not know.

But now there is a new phenomenon. Students crying when they get *good* news.

"You liked my paper!!! You appreciated it!"

"I thought I was going to fail your class!!"

"You're giving me an A? Thank you!!"

How to handle this?

She calls up images of kittens on the computer screen. "Here! Look at this!" she wants the kittens to provide what she feels it would be inappropriate to attempt to provide. She's trying to be Spock -- fair. Impartial. She can handle tears at a Polish wedding, but not at moments like this.

Recently, she did something she never thought she'd do.

There was -- This. Student.

Difficult.

Oh. My. God.

She would have just pulled out a gun and shot him, were she not a Christian -- and a supporter of gun control. Google would probably provide all the necessary clues on how to dispose of the body without leaving any trace. Probably it would involve bleach. She'd be into that. She's a clean freak. She likes a challenge.

Difficult in ways she could detail but not in a public forum.

Just go down the list and check off all the things a human can do to be a hemorrhoid, a delayer of sleep, someone who makes you, on Friday, Saturday and Sunday increasingly dread a scheduled Monday encounter.

So. Fairness. It is out there, It is numbers. It is reached by being Spock.

Years ago, a student, someone she loved, who was, yes, a criminal, threatened to kill her if she wouldn't give him a grade higher than earned. And she said no. Really. it means that much to her to be *fair.*

With this more recent student, because of a series of factors she cannot disclose, for the first time in her entire career, she bestowed a grade higher than had, strictly, in keeping with that external quality of fairness, been earned.

Tears? Ach yai, as Aunt Tetka used to say.

And then some words.

And the teacher realized -- it could have been pure chance -- but in this one instance, she realized, giving that grade turned out to be the exactly *right* thing to do. It was the thing that needed to be done to teach well, and to ... well to do the right thing.

She said to him, "This is a pay-it-forward situation. In the future, because of all that has transpired, you are going to apply what you've learned, and, on that future date, you are going to earn this grade."

The quality of mercy is not strained.

And that quality, like fairness, did not come from her. It was something out there. She was merely the channel.


Because she just wanted to go home and take a nap, and get back to birdwatching.

Jan Steen The Severe Teacher Source

A Joke about Religion

Source
I was walking across a bridge one day, and I saw a man standing on the edge, about to jump. I ran over and said: "Stop. Don't do it."

"Why shouldn't I?" he asked.

"Well, there's so much to live for!"

"Like what?"

"Are you religious?"

He said: "Yes."

I said: "Me too. Are you Christian or Buddhist?"

"Christian."

"Me too. Are you Catholic or Protestant?"

"Protestant."

"Me too. Are you Episcopalian or Baptist?"

"Baptist."

"Wow. Me too. Are you Baptist Church of God or Baptist Church of the Lord?"

"Baptist Church of God."

"Me too. Are you original Baptist Church of God, or are you Reformed Baptist Church of God?"

"Reformed Baptist Church of God."

"Me too. Are you Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1879, or Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1915?"

He said: "Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1915."

I said: "Die, heretic scum," and pushed him off.


Source of the joke: YouTube post here

Saturday, May 14, 2016

Garret Mountain Warblers

Photo by Poronto Source

"Birdwatching" sounds so innocent and uncomplicated but I have a roller coaster relationship with it. When I was a kid, I birdwatched every chance I got. I'd get home from school or work, tear off my clothes, put on a big, cotton man's shirt, probably one of my brothers', cut off shorts, no socks, no shoes, barefoot, grab my brother Joe's binoculars and run down to the woods just three houses away from me.

Near the Wanaque River I climbed rocky balds, strode through grasses, squeezed mooshy swamps around my toes and sometimes stepped into something soft that swallowed me up to my knees – it felt like quicksand – and baked under the treeless sun of a dried out quarry that looked more like a desert than New Jersey. I noticed even then that while I always fell off the horse in gym class, surrounded, as I was, by kids with whom I did not fit in, in the woods I never so much as slipped while crossing fallen log bridges, slick with moss. I stood silent in filtered shafts of sunlight beneath stands of big, tall deciduous trees. I was obsessive and I racked up quite a list of bird species in that little patch of woods.  

When I was in Peace Corps in Central Africa and Nepal I was, of course, in prime birdwatching habitat, but I couldn't bring myself to do it except casually. Africa wasn't safe – people were constantly threatening to rape, kidnap or kill me, and no, that's not hyperbole – and Nepal was just so poor. I never really understood how trekkers can do what they do – put on thousands of dollars of boots and camera lenses and state-of-the-art ergonomic backpacks and walk through villages where children die of hunger. I'm not criticizing; I'm just saying I didn't have the heart to do much serious birdwatching.

Birds were everywhere in Central Africa and Nepal, though, so I couldn't help but see hamerkops and hornbills, blue plantain eaters and lammergeier.

I came back to the states and went to grad school, paying my way as I went by working at everything from carpentry to telephone interviewing. That sucked up so much time that I didn't birdwatch much except during spare hours on weekends.

After I was told I had cancer I began devoting more time to birdwatching. Mortality tends to prod you to do what you enjoy while you can.

I subscribed to an email list of birders. I had always been a solo birdwatcher; it actually never occurred to me that some people do it with others.

The email list educated me and frightened me. A percentage of the people, and given that this was the internet I have no idea how many, were mean to the point of being unhinged.

An enthusiastic beginner, just starting out, posted a message saying that she thought she had seen a golden eagle. A golden eagle in the place and at the time that she claimed to have seen one would be very rare. Rather than gently educating this newbie, a list member tore her to shreds verbally. It was a long, high decibel, rageful post.

It gets worse. One birder broke into another birder's car and stole his field guide.

I hate to admit this but I learned from that list to be nervous around birdwatchers. Again, I've pretty much always birdwatched alone, so I don't have enough positive experience of birdwatching with others to counter-balance the absolute freak-out that that list caused me to feel. There is an undercurrent of rage and aggression, or maybe arrogance and cliquishness, or maybe petty competition, or maybe aloof not-in-touch-with-humanness in the birder world that I don't understand at all.

On the other hand through that list I did meet and birdwatch with another birder who is one of the nicest, smartest, and most pleasant and even-tempered people I've ever met. So … who knows.

It's May. To birdwatchers, May = warblers.

Birdwatchers receive pleasure from seeing a variety of birds, seeing a large number of birds, seeing colorful birds, and seeing new species. The May warbler migration spreads the banquet table with a feast of all these features.

Problem. Warblers are coquettish little sprites who love nothing more than to break your heart.

In late April, birdwatchers look up and dream of the wave that is about to break against the treetops. At that time, the trees are all bare of leaves and what birds there are are very visible. You see the occasional palm warbler, an early migrant, with no leaves obscuring your vision. Too, the palm warbler habitually pumps its tail up and down, so it is quite easy to identify. In late April, no leaves on the trees yet, that tail pumping with poke-you-in-the-eye obviousness, you think, how hard can this be?

Warblers arrive with the new foliage. Most of them like treetops. They are tiny and they move quickly. Birdwatchers in May stand around under trees, craning their necks, staring upward till their shoulders ache, ignoring the gnats flying into their eyes and the mosquitoes biting their ankles, trying to catch a glimpse of five inches of rapidly moving feathers. Warblers come in blue, green, yellow, red, black, white, brown, orange, with stripes, chinstraps, wing bars, eye-rings and eye and tail stripes. We need to see a critical mass of these signs for an accurate identification. As soon as we are almost sure what species we are looking at, the little flirt flits away never to be seen again, taking with it that key rump coloration we needed for a firm ID. Warbler watching is full of rewards and frustrations.

Garret Mountain in Paterson and West Paterson, NJ, is a "migrant trap." It is an oasis of woodland surrounded by urban areas. Migrating birds stopover here as they travel the Atlantic Flyway. Birdwatchers flock to Garret Mountain in May in order to witness the warbler migration.

I checked the weather report yesterday; NOAA predicted rain. I slept in. Around seven a.m. I realized that it was not raining and unlikely to. I thought it late to set out but figured, what the heck, nothing to lose.

I went to Garret and sure enough it was packed with people in jeans, sweatshirts, hiking shoes and binoculars and large lenses. Again, because of the dark experience of the listserve, I was wary. Few of the birders even glanced at me. Phew.

I walk at Garret as often as I can, and I am used to seeing the same birds in the same areas at the same times: the red-tailed hawk on the tower, the rough-winged swallows over the pond, the killdeer working the mudflat near the cattails, the chimney swifts skimming the sheer drop-off of rocks to Route 80 down below.

Today was totally different. Everywhere I looked, I saw warblers, vireos, thrushes, flycatchers, woodpeckers, and mimids. The park is very small; it's really just the top of a hill. You can see houses through the trees. But each little nook and cranny hosted its own convocation. I sat on a cupped mini-ledge hanging over route 80 and watched a house wren, warblers and thrushes swirl around this pocket-sized mini-environment.

As you walk, you attend to each green leaf fluttering in the sun overhead, each moldering leaf under your feet. You hear each tweet, buzz, and trill. You catch sight of a flash like the glow of a fire and you are delighted by that Blackburnian warbler that you see in full sun for mere seconds. Such close attention takes you out of time and place. You are stepping on eternity.

A two-mile loop trail circles the park. It took me three hours to complete the loop. I stopped every few steps to watch brilliantly colored warblers working the treetops. The most amazing sight of the day was a scarlet tanager, its wings closed, dipping and rising, dipping and rising, dipping and rising, over the treetops on the mountaintop, moving like a dolphin underwater.

I ran into a park maintenance man named Chris who chided me for walking on a closed trail. He explained that the trail was closed because workmen had to cut ash trees infected by emerald ash borer, an invasive species from China. Our ash trees have no defense against this species and they are all doomed, pending foresters finding some way to combat the pest. Chris explained that affected ash trees near the trails must be cut down before they fall across the trail. Ash are famous as the wood for baseball bats.

I asked Chris if anyone talks about doing anything about the deer in the park. They are numerous and they are tame. On any given visit, you might easily see twenty deer. They browse the undergrowth, making the park less able to support the many bird and mammal species that require undergrowth.

I am a great fan of Aldo Leopold's piece "Thinking Like a Mountain" that champions the something or someone – either a wolf or a man with a gun – that culls deer populations. I'm also a big fan of a youtube video about the very positive impact that wolves had on rivers in Yellowstone. The wolves culled the deer and the decrease in the number of deer improved life for many species in the park.

Chris said that even the police at Garret Mountain feed the deer. He said that city folk drive to Garret Mountain expressly to hand feed the deer donuts, Big Mac buns and oranges and thus have their encounter with nature.

At times, when I walk around Wayne, a suburban town, I have passed as many as three deer carcasses per mile. One just festered on the side of a very suburban road, on a nicely manicured lawn, for three days, swollen as a fully inflated balloon, before the city workers disposed of it.

I also met a very nice birder who reported seeing a black-billed cuckoo, a bird I did not see. He walked with me back to the spot where he'd seen it. We didn't find it but it was nice to share the trail for a while.

After my three-hour circuit of the two mile trail, of course I had to go around one more time, though I was thirsty and hungry and my back was killing me. It was noon, well past peak birding time, and yet the birds were still throwing themselves against my eyes. I was not walking in that hushed, slow, attentive birdwatcher-step, but merely rushing to get to my car, when a Canada warbler practically flew into my face, as three species of thrushes decorated the forest floor.

Have I died and gone to heaven? I read accounts of near death experiences. People report being greeted by departed loved ones. I don't have any departed loved ones and I won't have a welcoming committee. Maybe I have died and entered paradise and all these species of birds surrounding me are a sign of that. But I realized I still felt creaky and thirsty and that didn't feel like the rejuvenation that near-death experiences promise.

Conventionally a birder ends an account like this with the birds seen that day. I won't do so. I don't like the competitive aspect of birding. The "Did you see the cerulean warbler well if not you didn't see anything you are such a loser. I saw the cerulean and I am better than you."

I will say that I saw more warbler species in one day today than I'd ever seen in one day before.

I'll also say that I didn't see as many as I saw when I was a kid.

Bird population numbers are declining dramatically and visibly. Crashing. Crashing. The canary in the coalmine? Yes. I remember numbers of birds, and numbers of species, that I never encounter any more. Not even on spectacular days like today.

So I donate money to Audubon, World Wildlife Fund, Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, National Wildlife, Cornell Labs, and others. And I hope you do, too.

What will really help is elevating the status of women. The better off women are, the fewer children they have. The less educated and more oppressed women are, the more children they have. And so I do my part to educate the public about belief systems that keep women down. What's good for birds is also good for us. 

Photo by Laura Gooch Source
Photo by dbriz Source
photo by dbriz source


Thursday, May 12, 2016

The Facebook Wrath of Khan: Trying to Discuss Sadiq Khan's Victory within 1984 Conversational Guidelines

The "offensive" image
Source

You can read this at FrontPage Magazine here.

The Facebook Wrath of Khan

Trying to Discuss Sadiq Khan's Victory within 1984 Conversational Guidelines

On May 5, 2016, London elected Sadiq Khan its new mayor. Khan is a Muslim and the son of Pakistani immigrants. The anthropologist in me sought a thorough understanding of how this seismic shift was being received by England's Muslims and non-Muslims alike. I wanted to know what demographics supported Khan, who opposed him, and who took his victory as a serious blow. I wanted to know what significant statements Khan had made about his own history-making place in society.

I turned to NPR. In lieu of news, I heard a blast from a confetti cannon. NPR journalists are nothing if not expert at using every feature of their voice to instruct the listener in the correct response. Pauses, high pitch, sighs, monosyllables snippily clipped, all conduct the listener's progress as deftly and firmly as your tour guide at a super-max prison. This day the NPR announcer was giddy. Surely Khan's election was as worthy of unalloyed celebration as the rescue of a kitten from a well. It was as if Mayor Khan had saved Britain from a long, dark night in which only – ew, yuck – Christians had held office. Khan's election lifted some medieval curse.

I mentioned my frustration on Facebook: "Cairo, Egypt surprised the world today by electing a Christian Englishman as mayor. Next on NPR, we explore how this will impact the world's most populous Arab nation."

In that imaginary scenario, journalists would do the real work of exploring how millions of Muslim Arabs felt about being governed by a Christian Englishman. These Muslims would not be pressured to smile and announce their multiculturalism. They would not be shamed if they expressed anxiety. Reporters would merely take it down if their Muslim informants invoked the Crusades, colonialism, white supremacy, or Islamic sanctions against Muslims being ruled by Christians.

Demographers would astutely analyze population shifts, culture shifts, and the social anxiety that inevitably follow – as documented by Harvard's Robert Putnam and other social scientists. The information would be treated as a neutral commodity. There would be no badge of virtue in celebrating this English, Christian Cairo mayor, and no stigma or exclusion in questioning what his election means.

I'd like to hear a reporter calmly ask Khan, "How do you, a devout Muslim, understand qisas and diyya? This system attributes a sliding scale of value to human beings, with Muslim males on the top and Pagan females at the bottom. How do you understand the Koran's command that Muslims not take Jews or Christians as friends? How, as mayor, will you navigate Islam's prohibitions surrounding men talking to women?"   

I'm Polish, American, and Catholic. I get asked tougher questions regularly. Wake me up in the middle of the night, shine a light in my face, and ask me to give my position on the priest sex abuse crisis, the Inquisition, or Vietnam. I respect people's concerns about these issues and I've done research to respond responsibly – that's what the Bible tells me to do in 1 Peter 3:15; it's what Thomas Jefferson said Americans must do in the first sentence of the Declaration of Independence. I wasn't asking any more of Khan than others have asked of me.

I posted my frustration that Khan's election was being treated as a litmus test for righteousness. "Marek," a Facebook friend who lives in England, chided me. "Religion plays far less of a role in British political life than in America," Marek tut-tutted. He argued that Khan's religion was not worthy of discussion, and that Khan is a model multiculturalist. Marek posted a photo of Khan standing next to a Christian cleric, and he reported that Khan voted for "marriage equality." Marek closed with, "I will forebear from commenting in depth on the irony of an American pontificating on racial tensions."

Khan-boosting like Marek's can be found all over the web. Again, like Marek, there is the competitive factor: Khan's election is an ornament showing that the English, unlike Americans, are not mired in racial strife. The single most disturbing factoid used to quash any serious discussion of Khan's historic win: Khan attended the UK's Holocaust memorial ceremony; therefore, he must be a really good guy.

Let's get serious. Ken Livingstone is the former mayor of London. He is a leader of the Labour Party. Last month Livingstone said that Hitler was a Zionist. He said this after Naz Shah, another Labour pol, was revealed to have posted on Facebook in 2014 that Jews should be expelled from the Middle East. The Labour Party, Khan's party, faces charges of being anti-Semitic.

What freshly-elected public official, especially under these circumstances, wouldn't attend the UK's official Holocaust memorial ceremony? Khan did something that is as necessary, normal, and tactically beneficial for a politician as kissing babies and eating rubber chicken. In any case, Khan's visit "unleashed an anti-Semitic twitter barrage," according to Haaretz. (The Forward mostly likes Khan.)

Marek's comments praising Khan and pooh-poohing my desire for a deeper discussion of his election felt, to me, like the heavy hand of thought control. The official narrative: there is no tension between Muslims and non-Muslims in England. Anyone who even asks how Khan's religion affects the worldview of various demographic groups in the UK is race-baiting. There is nothing to see here. Move along.

I disagreed with Marek. I stated my disagreement in a series of photos. I posted a photo of Anjem Choudary. I posted a photo of Lee Rigby, in his scarlet uniform, holding his son, Jack. I posted a meme of mug shots of four of the Rotherham rapists. I posted a link to an article about an increase in attacks on Jews in London.

On April 11, 2016, ICM released the survey "What Muslims Really Think." One subsequent headline: "Jail Gays, Introduce Shariah."

In the Sunday Times, Trevor Philips wrote, "Liberal opinion in Britain has, for more than two decades, maintained that most Muslims are just like everyone else … data collected by the respected research firm ICM shows what the polling experts call 'a chasm' opening between Muslims and non-Muslims on such fundamentals as marriage, relations between men and women, schooling, freedom of expression and even the validity of violence in defense of religion … the gaps between Muslim and non-Muslim youngsters are nearly as large as those between their elders."

Mind, Trevor Philips is former chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission and he is current Deputy Chairman of the Board of the National Equality Standard. He helped to popularize the term "Islamophobia" and to suppress criticism of Islam. He's not your stereotypical white supremacist xenophobe. He's a black, Guianese career liberal.

I could not, though, post the above-mentioned poll. Facebook had blocked me from posting further. Facebook sent me two posts it deemed offensive. One was the meme of the Rotherham rapists. The other was the image of Lee Rigby holding his son. Someone had reported those posts. My guess is that that someone was Marek, but I have no way of knowing. I checked Facebook again 24 hours later; I still could not post. I checked again 36 hours later; my ability to post had been restored.

During my time of being blocked from Facebook, I received an email from a friend. "I wondered how long it would be before someone reported you to the FB police. You speak too clearly and un-politically correctly for the liberal society at large. When you are able to post again, tone it down a bit."

I thought of the times I received private messages from Facebook friends saying that they agreed with what I had posted, but they could not endorse my post with so much as a "like," never mind a comment, because "My name would be attached. People I know might see. There would be trouble."

A friend's posts about the latest episode of Game of Thrones always had the "public" setting. Anyone can see those posts. If the friend voiced second thoughts about the Black Lives Matter movement, the settings suddenly became "Friends only."

Recently a successful, published university professor wrote to compliment my writing. He told me he had to write me privately because all of his public material addressing jihad is under a pseudonym.

I was lucky enough to be a student in Poland 1988-89. I was one of millions of foot soldiers dismantling the Soviet Empire. We all ran from water cannons and tear gas. Some of us were arrested and beaten up. Some lost jobs, were kicked out of school, or had their passports taken away. I never heard any of my fellow protestors say, "Tone it down a bit."

I am sad that in the free West "tone it down a bit" is considered the best option. I am disheartened that Facebook, and universities – not the Stasi or the Zomo – are able to intimidate free-thinking people into suppression of the exercise of their free speech rights.

Finally, let me confuse those most comfortable thinking in stereotypes. On May 13, 2014, I voted for Andre Sayegh for mayor of my city, Paterson, NJ. When I voted for him, I assumed that he was a Muslim. I am now not sure what his religion is – I just asked him via a Facebook post and he did not respond, and I respect his reticence. I voted for him because I have interacted with him personally and I think he would have done better than current Mayor Jose Torres, who has been accused of corruption.

Sadiq Khan? I know next to nothing about him, or about his reception and impact. That's why I so hoped for a real, probing news account. What I got, instead, was coercion, censorship, and silencing.  

The antagonist in this story is not a Muslim. I don't know who reported me, but my best guess is Marek, a Catholic. Mark Zuckerberg is not a Muslim. His employees admit to tinkering with Facebook settings to suppress conservative news.

And, finally, I have a Facebook friend, Sandy McReynolds, who posts overtly anti-Christian and anti-Conservative material. I have never reported him. I don't block him. I haven't sent his name to his boss.

When Sandy posts anti-Christian material, I argue with him. He has called me stupid and crazy. I have called him a hatemonger. We have been friends for thirty years. My life would be less without Sandy in it. Given that he sees the world so differently than I do, contact with him teaches me things I would not otherwise learn. Freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, not demonizing those with whom we disagree, and diverse friendships: the Politically Correct should give them all a whirl.

Danusha Goska is the author of Save Send Delete