This article appears today in FrontPage Magazine here.
The Counterrevolutionary Ladies' Auxiliary
What Happens When a Woman Leaves the Left?
"Man is a political animal" – Aristotle
"I flip when a fellow sends me flowers,
I drool over dresses made of lace,
I talk on the telephone for hours
With a pound and a half of cream upon my face!" – Oscar
Hammerstein
David Horowitz, David Mamet, and Jon Voight are among the
famous one-time leftists who underwent a conversion to political conservatism.
In that sense, I am like them – I am also a former
leftist. In another sense, I am different. I'm a woman.
When one changes from leftwing to rightwing, one
encounters some bumps in the road. Some of those bumps are different for women.
We face different social challenges, and we need different products.
My passion for politics and addiction to current events
has always marked me as different from my female peers. My mother and older
sister, though, were also political junkies. My mother took me to my first
Washington, DC protest rally. Having political mentors protected me from my
more classically feminine peers' contempt for politics. Being the lone girl in
the all-night political discussion has its perks. I never dated the captain of
the football team; I went with the guy who had a copy of the Communist
Manifesto in his back pocket.
In other ways, though, I am more typically female. I'm
bad at math. I love pretty things. I'd rather bake cookies and clean house than
do almost anything else. A huge percentage of my mental energy is devoted to
questions like: "Does that person like me? How can I make that person like
me? Is that person happy? How can I make that person happy?"
I know that identifying some features as more
"feminine" and others as more "masculine" defies a weird
maze of Politically Correct dictates that shift like a scaffold floating on
ocean waves. When the US Army, say, says that short hair is masculine, that is
met with protest. When Caitlyn Jenner says that long hair and cleavage makes
him a woman, Political Correctness suddenly tells us that we are all supposed
to agree. Me? I generalize based on numbers that accumulate into a critical
mass. When I say "I'm bad
at math" and "I
love to clean house" and relate that to being a woman, I am deferring
to masses of data.
I knew when I moved from left to right that I would lose
some friends. I knew because I felt a certain amount of fear before saying:
- There are very few things that the
government should be allowed to force people to do.
- People make choices. There are
inevitable consequences to those choices, consequences from which it is
not my duty to offer rescue.
- A fetus is a human life.
- Cultures are unequal.
- I am a Christian.
- I am proud to be American.
- Communism doesn't work.
Facebook provides a unique archive for broken
relationships. Final contacts are timestamped and often accompanied by a
manifesto.
The loss of my left-wing male friends has often been
linear and uncomplicated. It works like this:
A. I say something overtly political and obviously taboo.
B. My left-wing male friend protests.
C. He unfriends me.
D. There is no further contact.
John and I met when we were both grad students. I danced
at his wedding. John once drove eight hundred miles to hear me give a talk. One
day I posted a meme mocking Sandra Fluke. John posted a terse protest. John
believes that the government should compel private entities like Georgetown
University to provide free birth control. John, my friend of over ten years,
unfriended me. He blocked me. We have not spoken since.
That kind of surgical precision, linear progression, and
crystal clarity on policy issues, typical of male unfriendings, is often not
how it works with women. The line between what is political and what is not is
much messier. Women have worked much harder to convert me back to correct
thought patterns than men have. One woman friend repeatedly said to me,
"But you are a kind person. Being rightwing is not kind. Why would you do
that? Be kind."
Women tend to bond over discussions of food,
relationships, and caretaking activities like home décor, cleaning routines,
and child care. How does politics enter into any of that, you may ask? What is
a leftwing household cleaning product versus a rightwing household cleaning
product? Where, exactly, does a woman cross the line and lose a friend? I often
only figure that out after I've crossed the line and lost the friend.
A myriad of unspoken assumptions often underlie
interactions in the West today. Here is just a handful: America, the West, and
Christianity are oppressive; state coercion of income redistribution is
synonymous with compassion; non-Western peoples are more environmentally
friendly and warm and cuddly; women are better than men. These assumptions
appear not just in political manifestos. They appear in soap packaging, in
memoirs, in party games. Below is a description of three failed friendships
with other women. We did not part over policy issues. We parted over art, over
compassion, and over spirituality.
It's a yearly ritual: I wait for the day after Christmas,
when desk calendars go on sale. Then I go to a bookstore and buy my Mary
Engelbreit desk calendar, featuring her illustrations on every page. She draws
women, children, and couples dancing; she draws moms and dads and puppies and
kittens and apple orchards and wrap-around porches and sunflowers and
moonlight. Her artwork is accompanied by uplifting quotes: "When a child
is born, so is a grandmother" and "If you have knowledge, let others
light their candles by it."
When I discovered that I could "friend" Mary
Engelbreit on Facebook, I was delighted. Short of "friending"
Johannes Vermeer, what more could I, as an art fan, hope for?
In the summer of 2015, Mary posted a picture of a weeping
black mother embracing a terrified, cherubic toddler holding his hands over his
head. Before them lay a newspaper with the headline: "Hands up; don't
shoot." The caption read: "No one should have to teach their children
this in the USA." Mary's illustration was a comment on the death of Michael
Brown. After Brown was shot to death by police officer Darren Wilson, a false
narrative emerged. The protesters who would tear Ferguson, Missouri to shreds
insisted that Brown had surrendered to Wilson. In fact, video and eyewitness
testimony showed that Brown had robbed a store, roughed up the store clerk, resisted
arrest, attempted to grab Wilson's gun, and charged at him.
I posted on Mary's page that I live in Paterson, NJ. Paterson
is listed
as one of the top ten dangerous small cities in America. Two black men were
shot to death in front of my building by another black man. I wrote to Mary
that when rich white liberals encourage blacks to see themselves as powerless
victims with no responsibility for their fate, that message helps to doom black
people to powerless, chaotic, nihilistic lives. After I posted this comment, my
ability to post or like comments on Mary's page was rescinded.
My connection with Mary Engelbreit was tenuous and limited
to being able to like and comment on her Facebook page. Mandy and I, on the
other hand, were friends outside of Facebook. We used to work together in a university
library. Mandy and I never talked about politics. In grad school, as we
beavered away in a tiny, windowless, cinder-block office, we talked about her
dissertation research on prostitutes, about relationships, and about men, women,
and sex. On Facebook, Mandy mostly griped – hilariously and outrageously –
about her job. She also posted vintage photos of deceased loved ones. I had
never met Mandy's grandparents or aunts or uncles, but the photos were so
expressive that I felt that I had. I was always sure to "like" and
leave a comment to honor Mandy's family.
One day Mandy linked an article about the invention of color
film.
One might think that the invention of color film would be
something that one could be proud of, that one could celebrate. We get to live
in an innovative civilization, and during an era, when cool inventions make
life richer. We're not living in caves trying to figure out how to use clay and
ashes to daub images of a herd of aurochs on the wall. When I miss my loved
ones, I can take it for granted that I can turn to snapshots of them at their
best moments, and delight my eyes and warm my heart. I can
"introduce" new people in my life to my departed mother because I
have her color photo. People who have an eye for color and design can exercise
their talent by snapping backyard flowers or mountain peaks. All good, right? Well,
no.
According to a 2009 scholarly article by Concordia University
Communications Studies Professor Lorna Roth, Kodachrome was racist. It was
invented to best capture the tones of Caucasian skin. It did not adequately
depict black people.
I responded to the article Mandy posted. The inventors of
color film were white, I said, and they had largely white audiences and
consumers. Must we assume nefarious motives? Indeed, as one account
has it, "if subjects with different skin tones appeared in the same scene,
[technicians] supplemented the calibration process with special lighting or
makeup techniques to ensure non-white participants looked good." Technicians
never stopped improving. "New technologies have since emerged capable of
representing a wider range of skin colors. Kodak devised improved film stocks
with an expanded range of brown and black tones. The growth of digital imaging
has further transformed both photography and film-making, allowing artists an
unprecedented degree of control over color balance."
It seemed to me that the article Mandy linked was taking
a good – color film – and turning it into yet another hair shirt we all had to
don to shame ourselves for being Americans, Westerners, white, or whatever
group you wanted to flagellate that day. Every aspect of life must be a
reminder that white people have caused African Americans to suffer. White
people have caused African Americans
to suffer. One is never allowed to think about anything else, though. Not even
just the aesthetic quality and ingenuity of color film. Mandy had posted so
many really lovely photos of her relatives. How could she not value film?
I keyed my tone to Mandy's, which falls between
"snotty" and "bitchy" on the discourse spectrum. "I
think color film is more good than bad; do we have to feel guilty all the time?"
I asked, in paraphrase. I have to paraphrase my post because I can no longer
see it. Mandy accused me of "hating" her because she is liberal. I
don't think Mandy is liberal at all; in all the years I've known her, she has
been apolitical. Thinking about prostitutes, relationships and sex, and griping
about your job, and posting photos of your loved ones on Facebook are neither rightwing
nor leftwing activities. I'll never get to discuss these questions with Mandy,
because after sending me the message informing me that I obviously
"hated" her as I "hate" all "liberals," Mandy
blocked me. I did cry.
Christina and Paula, on the other hand, worked very hard
to convert me.
Christina and Paula were promoting the current mass
migration of Muslims into Europe. They insisted that theirs was the only
"compassionate" response. Promoters of the mass migration frequently
cited the photo of drowned Aylan Kurdi. It's impossible not to be moved by the photo,
even after discovering how manipulated both the image and the narrative behind
it had been.
I responded that I saw nothing "compassionate"
about urging millions of migrants to abandon their homes and gamble all in a
flight to Europe, a risk that would inevitably result in disappointment for the
majority.
Anyone who has ever met an immigrant – like my own parents
– knows that under the best circumstances immigration is inevitably traumatic. The
United Nations reports that 72% of the migrants are able-bodied males.
Siphoning out 72% of the able-bodied males of a population is something that
war does, that plague does. For "compassionate" people in Europe to
urge this societal drain on struggling nations is not doing them any favors. The
Economist reported that 2,600 people
are known to have died in their attempts to reach Europe. Of course many more have
died without ever appearing on any official tally. We must assume that many have
been raped, or robbed, or otherwise ruined. Migrants arrive in a very foreign
culture, where even the red cross on aid food and water is offensive and renders
the provisions forbidden for religious reasons.
I begged the migration advocates to consider two photos
in addition to the well-known one of Aylan Kurdi. One showed migrants waving a
terrified, crying toddler at Hungarian police. The barefoot toddler, dressed in
a red t-shirt and diapers, appeared to have been shoved, alone, through a crack
in a border fence Hungarian police had erected. It was obvious that the toddler
was being used as a propaganda prop.
In another image, a migrant grasped a woman and infant.
All three were on train tracks. In video
taken before this photo was snapped, the man is shown throwing this woman and
baby, perhaps his wife and child, onto the train tracks. Hungarian police
attempted to stop him, and to rescue the woman and baby. In a video account – whose
authenticity I cannot vouch for – a self-described eyewitness reports that
migrant men grabbed any child – not
necessarily their own child – to use as props to force themselves onto crowded
trains.
Real compassion demands that these migrants be helped in
or near their homelands, many of which are surrounded by wealthy and peaceful nations.
Saudi Arabia's 100,000 air-conditioned, uninhabited tents
should be filled. If migrants need help fighting ISIS, let us give them
military aid. If they need help with food or development, let us give them that
aid.
Christina and Paula insisted that any resistance to the
mass migration was "racist" and "dehumanized" the migrants.
Women are supposed to take care of others – like that helpless child Aylan
Kurdi photographed on Turkey's shore. We were supposed to open our arms and
offer succor, like Angela "Mama" Merkel.
Finally, there was Val. Val posted video from the September, 2014 People's
Climate March. In Val's video, Mexicans danced in front of a faux stone idol of
Coatlicue, an Aztec deity. The faux idol the dancers worshipped was a faithful
rendition of the real idol in the National Museum of Anthropology and History
in Mexico City. Coatlicue is a killer; she wears a necklace festooned with anatomically
correct disembodied human hearts, amputated human hands, and desiccated human skulls.
Coatlicue's fashion accessories are reflective of the cannibalism and human
sacrifice that were central to Aztec religion.
To Val, though, the dance was above criticism. The
dancers and their deity were non-Western and "indigenous;" Coatlicue
was a goddess – not a god. All these features made Coatlicue superior to the
evil, male, Western God of the Judeo-Christian tradition. To believe this, you
have to ignore several realities, including the fact that Mexico did see
civilizational collapse before Columbus ever arrived, a collapse indigenous
people may have brought about through warfare or environmental damage.
Val called the dance "sacred." I commented,
"It's not really sacred till they rip out the still-beating heart of their
sacrificial victim" – a key moment in Aztec ritual. Val and her friends
came down on me like a box of rocks. I had to respect what was sacred to them,
they insisted. I responded, "I don't respect human sacrifice." I
refused to participate in the charade that non-Western religions are all love
fests.
As a woman and a former leftist, I have not found my
niche, my community, my store or my products.
There are political women of course, but their styles are
often masculinized – abrasive, confrontational, and individualistic. I may
agree with Ann Coulter, Pam Geller, or Megyn Kelly, but I find it hard to warm
to their delivery. Whom do I like? When I was a kid I saw Julie Andrews as
Maria von Trapp and Mary Poppins. I fell in love with her then and love her
still. She's beautiful, nurturing, all-powerful; she twirls on mountaintops and
bursts into song. What's not to like?
A critical mass of women spend more time reading memoirs
and novels than political tomes, more time cooking and cleaning than watching
Fox News or CNN, more time gossiping with other women than watching sports on
TV. Many of us chafe against the underlying leftist assumptions in the cultural
products we consume, and the conversations with friends we find ourselves in,
and we struggle to find a stance, a tone of voice, a role model, a spokesperson
who represents us. We are, I think, a largely untapped market.