Thursday, May 30, 2019
Sunday, May 26, 2019
Why I Am Still Catholic
Why I Am Still Catholic
When
you enter my apartment, you will not see a framed photograph of me, beaming, standing
next to the pope. People who've been in my apartment for a few hours have asked
me if I'm Jewish – I get that a lot. No doubt these folks missed the Catholic
church calendar in the kitchen, and the plastic rosary hanging on a nail near
the door, above my walking stick and my shoes. Without Google I could not hold
up my end in the rare theological debates I do enter into. I'm not even named after
a saint. I believe that women and married men should be allowed to be priests,
and I don't make it to mass every Sunday. Even so, I am Catholic.
Being
molested by a priest is not my tragedy. This is: I've never had a good experience
with one. I've tried. When I was a teenager, my brother was killed on my
birthday. He was buried from the parish where I and my six siblings were
baptized, went to Catholic school, and received first holy communion. I was
standing in a funeral parlor, my face covered with tears. Our priest entered,
looked at me, and smiled warmly. He approached. I tried to gather myself. He
walked right past me. His smile was for the person standing behind me, someone
who could donate much more to the church coffers and to his ego than my blue-collar,
immigrant family ever could.
Even
so, I am Catholic. I believe that every mass is the reenactment of history's
central event: God becomes man, suffers for me, and offers his substance for my
salvation. I believe that I have inherited this story, this ritual, and this
opportunity for salvation from human hands and mouths, who have passed it, one
to the next, for two thousand years, in an unbroken line, culminating in Jesus
himself. I believe that without this human family, I would be lost. I believe
that my presence in church supports other mortals just like me. My little
secret: I always cry at mass. I hide it. But the tears break free, however silently.
I am
Catholic because when I bring big questions to the Vatican website and read the
church's justifications for the church's stances, I encounter peerless wisdom,
humility, and power. I am Catholic, as opposed to Protestant, because Protestant
prejudice against Catholics has hit me across the face, from my childhood on a
school bus to the funerals of loved ones, when Protestant in-laws have insisted
that my Catholic mother would not go to Heaven. This prejudice entails class and
ethnic bigotry disguised as theological contempt. I know what Jews mean when
they say that no matter how little they feel their own Jewishness, encounters
with anti-Semites make them feel Jewish.
How,
you want to ask, can I remain in a church that sheltered priests who molested
children? I have asked myself that question more times than anyone has asked it
of me.
When
I am through with my day's work, hunched over a keyboard in a position that
would give a yoga instructor or chiropractor a panic attack, I tie on a pair of
sneakers, toss binoculars and rosary into a daypack, grasp my walking stick, and
hike up to Garret Mountain. I walk over Paterson, NJ streets strewn with
garbage: wrecked televisions, hypodermic needles, and sanitary pads. A landslide
of trash tumbles from a Front Street apartment complex into the Passaic River.
Past lawns specked with cigarette butts, chicken bones, and fast food
packaging, I walk up five hundred feet. I tread on volcanic outcroppings, and
find trees, a pond and deer. Even here, shredded plastic bags flutter from
branches. Dunkin Donuts cups litter the trails. But here I see osprey,
great-horned owls, yellow-throated warblers and hooded mergansers.
Facebook
friends luckier than I share photos of pristine vistas: The Tetons, the
Serengeti, the pampas. I don't inhabit their picture-perfect world. I inhabit a
fallen one, where I must grieve over what humanity has done to the planet. Garret
is the park I can reach with that one hour wrenched from work and dinner and
sleep and getting up and doing it all over again. Contact with compromised nature
is what most people on this overcrowded planet can have. Safaris are for the
one percent. At Garret, in a church pew, I inhabit a fallen world, one that
disciplines me to hope in the dark, to be humble in the light. I am grounded in
the awareness that my own feet stink. And this awes me: God communicated
himself to me through two thousand years of humans as flawed as I. That means
that someone as not-special as I am can play some part in passing this story
on. I'll never be a saint, but I, too can communicate that truth that I
accessed through the smudged, manmade lens of my church.
For
all that I donate to the World Wildlife Fund, the Nature Conservancy, and
Audubon, I contribute to this world's fallen state. Yes, I put plastic in a
garbage can after I've used it, rather than tossing it on Paterson's streets, but
garbage cans don't render plastic benign; it still takes up to a thousand years
to biodegrade. I obsess on fixing this. I remember the first time I got a
cancer diagnosis. I felt so relieved. I'll be dead soon. I no longer have to
"fix" what humanity is doing to the earth.
I
feel responsible for the Catholic Church, the church that claims my miniscule
donations. Should I not fix it? Should I not join The Voice of the Faithful,
FutureChurch, the parish council? Should I not vet the priest who
transubstantiates the Eucharist I receive? I don't. I'm not going to be Saint
Francis or Teresa of Avila, both famous reformers. I'm not even going to be a
foot soldier. I'm too puny; too charisma-free; I joust with too many other
dragons. I work two jobs, I'm chronically ill, and I like movies and
birdwatching too much to sacrifice any more time.
This
I know. The Catholic Church holds land, money, art, parishioners, and
theological power. Someone – someones – are doing something with all that. Someones
more powerful than I. I read of synods and lawsuits and feel the Lilliputian. I
hear stray sentences that sound good and right and I pray. I pray that these
someones are the right someones, that this moment is the right time, and that
the rudder is shifted in the right direction.
Essays
like this are supposed to conclude with clarion calls to action. I can't do
that. The best I can do is invoke the Serenity Prayer. In that prayer I ask for
the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, and also the courage to
change the things I can. For me, so far, that courage has entailed small
donations to reform movements, talking to the priest after mass, and
communicating to other people why I value the church. So far leaving the church
– which, to me, feels like abandoning the Catholics standing next to me in the
pew – has not seemed like the right choice. I continue to attend mass, and
place money in the collection plate, for the same reason I continue to visit
Garret Mountain. Both are pocked by serious disease. Both keep me grounded in
humility. I can't fix either one. Both offer me what I need, and what I can't
get anywhere else.
Danusha
Goska is the author of God
through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery.
This essay
first appeared at The Mindful Word, here.
Friday, May 17, 2019
We Do Need Another Hero: Theodore Hesburgh and Franciszka Halamajowa Documentaries
We Do
Need Another Hero
And
Recent Documentaries Present Us with Two New Ones
In
November, 2018, several of my liberal Facebook friends shared euphoric memes of
newly elected Congresswomen Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan
Omar. If Facebook posts were audible as well as visual, these posts would
whoop, cheer, and applaud – indeed they would ululate.
"What
do you know about these women?" I asked. "What makes you think that
their terms as congresspeople will be any more consequential than any other?"
What I knew about these three women indicated to me that their election
presented no cause for elation. Ocasio-Cortez had displayed a cringeworthy lack
of depth in a July, 2018 Firing Line
interview. Ilhan Omar had a
history of anti-Semitic tweets and there was evidence strongly suggesting
that she had married
her own brother as part of an immigration scam. Rashida Tlaib had
referred to the president of the US with a twelve-letter curse word. In that
same talk, Tlaib ululated and said, "You
can't take the Palestinian out of me. I feel so Palestinian today." She
celebrated her victory by posing with a Palestinian
flag, and her
office map was altered to indicate that Israel was in fact "Palestine."
Why were these women heroes?
Finally
one of my liberal friends acknowledged that the rhapsodic, over-the-top
celebration had nothing to do with these women's proposals, intellects, or
accomplishments. Rather, liberals were celebrating the new celebrities'
identities. It's so easy to be a hero these days. All you have to do is be
other than the villain of the moment: the white, Christian, American man.
History
is being re-written. My liberal friends believe that the world has been run by
white, Christian, American, heterosexual men. These men have all been racist,
sexist, and homophobic. Other people, who are not white or American or
Christian or heterosexual are, by virtue of their identities alone, virtuous.
As these others gain power, the world improves.
This
revisionist history is expressed in quite overt ways. Omar told
us that "CAIR was founded after 9-11 because some people did
something." Ocasio-Cortez claimed
that Republicans "had to amend the Constitution of the United
States to make sure Roosevelt did not get reelected" in 1947, two years
after Roosevelt died. Rashida Tlaib said
that she feels "a calming feeling … when I think of the
Holocaust" because her Muslim Arab ancestors created "a safe haven
for Jews."
The
entertainment industry has gotten the revisionist message, as have reviewers.
Two very good recent films, Green
Book and The Best of Enemies, were lambasted as "white
savior" movies. Both films are based on real events from
decades ago. The main characters in both films are white men who begin as
racists. Both are forced into situations where they have positive encounters
with a black person. Later they both go on to forge lasting friendships with
black people. One might think that this plot outline would offend no one –
that, rather, viewers would find it inspirational. Well, it would offend no one
rational, but rationality is optional nowadays.
Hostility
to films that depict white American men behaving in an at all decent manner
towards women or people of color is so intense that docudramas now resort to distorting
history. Hidden Figures is a 2016
film that dramatized the true story of African American women who made
significant contributions to NASA's space race. The film depicts a handful of
women who, on their own and without significant support from any white men,
break through pervasive racism and sexism. Any thinking person will recognize
that this aspect of the film cannot be accurate. Without white and male allies,
the Civil Rights Movement and feminism never would have gotten off the ground.
In fact, in several respects, Hidden
Figures changed historical realities in order to worsen the image of the
majority white males working at NASA. The segregation depicted in the film was a thing of
the past during the time period of the film's action. Several other
events in the film were depicted as worse and more
racist than they were in real life. Why? Perhaps so that the film
could avoid the dreaded moniker of "white savior" movie.
When
I think of young, conventionally educated Americans, I worry. Too many have
been brainwashed and demoralized by revisionist history. They look at their own
country, at their heritage, Western Civilization and the Judeo-Christian
tradition, and see only error and oppression. In too many classrooms and media
products, status, good and evil are all determined by ethnic, religious, or
gender identity. This process is occurring even as I write this. Tlaib's
inexcusable comments about the Holocaust and Muslims providing a
"haven" for Jews are the subject of at least five Washington Post articles in the past sixteen
hours. The headlines tell the story: "Anatomy
of a Smear," "House
Republicans Criticize Tlaib" "Trump
Joins GOP Criticism," "Republicans
Are Ignoring Reality to Twist Tlaib's" comment, "Trump,
GOP, Twisting" Tlaib's comment. Tlaib, because of her identity,
must be made virtuous. Republicans, because of their identity, must be made
villains.
If I
had the power, I would encourage as many young people as possible to watch two recent
documentaries. They are movies you've probably never heard of, about people you
have probably never heard of. The lead characters are not the type of hero the
entertainment industry or its critics is invested in celebrating these days.
These two people are the old-fashioned kind of hero who earned heroism, not by
being young and pretty, non-white and left-wing, but by doing very hard things.
One of these heroes did what she did in total anonymity, and died unknown.
I was
checking the new releases in a local theater when I saw the title Hesburgh. Sounds like a Dracula spin-off, I thought. I had never heard the name before and
I knew nothing about the movie. Curious, I did a quick Google search and
discovered that Hesburgh is a
documentary about a Catholic priest. A documentary about a Catholic priest
running in a suburban multiplex? I had to see it.
Father
Theodore Hesburgh was president of Notre Dame for thirty-five years, 1952–1987.
He also played a role in the Civil Rights Movement, the effort to limit nuclear
arms, and immigration reform. He had close, personal relationships with
Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Clinton, and Obama,
Popes Paul VI and John Paul II, Martin Luther King Jr and Ann Landers. Much of
the film consists of grainy, decades-old film footage of the Space Race, The
Civil Rights Movement, and the Vietnam War. A few scenes are reenactments of
key moments in Hesburgh's life. There are also contemporary interviews with
people who knew Hesburgh, including Leon Panetta and Wyoming Senator Alan
Simpson. Speakers at Hesburgh's memorial service included Mike Pence and
Condoleezza Rice.
Hesburgh
sounds like a priestly Kardashian, no? Listen, I walked into the theater
knowing nothing about Theodore Hesburgh and by the end of the film my face was
sloppy with tears. I cry no tears for Kardashians. Why did this film move me so
much?
The
film depicts Hesburgh as a remarkably humble man. As a man who, yes, wined and
dined with the rich and powerful, but who never lost the personal touch, and
who was almost supernaturally humble, and relentlessly committed to his
priestly vocation. In every scene I can remember, from the time he took his
vows to his 2015 death at age 97, Hesburgh is wearing the exact same clothing:
the unadorned, dark suit and white collar of a priest of the Congregation of
the Holy Cross. Selecting personal dress and adornment is a fundamental human
choice. Hesburgh surrendered that choice at 18 and never took it back. In a
clip from an interview, TV host Phil Donahue presses Hesburgh. How have you
lived your life alone, without a wife? Hesburgh's visage is severe but calm. "I
made that choice at 18." It's remarkable to witness a man of his word.
Pope
Paul VI presented Hesburgh with his own emerald ring as a gift. The implication
was that the pope hoped to elevate Hesburgh to cardinal. Hesburgh put the ring
in a drawer. His vocation was as a priest, not a "prince of the church."
Former students from Notre Dame testify on camera that Hesburgh was like a
father to them. Journalist Robert Sam Anson, a Notre Dame alum, was taken
prisoner in Cambodia during the Vietnam War. Hesburgh phoned the Vatican to
help broker his release. Anson is visibly moved when discussing Hesburgh.
Hesburgh's
most sustained effort in public affairs, at least as depicted in the film, was
in the field of Civil Rights. In one
of the most famous images of Hesburgh, he is linking arms with
Martin Luther King Jr. at Soldier Field in Chicago in 1964, as they sing
together "We Shall Overcome." Hesburgh was no mere fellow traveler.
When Civil Rights Commission members were stonewalling each other, the
Northerners against the Southerners, Hesburgh kept his eye on the individual
human soul. His faith taught him that each Commission member, no matter how
obstructionist, was made in the image and likeness of God. With that
perspective, Hesburgh recognized that one thing all these diverse combatants
had in common was a love of fishing. He arranged for a Notre Dame donor's
private jet to transport them to a secluded lake. There they could connect as
human beings, and make progress. Hesburgh was willing to stick his neck out even
when the presidents who counted him among their friends dropped the ball. The
Kennedy administration had concluded that pushing Civil Rights would cost
Kennedy votes in the South, and, thus, the election. They decided to "slow
walk" progress. Hesburgh at this instance, and at other key moments as
well, took it upon himself to press for an end to Jim Crow. Sorry, Hollywood
and film critics cum social justice warriors, but yes Hesburgh was one of many
white allies without whom the Civil Rights Movement would have been an
historical blip that reached the same dead-end of a thousand other liberation
movements in societies without conscience.
Like
any serious Catholic, Hesburgh faced criticism from the right and the left. The
Catholic Church opposes abortion, and, thus, gains approval and allies on the
right. Other stances on poverty and immigration earn approval and allies on the
left.
Conservative
Catholics condemn Hesburgh's defiance of the Vatican regarding the concept of a
Catholic university. In 1954, Hesburgh hosted Jesuit theologian John Courtney
Murray. Murray spoke on the individual freedom of conscience. The talk was to
be published. Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, secretary of the Holy Office
(formerly known as the Inquisition) ordered that the publication be
disappeared, and that no one be told why. "Roma locuta est, causa finita est," Hesburgh was told.
"Rome has spoken; the matter is finished." Hesburgh saw this as a
"frontal assault on academic freedom" and he published anyway. "There
was no way I was going to destroy the freedom and autonomy of the
university."
Hesburgh
wrote,
"The best and only traditional authority in the university is intellectual
competence… It was great wisdom in the medieval church to have university
theologians judged solely by their theological peers in the university… A great
Catholic university must begin by being a great university that is also Catholic."
As the New York Times summarized
Hesburgh's position in his 2015 obituary,
Hesburgh declared that "the pursuit of truth, not religious
indoctrination, was the ultimate goal of Catholic higher learning in the United
States." His declaration had high impact on other Catholic universities.
Hesburgh
rankled both supporters and opponents of the Vietnam War. Hesburgh was an admirer
of the military. After he was ordained, his personal goal was to be a military
chaplain. His superiors nixed that idea and assigned him to a career in
academia. Having taken a priestly vow of obedience, he had to comply. When
Notre Dame students wanted to burn down the ROTC building, Hesburgh argued
against the arson, insisting that America needed a military with a moral and
intellectual foundation, such as they could acquire at Notre Dame. Hesburgh
issued a strict rule against campus protests, threatening to suspend or expel
those engaging in anti-war demonstrations. This tough stance met with President
Nixon's approval. But Hesburgh personally
hoped for a withdrawal of troops.
Hesburgh the documentary depicts a strong, not-quite-silent
American hero of old-school masculinity. He's square of jaw, and graced with
Tyrone Power eyebrows. Hesburgh's facial expression does not significantly
change, no matter who his interlocutor is, or what the topic of conversation. He
makes no attempt to ingratiate. His voice neither rises nor falls. His stoicism
is in the John Wayne or Gary Cooper mold. Did he not face loneliness? The
documentary reports that Hesburgh was very close to his sister, and took her
death from breast cancer very hard. He also had a lengthy correspondence with
Ann Landers.
Filmmaker
Patrick Creadon was
a Notre Dame student. He was curious to see if "If Father Ted's life
really lives up to the legend that surrounds him." His film takes a "hard-hitting,
deep dive" into Hesburgh's life. "What we came up with is the story
of an extraordinary man who made a difference… he serves as an incredible role
model for anyone who wants to try to make the world a better place … While making the film, I thought, 'What was
his one superpower?' And I realized it was his kindness … He was very
transparent, honest, and trustworthy, but his kindness is what saw him through
some very difficult times in our country's history and helped him make really
tough decisions." Creadon is donating all profits from the film to
charity, including a hospital in Ecuador and a health care facility for Holy
Cross clergy.
***
Franciszka
Halamajowa died in obscurity. Few outside her immediate family had any idea of
her heroism. She never rubbed elbows with the rich or the powerful. When Nazi
Germany and Soviet Russia invaded Poland in 1939, Halamajowa was a 54
year old Polish, Catholic farm woman, her gray hair brushed back
into a simple bun. She was plump, with apple cheeks and kind eyes. She wore
simple, loose, cotton dresses. She lived on a small plot of land with fruit
trees and pigs in the small town of Sokal. Sokal was then in Eastern Poland; it
is now in Ukraine. In 1939, it had a mixed population of Poles, Ukrainians, and
5,200 Jews. Only thirty Jews survived the war. Sixteen Jews were sheltered by
Franciszka Halamajowa. The documentary No. 4 Street of Our Lady tells the almost unbelievable story of
Halamajowa's heroism. This ninety-minute, 2009 documentary is currently
available on Vimeo.
One
can't begin to understand Halamajowa's feat without understanding the Nazi and
Soviet approach to Poland. Both were genocidal, and their hostility to the
continued existence of Poland had begun centuries before. Under German and
Russian occupation beginning in the eighteenth century, at times and in places,
Poles could not build permanent dwellings on their own land, could not speak
their own language in school, and were subject to mass deportations to Siberia,
where many died. The Nazi Generalplan Ost
called for the genocide and occupation of Slavic nations. In his infamous August,
1939 "Armenian speech," Hitler said, "I have placed my
death-head formation in readiness … with orders to them to send to death
mercilessly and without compassion, men, women, and children of Polish
derivation and language. Only thus shall we gain the living space (Lebensraum)
which we need."
Soviet
Russians, Sokal's first World-War-Two-era occupiers, deported between 500,000
and 1.7 million Poles to Siberia. Soviet Russians arrested and imprisoned
hundreds of thousands of other Poles. Many were tortured and executed,
including 22,000 Polish Army officers shot in the Katyn Massacre. Soviet
propaganda depicted Poles as enemies of the people. Polish land was seized and
redistributed, most to collective farms. An estimated 150,000 - 500,000 Polish
citizens died during the Soviet occupation.
In
June, 1941, as part of Operation Barbarossa, the Nazis arrived. Scarred by the 1932-33
Soviet-orchestrated Ukrainian famine, interwar Polish rule, and Soviet
occupation, some Ukrainians collaborated with the Nazis. In addition to
persecuting Jews, Ukrainians
tortured, mutilated, and massacred Polish Catholics. Historians
estimate that approximately 100,000 Poles were murdered by Ukrainians.
All
this bloody history swirled around Franciszka Halamajowa as she tended her fruit
trees, chickens and pigs. Ukrainians knocked on her door and told her to leave.
Sokal was now Ukrainian territory, and no longer safe for a Polish woman alone
with a young daughter. Nazis could kill Poles for infractions so minor as
owning a radio. Poles were regularly rounded up and sent to slave labor or
concentration camps. Any aid given to any Jew, even something so simple as
offering a drink of water, was a capital
crime, not just for the one giving the aid, but for her entire
family. This punishment was unique to Poland. Miep Gies, who aided Anne Frank
in Holland, for example, survived betrayal and discovery. One list of Poles
killed for helping Jews includes 704
names. No doubt many more were killed but their accounts cannot be
documented.
Jews
escaping a Nazi aktion asked Halamajowa
for help. Yad
Vashem reports that Halamajowa and her daughter Helena "believed
that it was G-d who had brought the Jewish refugees to their door to test their
faith. They considered it their religious duty to protect the Jewish refugees,
and never demanded payment of any kind." It was not until after the war
that the Jews Halamajowa was hiding in a pigsty discovered that she had another
Jewish family hiding in a specially built dugout under her kitchen floor. Indeed,
Halamajowa was also hiding a renegade German soldier in her attic. He did not
want to participate in Nazi killing.
Poles
under Nazism were poor and hungry. That Halamajowa was able to feed herself,
her daughter, and all of her charges calls to mind the miracle of the loaves
and fishes. She had to dispose of hidden people's waste without attracting
German suspicion, or the suspicion of neighbors eager to receive a reward or
even just personal safety in exchange for collaboration. In the documentary,
one neighbor says, "We all knew but no one said anything." In fact
one neighbor did confront Halamajowa and tell her that he knew she was
sheltering Jews. This could have resulted in death. Instead he asked to see the
hiding Jews, recognized a kindly doctor, and remained mum.
The
horrors of Nazi occupation are brought home in an almost unbearably painful
portion of the documentary. One of the Jewish children couldn't stop crying.
The sound of her sobs might have betrayed other people and guaranteed their
death. The doctor had a dose of deadly poison. Everyone, including the girl's
own mother, decided that she had to be forced to swallow it. I will let you
discover what happens when you watch the documentary yourself.
After
the war, Halamajowa, an ethnic Pole, for her own safety, had to leave her home
in Sokal and travel to Poland, as it existed within its new, post-war borders. She
died in 1960, in a Poland still ruled by occupying Soviet Russians. In fact
just four years before Halamajowa's death, in 1956, 100,000 Poles faced off
against 400 tanks and 10,000 soldiers. Shots were fired and perhaps a hundred
Poles died, including one 13-year-old boy. Such demonstrations would continue
until 1989, when the Berlin Wall finally fell. No. 4 Street of Our Lady is a worthy tribute to a woman of peerless
heroism.
Self-examination
and self-criticism are foundational in the West. They are rooted in the
Judeo-Christian concepts of confession
of sins, restitution, and subsequent redemption. This is an
invaluable concept in our culture that has prompted our progress. Of course I
want young people to learn about American racism, priestly sex abuse, and those
Poles who committed acts of violence against Jews. But that's not enough. Let
them also learn about heroes like Hesburgh and Halamajowa.
Danusha
Goska is the author of God
through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery.
This piece
first appeared at Front Page Magazine here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)