Film-fan me loved "The Imitation Game." The me
who knows something about World War II felt that "The Imitation Game"
was a bit of an unfortunate farce.
Aesthetically "The Imitation Game" is like a
hundred other movies about British people dressed in attractive but muted
woolens who march about speaking about God and country and occasionally dropping
their civilized masks and giving play to their violence or their lust. We've
seen all this before: the vintage clothing, the vintage cars, the vintage
architecture, the golden lamplight on vintage interiors. We've seen it on
Masterpiece Theater and Merchant Ivory and Jane Austen films and Downtown Abbey
which I've never watched but which I feel as if I have watched.
"The Imitation Game" is also like a lot of bio
pics.
I really do wish "The Imitation Game" had some
aesthetic surprises up its sleeve.
"The Imitation Game" treats very complicated subject
matter: the breaking of an unbreakable code. I wanted the movie to tell me
something about this topic that I didn't already know. The film just puts an
enigma machine on a table and has a bunch of smart characters stare at it and
announce that it can produce one hundred fifty followed by eighteen zeroes
variations. Okay, but how? Give me something technical. The movie never trusts
its audience, or its own storytelling skills, enough even to scratch the surface
of the nuts and bolts of code-breaking.
Benedict Cumberbatch gives a fine performance as the
film's version of Alan Turing, the British mathematician who helped to decode
Germany's Enigma during WW II. In the film, Turing displays symptoms of
Asperger's. He doesn't get jokes and he has few friends. Everyone is mean to
him. He lives an isolated life with only one significant human companion, his
school chum Christopher. Turing is awkward and superior with his fellow
codebreakers, and they hate him. He is light years more advanced than they. If
only they could appreciate his brilliance! Turing is regarded with suspicion by
his superiors. They almost arrest him. They break into and search his home. Again,
this all feels hackneyed.
Enter Joan Clarke (Keira Knightley). Joan is a gifted
code-breaker. Like Turing, she too faces difficulties because of others'
ignorance and prejudice. People don't realize that a woman can be a worthy
code-breaker and they keep her back and put her down.
Joan encourages Turing to overcome his Asperger's
symptoms and to befriend his coworkers. He does so.
A casual comment by a secretary, that each German message
ends with the words "Heil Hitler," leads Turing to have the Aha
moment that breaks Enigma. His jubilation is short-lived. He realizes that he
can't rescue an English ship because if he does so, the Germans will realize
that the English have broken their code. Turing devises a mathematical method
to determine when to use information gathered from breaking the code, and when
not to.
Two other timelines are intertwined with the WW II
timeline. We are shown Turing's schooldays. He interacts with Christopher, his
schoolboy crush and only friend. Christopher departs from his life and Turing
is heartbroken. The headmaster of the school is cold in breaking this news to
young Turing. Poor little Turing must bear this hard news all by himself.
In the other timeline, also interwoven randomly into the
WW II timeline, Turing is interrogated in the early 1950s for "gross
indecency" – homosexuality. Turing undergoes chemical castration. This
affects his ability to think. He can't even do a simple crossword puzzle in the
newspaper. He is a broken man. The film insists that his death was a suicide. Some,
including Turing's mother, are not so sure of that.
I was moved by the film. The scenes of little schoolboy
Turing are very poignant; it's always hard to watch children suffer.
Cumberbatch is a very competent actor and he plays intellectual intelligence
well, which is a rare accomplishment. Not many actors could look as smart as
Cumberbatch does. He is convincing as someone with Asperger's.
The me who knows and cares something about accuracy in a
film "based on a true story" about WW II was very disappointed with
this movie.
"The Imitation Game" erases the significant
contribution of Polish war heroes and Polish mathematicians to the breaking of
Enigma. Like Turing, the Poles were also cruelly and ignominiously betrayed by
the very Brits they helped: from Churchill consciously lying about who
committed the Katyn massacre to Churchill handing the Poles to Stalin at Yalta
to Brits like Stephen Fry insisting that Polish Catholics caused the Holocaust.
It was ideologically convenient for Brits to shaft the
Poles, and the Brits did exactly that. "The Imitation Game" erases
the Poles because the film wants Turing to be a lone genius and a lone,
martyred homosexual. As it happens, during WW II, there were plenty of
opportunities for heroism and martyrdom; Turing did not monopolize the supply.
The film is inaccurate in other significant ways. Turing
was treated kindly by the headmaster around the Christopher incident, and
Turing remained in contact with Christopher's family. Turing proposed to Joan
Clarke because he liked her – he even told her he loved her – not to keep her
in the code-breaking program. He tried to re-start their relationship years
later. Turing could be funny and charming in real life. Etc.
The bottom line is that the filmmakers wanted to create
an image of Turing as an isolated genius, unappreciated by anyone, and
persecuted because of his homosexuality. In fact Turing was part of a team of
other geniuses, and he was open about being gay. I wish the film had been able
to tell us more about how a relatively privileged man had been so ill-treated.
His working class lover was not chemically castrated, for example. "The
Imitation Game," though, is not really interested in probing complex facts,
or in saying anything new.
No comments:
Post a Comment