Lent /
Tarot / Escape: The Six of Swords
There
are two famous escapes in the Bible that have a lot in common. In Exodus, in
the Old Testament, Pharaoh decrees that all male Jewish babies must be killed.
Moses escapes by water. His mother put him in a waterproofed basket and set him
afloat in the Nile. He is rescued by the Pharaoh's daughter and goes on to free
his people and lead them to the promised land. Later, of course, Moses and the
Jews escape via a land tunnel through water, in the famous parting of the Red
Sea incident.
Once
they reach the Promised Land, Jews under Joshua carry out a war against the
Canaanites for dominance. These wars are often cited as proof that Jews and
Christians have a tradition of jihad. Jews and Christians don't have a
tradition of jihad. These wars are time- population- and place-specific, and they
are limited. Nowhere in the Bible are Jews or Christians ordered to commit
perpetual war until the entire planet is either Jewish or Christian. Compare
this to hadith Bukhari 1:24 and numerous similar jihad verses.
Jesus,
like Moses, also escapes a ruler's genocidal decree. Herod orders a massacre of
first born Jewish sons, and Mary and Joseph take Jesus to Egypt.
In
recent years, archaeologists have argued that there is no support for the
stories of Exodus and Joshua. No evidence of vast numbers of Jews enslaved in
Egypt. No evidence whatsoever for the kind of mass warfare described in Joshua.
Rather, archaeologists argue, the process of Jews dominating was slow and
peaceful.
It's
a quandary. People accuse Jews of promoting a false history as true, and then
they accuse Jews of committing massacres that they claim never happened.
I
have two thoughts about this. First, when a people tells a story as part of
their origin, and pass on that story carefully for hundreds of years, I tend to
believe that there is at least a kernel of truth there. Archaeologists felt
similarly about the Trojan War. Maybe Artemis didn't actually send wind to
Agamemnon's ships – in other words, maybe the Greek gods were not actually
involved – but maybe there really was an event such as that described in
Homer's Iliad. Archaeological digs in Turkey support this.
Maybe
there weren't as many Jewish slaves in Egypt as described in Exodus. Indeed
there is no support for the large numbers of enslaved Jews as Exodus describes.
But I do think that when a people preserves a story as true – not as merely
symbolically true but actually true – for so long, I think there is a kernel of
truth there.
As
for the massive battles that Joshua describes – archeologists say that it is
likely that those battles never happened. There is no archaeological support
for them. Rather, what all those stories is meant to imply is that God wanted
his chosen people, the Jews, to remain utterly separated from the Canaanites,
who engaged in sinful behavior like sacrificing their own children to gods and
temple prostitution.
I'm
not Biblical archaeologist and I don't have a right to an opinion. I see that
there are very well-educated scholars on all side of the debates. So far, these
debates have not shaken my faith. The God of the Bible wants his people to be
free. That's a very special story. It has inspired freedom fighters for
thousands of years. It was central to the abolitionist and Civil Rights
movement. And the God of the Bible wants his people not to be seduced by evil secular
trends followed by non-believers.
No comments:
Post a Comment