A
doctor is worried that his patient may be suffering from depression. He asks
the patient the following questions. These questions are standard in depression
diagnosis.
"Do
you have little interest or pleasure in doing things?
Do
you feel down or hopeless?
Do you
have trouble falling asleep?
Are
you tired all the time?
Do
you have poor appetite?
Do
you feel bad about yourself?"
The
patient replies, "Well, ever since I saw two thousand of my fellows
crucified along the road, I have been having nightmares. Then they destroyed
the temple, murdered a million of us, and drove the survivors into exile. We
can't sacrifice to God any more. Then of course there was the mass suicide at
Masada. I doubt that we will survive as a people."
"I
see," the doctor says. He writes out a prescription for Prozac.
Linguists
often remark that different languages contain words that don't translate well
into other languages. That's why when we want to talk about chutzpah or schadenfreude
or champagne or samovars or jihad we resort to words taken from Yiddish, German,
French, Russian, and Arabic, respectively.
Some words
don't translate from one language to another. Some words don't translate from
one time period to another. "Depression" is one of those words that
doesn't translate well across eons.
I am
observing Lent this year by drawing a Tarot card at random and writing a stream
of consciousness blog about it. Today's card is the four of cups. The four of
cups depicts someone who looks depressed.
I
thought, can I really talk about a twenty-first century understanding of
depression in the context of the Bible? I realized, I can't.
And
that realization causes me to reflect.
Our
understanding of leprosy doesn't translate to the worldview of the Biblical
era, either. The Bible mandates strict anathema on lepers.
The
thing is, those interpreting that law didn't know how to differentiate leprosy
from non-contagious skin conditions. Even people with eczema – which looks and
feels really awful but which is not contagious and is not deadly – were subject
to shunning.
The
Jewish Encyclopedia records, "In the Talmud the classification or
definition of leprosy and of its symptoms seems to be determined not by medical
ideas, but by a literal and indiscriminating adherence to the letter of the
Levitical law; Talmudic sages were satisfied merely with communicating the
Biblical decisions. The Rabbis appear at times even to confuse true leprosy
with eczema."
Some
Christians condemned and cast out lepers. Lepers were judged to be hated by God
and heretics.
Christians
and Jews lacked complete understanding of leprosy.
There's
another twenty-first century word that Christians and Jews in the past did not
understand. The word is "homosexual."
What
does the Bible say about homosexuality? Nothing.
There
are surprisingly few condemnations of same sex intercourse in the Bible. The
Old Testament never mentions women having sex with each other. When same sex intercourse
is condemned, it's usually condemned as part of exploitative behavior, for
example as occurred between Pagan men and their sex slaves, or as part of Pagan
orgies.
The
Bible never talks about homosexuality – it never talks about people who,
through a morally neutral accident of birth, find love in mutually fulfilling, same
sex relationships with one other consenting adult. That is absolutely never
mentioned in the Bible.
You
can read more about this topic here.
It's an essay called "What Does the Bible Say about Homosexuality"
and it's by Jimmy Creech who was a Methodist pastor for thirty years.
BTW,
I don't mention homosexuality after depression, leprosy and eczema to suggest
that homosexuality is a disease. I mention it because I think it's a topic,
like the previous two, that Biblical authors didn't understand completely. We
don't shun lepers any more. We don't shun people with eczema. We don't declare
them hated by God.
It
will be a good day when the entire church decides to acknowledge what is true
to anyone who has eyes: homosexuals are not worse people than heterosexuals,
and the love that homosexuals find in committed, adult, consensual partnerships
is not less, or less necessary, than the love that heterosexuals find in their
committed, adult, consensual partnerships.
No comments:
Post a Comment