How to Fight Anti-Semitism
Bari
Weiss's New Book Misses the Mark
America
needs a good book entitled How to Fight Anti-Semitism.
Though Jews make up 2.2
percent of the US population, Jews constitute 60
percent of religiously motivated hate crime victims. Recent months have
seen a surge of violent attacks on Jews in New York City. The attacks are often
recorded on video. Attackers are often black or Hispanic. The attacks have gone
underreported
and little discussed; one theory is that blacks attacking whites is not the
kind of hate crime the media wants to emphasize.
We require
instruction in fighting anti-Semitism because Israel is a valued US ally, and
Israel's very right to exist is questioned on college campuses and by new
congress members. We need it because though many have considered anti-Semitism
to be a right-wing phenomenon, this hatred is found on the left as well as on
the right; witness British Labor Party leader Jeremy
Corbyn. There are too many anti-Semitic events on university campuses to list.
Various watchdog organizations keep records; one such account is here.
We
need to prepare to fight anti-Semitism because the US has a rising Muslim
population, and as The
Pew Research Center reports, "Anti-Jewish sentiment is endemic in the
Muslim world." Muslim anti-Semitism distorts American history. Significant
percentages of Muslims believe that Jews carried out the 9-11 terror
attacks. Amiri Baraka, once New Jersey's poet laureate, PEN award winner, and
father of Newark's mayor, repeated this conspiracy theory in his poetry.
We
need to understand how to fight anti-Semitism because ignorance of the
Holocaust is a "global
crisis," including
among highly "educated" American millennials. We need to
understand the Holocaust for the same reason we need to fight anti-Semitism.
The villains who begin by attacking Jews never end by attacking Jews. Anti-Semites
are a menace to us all.
Bari
Weiss seems well-positioned to write a groundbreaking book defining and
combatting anti-Semitism in the 21st century. She became bat mitzvah
at Pittsburgh's Tree of Life synagogue, scene of the 2018 mass shooting. Weiss
is a New York Times editor. She's
pretty, charming, and young, and has been a guest on Bill Maher's Real Time HBO show. Though she says she
doesn't want "points" for her sexual identity, she earns them
anyway for once dating Saturday Night
Live superstar Kate McKinnon. Weiss describes herself as a centrist, and
she has been praised for criticizing anti-Semitism from both the left and the
right, from both Christians and Muslims. What's not to like?
Alas,
Weiss's How to Fight Anti-Semitism is
not the book America needs right now. It reads more like a Facebook post by a
bright, passionate, but not particularly scholarly, rigorous, or fair Facebook
friend. How to Fight Anti-Semitism, like
a Facebook post, focuses on current events. It offers currently popular
whipping boys: Western Civilization, Christianity, and President Donald Trump.
Much
of the book consists of one account after another of recent anti-Semitic
incidents: Tree of Life, the attack on the Hypercacher supermarket in Paris,
the kidnapping, torture and murder of Ilan Halimi, the decapitation of Daniel
Pearl, anti-Semitic incidents on American campuses, and others. In a short
while all of these contemporary anecdotes will be dusty and dated. Weiss's
insistence that all incidents involving violence against a Jew can be
understood using the same paradigm is questionable. Are the young black men
violently attacking Jews in New York City really driven by the same motivations
as Pearl's murderers and pogromists in medieval Germany? No evidence is offered
to support this.
Weiss
doesn't get around to her suggestions for fighting anti-Semitism until the
final 37 pages of the 210-page book, and her tips feel grounded more in the
self-help movement than in any serious scholarship, boots-on-the-ground
activism, or skilled self-defense. "Lean into Judaism … Stop blaming
yourself … Tell the truth … Trust your discomfort … Allow for the possibility
of change … Praise those who do the right thing … Maintain your
liberalism" are some of her methods. The suggestions are for Jews, not for
non-Jews who are dedicated to fighting anti-Semitism. Prayer and devotion are
not among Weiss's suggestions. Weiss "resonates" with a
self-definition as a Shinto Jew, that is a Jew who honors her Jewish ancestors.
She is not sure about belief in God.
There's
been a great deal of serious scholarship on the topic of hate in general and
anti-Semitism in particular. There's a massive amount of lived experience on
how to survive as a member of a targeted minority. Ethnographers and former
hate group members offer veritable MRIs of haters' brains. Those abundant resources
are not reflected here.
Weiss
says that the New Testament provides the "template" for
anti-Semitism. "Christianity" is "responsible for the murder of
more Jews than any other ideology on the planet," she writes. Weiss is
wrong on three counts. First, as I'll argue, below, Christians have killed
Jews, but Christianity has not. Second, Nazism, not Christianity, is the ideology
that is responsible for the murder of more Jews than any other. Weiss could
benefit from reading "Against Identifying Nazism with Christianity,"
found here.
Third, Weiss makes this statement as part of a whitewash of Islam. More on
that, below.
In
today's world, every serious person, Christian, Jewish, secular, or other, must
understand the following facts. These facts must be stated not just to Weiss but
to any anti-Semite who seeks rationale for anti-Semitism within the New
Testament. They must also be stated in relation to Islam, which Weiss also
addresses.
The
New Testament was written by Jews, with the possible exception of Luke, who may
or may not have been Jewish. The New Testament was written about a Jew, Jesus.
Jesus and the apostles were Jews, descendants of Abraham, living in Israel,
speaking Jewish Aramaic and using Hebrew in their religious lives. They
followed the Levitical commandments, and they, as do Christians today, regarded
the Old Testament as inspired scripture.
Further,
the New Testament is rooted in the Old. Open to any page of the New Testament
in an annotated Bible and find footnotes directing the reader to parallel
passages in the Old. Mary, the mother of Jesus, recites a song called the
Magnificat. The song's style is that of the synonymous parallelism of Hebrew
poetry. Specifically, Mary's song echoes The Song of Hannah from the Old
Testament book of Samuel. Jesus is asked to identify the greatest commandment;
in his reply, Jesus echoes Deuteronomy and Leviticus. As Jesus dies on the
cross, he speaks words from Psalm 22.
Jews,
no less than Christians, have to wrestle with difficult verses. The Old
Testament contains many hair-raising proclamations where an angry God promises
total devastation to his chosen people. In Hosea 13-14:5-15,1 God says he will
be like a lion or bear and tear Israelites' hearts from their breasts and
fetuses from pregnant wombs. This is terrible stuff, but depicting God as so
angry at sin that he exerts graphic punishment is part of the Jewish scriptural
tradition, a tradition in which the Jews writing the New Testament were
steeped. Jews and Christians must work together to interpret these verses.
There
are no verses in the New Testament calling on Christians to kill anyone,
including Jews. Rather, the message of the New Testament can be summed up in
one verse: "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that
everyone who believes in him might not perish but might have eternal life."
The Parable of the Good Samaritan is groundbreaking. Its message is that we are
to love those unlike ourselves, including the most hated other. Jesus, after
torture and near death, said, "Father forgive them." This is the
message of the New Testament.
Yes, haters
have used verses from the New Testament to rationalize anti-Semitism and
violence against Jews. While acknowledging this, we must not elevate
haters' twisted logic.
The
Old Testament, no less than the New, has been blamed for atrocity. For
centuries, those who support slavery and serfdom cited the Biblical "Curse
of Ham." Eve's eating the apple, precipitating exile from the Garden of
Eden, has been cited as the source of misogyny. Exodus 22:18 has been blamed
for Europe's witch craze, and Leviticus 20:13 has been blamed for all
homophobia.
I
don't have to wonder how Bari Weiss would feel if I were to advance the Old
Testament as the "template" for slavery, for misogyny, for crazed mob
killings, or for homophobia. I know she would feel the outrage I feel when I
read her citing the New Testament as the "template" for
anti-Semitism. Not just outrage, but logic, renders all these arguments
invalid. Clearly the message of Exodus, of "Let My People Go," is one
of a God who wants people to be free, not enslaved. The Old Testament is alone
in world scripture for featuring real, named, average women as driving
characters: Sarah, Rebecca, Leah, Rachel, Ruth, Naomi, Judith, Esther, Hannah,
Hagar, Rahab, Deborah, Jael, Tamar, Shiphrah, Puah, and Jochabed. When it comes
to the Biblically-mandated death penalty for witchcraft or homosexuality, Jews
mention the Talmud's anti-death penalty stance. Further, we know that slavery, misogyny,
homophobia, and mob killings are found in cultures untouched by the Bible.
Anti-Semites'
distorted interpretations of the New Testament are not the alpha and omega of
Jewish-Christian relations, but that is all Weiss talks about. She does not
mention that again and again popes and everyday Christians have put their lives
on the line to fight against anti-Semitism. The sixteenth-century Council of
Trent insisted that humanity, primarily Christians, are responsible for the
death of Jesus. The twelfth-century papal bull Sicut Judaies insisted
that Christians must not harm Jews; this bull had several antecedents and
descendants. Weiss mentions France's persecution of Captain Alfred Dreyfus, but
not his defense by devout Catholic Charles Peguy.
Weiss
blames the Rintfleisch massacres, a medieval German pogrom, on the Catholic
doctrine of transubstantiation and, as she puts it, "a wafer," that
is, to me and other Catholics, the Eucharist. Weiss claims that "one
hundred thousand Jews were murdered." I cannot find her number supported
in other sources.
In
fact the pogrom to which she refers was sparked by debt. A man indebted to Jews
invented a story of abuse of a Eucharist in order to excuse a pogrom. Weiss
does not mention that some Christians attempted to assist persecuted Jews, or
that when the local monarch regained lost power he put the man who stirred up
the pogrom to death.
Why
do these details matter? Why must we mention that Catholic doctrine does not
mandate that Christians murder Jews, that communion is indeed holy to Catholics
and that attributing to communion the power to murder Jews is profoundly
inaccurate, that not all Christians, even in the midst of a medieval pogrom,
were murderers? Why must one mention the class elements at play?
These
details matter because Christians like me are on the front lines in condemning
anti-Semitism wherever we encounter it, no matter the social cost. It matters
because Christians like my father risked their lives fighting, and defeating,
anti-Semitic fascism in World War II. It matters because Christians are the
most persecuted faith group in the world today, and when you equate a religion
– Christianity – with a crime – anti-Semitism – you make Christians less safe. Why
bother protecting Christians if their belief system is the font of worldwide
evil? These details matter because Weiss's analysis is wrong. The New Testament
is not the template for anti-Semitism, and one must understand the historical
factors at work in hate.
Weiss's
tendency to leave out key facts occurs more than once in How to Fight Anti-Semitism. She bashes Breitbart as anti-Semitic.
Proof? Breitbart called Bill Kristol a "renegade Jew." Weiss does not
mention that the author of that very column was David Horowitz, who is himself
Jewish.
Weiss
insists that she was subjected to internet abuse after her appearance on the
Joe Rogan show because she is Jewish. During her appearance, Weiss smeared
Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard as an "Assad toadie" and as a supporter
of conversion therapy. Rogan challenged Weiss. Weiss floundered, acknowledging
that she didn't know the meaning of the word "toadie." She continued
to insist that Gabbard was pro-conversion therapy. In fact Gabbard supported
conversion therapy when she was a teenager. She has since renounced that
support. The most popular critical comments on YouTube accuse Weiss of
being arrogant and unaware of facts. The most popular comments do not mention
Weiss's Jewishness.
Weiss
cites Nathan Hannover, the seventeenth-century chronicler of the 1648-1657
Khmelnytsky Uprising of Ukrainian Cossacks against Polish domination. Weiss describes
tortures committed by Ukrainians against Jews. It looks, again, like what we
have is those evil Christians doing bad things to Jews because they are
Christian and Christians hate Jews. Weiss does not mention that the Khmelnytsky
Uprising, which, to her, is all about Christian Ukrainians expressing their
innate, Christian anti-Semitism, is recorded in Polish history as part of
"The Deluge," a catastrophic series of attacks against Poland in the
seventeenth century. She doesn't mention that Christian Ukrainians tortured
Christian Poles, thus, it can't be explained away as "Those awful
Christians inevitably acting out their innate anti-Semitism caused by their
religion." The tortures of the Khmelnytsky Uprising were repeated
centuries later. In the 1940s, during the Volhynian Slaughter, Ukrainians again
tortured and murdered Poles. One hundred thousand Poles were killed. Priests
were crucified. The genocidal goal was to obliterate any biological or cultural
Polish presence. Weiss doesn't mention that the very historian she cites,
Nathan Hannover, himself speaks of Jewish oppression of Ukrainian peasants.
My
friend John Guzlowski's family members were raped, tortured, dismembered, and
murdered by Ukrainians and Nazi allies. I do not hesitate to acknowledge that the
people who tortured my friend's family were, in their own minds, exacting
revenge on Poles for previous mistreatment. Acknowledging this history does not
justify Ukrainians torturing and murdering my friend's family. Acknowledging
this history contributes to understanding. Weiss, though, rejects any
integration of historical details into her analysis of anti-Semitism.
"This kind of logic" she says "excuses anti-Semitism." No,
placing attacks in context does not excuse anti-Semitism or any other violence.
Rather, fully understanding atrocity is perhaps the only way out of atrocity.
Weiss
extracts events from historical context. Those atrocities are simply just more
examples of Christians hating Jews just because they are Christians, and that's
what Christians do. Weiss also extracts anti-Semitism from the context of other
hatreds. Anti-Semitism, she insists, has nothing in common with hatred of any
other people from any other group. Study of hate and atrocity in general, she
seems to feel, cannot add to understanding of anti-Semitism.
Other
scholars have taken a different approach. One such scholar is Edna Bonacich; another
is Amy
Chua. Bonacich is a rabbi's daughter. Chua's aunt was murdered by her
Filipino chauffeur. Both scholars struggled with the problem of hate. Their
work describes a variety of populations that have experienced prejudice, atrocity,
and exile. Bonacich calls these populations "middleman minorities."
Chua calls them "market-dominant minorities." Bonacich, Chua, and Thomas Sowell,
who has also taken up this topic, write not just about Jews in Europe, but also
Chinese in Malaysia, Indians in East Africa, Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, Koreans
in Los Angeles, and others. My own take on the middleman theory at play in
Polish-Jewish relations can be seen here. Weiss never
mentions these scholars' work. Even if Weiss wanted to reject Bonacich's theory,
she should at least have addressed it.
Rather,
Weiss chooses an ahistorical and disease-model approach. She says anti-Semitism
can't be defined because it is a "shape-shifter" that
"slithers" away from definition. Anti-Semitism cannot be understood
alongside any other hatred. Rather, anti-Semitism is "an intellectual
disease," "a deeply rooted and highly infectious thought virus
carried in the DNA of Western culture." Every participant in Western
civilization carries this virus. When stress affects the immune system, you
break out in a case of anti-Semitism. "The virus will out." "Anti-Semitism
is baked into the very foundations of the world we inhabit." Anti-Semitism
is "an essential scaffolding for Western civilization." It is
"one of the basic tools with which that edifice was constructed." Thus,
anti-Semitism is "a culturally inherited disease."
If
you think you are not infected with the anti-Semitism virus, if you think you
actually like Jews, Weiss will correct you. "A philo-Semite is an anti-Semite
who likes Jews." Did no one reviewing this book at the editing stage
realize how offensive this is, or how close it is to Nazi ideology that
compared Jews to a disease?
Weiss
misrepresents the Jewish experience in the United States, and her misrepresentation
is not a minor matter. Jews succeeded in America without having to sacrifice
their Jewishness, she says. Their success proves that America is better than,
say, Poland, a country she mentions several times, always disparagingly . In
fact Jewishness in Poland and America were completely different phenomena. In
Poland, Jews spoke a different language, Yiddish, than the rest of the
population, they wore distinctive dress, they did not marry non-Jews, and they
occupied a caste-like status in the primitive economy. Those conditions don't
exist in the US. Where they are even slightly replicated, tension erupts.
Weiss
mentions the 1915 lynching of Leo Frank in Georgia. She depicts Frank's murder
as an unchanging expression of Christian hatred for Jews. She does not mention
the economic and regional tensions at work. Frank was a Yankee, and Mary
Phagan, the girl he was alleged to have killed, was a 13-year-old local girl
working in his factory. She'd gone to work at age 10. There was much tension
among poor, Southern whites because their children were doing hard, low-paying
work in factories owned by non-locals. None of these economic and social details
excuses the lynching of Leo Frank. All of them must be adduced fully to
understand what happened to Frank.
University
of Iowa Professor Stephen G. Bloom's superb 2001 book Postville: A Clash of Cultures in Heartland America offers a contrast
to Weiss's approach. Bloom describes cultural and economic tension between non-Jewish
Iowans and newly arriving Orthodox Jews in one rural town. Bloom offers a
thorough history and rich ethnography based on his penetration of the local
community. He does not write off tensions as resulting from
"diseased" Christian Iowans just giving in to their innate,
undefinable, anti-Semitism virus. He describes daily interactions that go
wrong, and that can be addressed and changed for the better for everyone involved.
If
there is one antagonist in Weiss's book, it is President Donald Trump. He has,
she argues, eroded standards of civility that protect minorities like Jews. She
categorizes as anti-Semitic Trump telling The Squad to go back to where they
came from. I'm no Trump apologist and I acknowledge that Trump is uncivil. But
Weiss misses that Trump's successful incivility is an epiphenomenon, a backlash
against a more powerful social force. Trump did not invent incivility. Have a
look at the utterly vile, misogynist and classist insults that liberals hurled
at Alaska Governor Sarah Palin when she first appeared on the national stage. Look
at how liberals use the word "white" to denigrate human beings. Listen
to what squad members Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar say about America. When
Trump supporters hear Trump's incivility, they hear a champion standing up for
them against an all powerful Political Correctness that has suppressed and
demonized them.
Similarly,
Weiss could, but she does not, cite ethnographic research on those online hate
group members she rants against. Christian Picciolini, a former hate group
member, says that young men are susceptible to hate groups because they need
identity, community, and purpose. Modern schools, popular culture, and other
socializing forces in America all too often do not provide these vital gifts to
young white men. Rather, the powers that be drill into them that they are
shameful racists, sexists, and responsible for all the world's woes. Weiss does
acknowledge that the left creates a vacuum by refusing to create a healthy
patriotism and pride. But she insists that Western Civilization is inherently
diseased, so she undermines her own argument.
Weiss
opens her chapter on Islam with her description of the Rintfleisch massacres.
Holy communion makes Catholics kill Jews: a Politically Correct way of opening
a chapter meant to discuss Islamic anti-Semitism. Weiss goes on to indict
Christianity as the "ideology" that is responsible for the murder of
more Jews than any other. She relativizes. The New Testament is just like the
Koran because both contain "terrible lines about Jews." Weiss says
that Jews lived comparatively well in Muslim lands until recently, when Christian
colonizers arrived, bringing anti-Semitism with them. Surprisingly, she also
cites the creation of the state of Israel as a cause of Islamic anti-Semitism.
I
sent my impressions of Weiss's comments about Islam to Robert Spencer. As far
as I know, he has not read Weiss's book, so his reaction is to my summary of
it. He wrote back to me, "This is howlingly false. Antisemitism is deeply
embedded in the Quran and Sunnah. See the citations here.
There is also a great deal of antisemitism in Islamic tradition and Islamic history.
See my book The
History of Jihad."
In
addition to the anti-Semitism in the Koran, one must be aware of the following.
Mohammed, the founder of Islam, unlike Jesus, was not a Jew. He did not live in
Israel. He did not speak Jewish Aramaic or understand Biblical Hebrew. Islam
denigrates the Bible, saying that Jews and Christians corrupted the message
they received from Allah. Mohammed was sent to correct that corruption.
Christians read the Old Testament every day. People in Muslims countries have
been tortured for being in possession of a Bible. Islam
rewrites Jesus as desiring to destroy Christianity. The Koran insists that Abraham was not a Jew.
Weiss mentions none of this.
And
this is one of the reasons why every citizen, no matter their personal faith
life, must understand my lengthy comments, above, about Christianity and
anti-Semitism. If Weiss is correct, Christianity is evil and should be
eliminated. She's not correct. The New Testament is not like the Koran. In
Jesus's sayings and behavior, there is no exhortation to, or celebration of,
killing Jews or anyone else.
The
same cannot be said about the Koran, hadith, and Sunnah. Readers should expose
themselves to the sources Robert Spencer cites, above. The Koran repeatedly and
explicitly calls for the killing and torture of non-Muslims. It says that Allah
turned Jews into apes and pigs. As part of daily prayer, Muslims repeat seventeen
times a day that Jews anger Allah (and that Christians go astray.) There is
no comparison between the Islamic approach to Jews and Judaism and the
Christian approach.
Christians
like me, indeed Polish Catholics like me, oppose anti-Semitism with everything
we've got. We do so because of, not in spite of, our Christian faith and investment
in Western civilization. I am not diseased because I am a Christian and a
Westerner. I am blessed. My faith and my civilization give tools I would not
otherwise have to dismantle hate. I hope those who see the world as Weiss does
learn to recognize people like me as allies.
Persons
who are neither Christian nor Jewish need to understand, as well. We live in
the age of the Clash of Civilizations and that clash is taking place in local
schools. Young people need to know that their heritage is worth cherishing, and
they need to understand the challenges presented by other worldviews.
Danusha
Goska is the author of God
through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery
No comments:
Post a Comment