Emerald Cockroach Wasp Ampulex Compressa Lenny Worthington, Photographer. |
People
say you never change anyone's mind on the internet. Not true. I seek to have my
mind changed through the internet and any other source of information.
When
the Republican primary debates began, I watched them eagerly. I knew almost
nothing about Donald Trump and I was ready to vote for him if he proved himself
worthy of my vote. I defended him against Facebook friends who called him a
Nazi. Ask Facebook friend Maria Elena Gonzalez, who denounced me in
melodramatic terms.
It
was only after Trump revealed his mind and character that I realized I didn't
want to vote for him.
After
the primaries ended and it became clear that Trump and Clinton would be the
major party nominees, I read Facebook eagerly. I wanted to know if my
anti-Clinton Facebook friends were correct. Was she the anti-Christ, and should
I vote for a third party candidate, or at least plan an insurrection?
I
followed the links my anti-Clinton Facebook friends posted. I rapidly
discovered three things:
Anti-Trump
links tended to be to mainstream news sources, from the NYT to the Wa Po, to
CNN. Anti-Clinton links tended to be to fringe websites overloaded with ads
that made my anti-virus software kick into "danger, danger" gear.
Anti-Clinton
links were accompanied by physically unattractive photos that emphasized that
she is an older woman with wrinkled and sagging flesh. You can photograph an
older person to make them look wise and deep. You can also photograph them to
make them look hideous. Facebook friends, strangely enough including older
women, were choosing photos of Clinton that made her look like a bag of sag, a
hag.
The
third thing about these links: a good percentage were outright false. That
Clinton had "recently" "fallen" and that that
"fall" revealed that she was dying. False. That she had paid Khizr
Khan $375,000 to speak at the DNC. False. That she had announced plans to
rescind the second amendment. False. That she had embraced sharia as pro-woman.
False.
I
rapidly lost faith in anti-Clinton articles. She may well be the anti-Christ;
the boy-who-cried-wolf principle applies.
I was
still ready to be convinced, if not to vote for Trump, at the very least to
vote *against* Clinton. The anti-Clinton posts in my Facebook feed, relying, as
they did on fringe falsehoods and misogyny, swayed me closer to voting *for*
her.
Because
I disagree with Clinton about so very much, I continue to ask myself, "Can
I / should I vote Trump?" Yes. I do. I still ask myself that.
Yesterday,
Facebook friend Joe Palinsky shared a Rolling Stone article, "How
Donald Trump Lost His Mojo," by Matt Taibbi. Taibbi outlined how
Trump's stump speeches are now confused: He occasionally bursts out in the
incoherent, abrasive braggadocio that won him his fans, but he also slips into
politically correct embraces of blacks and Hispanics. During a recent speech,
Trump shouted that during his administration, "African-American citizens
and Latino citizens will have the time of their life!"
Noting
Trump's current brown-nosing of the very special interest groups he had
previously spoken down to, The Atlantic Monthly published, "The
Cowardice of Donald Trump." That article carefully documents Trump
saying scathingly critical things about blacks and Hispanics – when speaking to
white audiences – and then praising and sucking up to blacks and Hispanics when
speaking to blacks and Hispanics.
And
this is where amupulex compressa, the emerald cockroach wasp, comes in.
Anti-Hillary
voices have been insisting to me, "Sure, Donald Trump is a buffoon and we
all wish he were not the nominee, but he is the will of the people. But that's
okay, because we will control him. We will tell him whom to place on the Supreme
Court. We will be driving the car. He will merely be a figurehead, or bobble-head,
to entertain the ignorant masses who chose him."
And
*that* is supposed to be *less* diabolical and safer for our nation than voting
for Hillary Clinton.
The
powers-that-be, the men-behind-the-curtain, the unseen-hands, have been trying
to bring Trump to heel for months now. Paul Manafort couldn't do it; he was
kicked out. Corey Lewandwoski, who notoriously manhandled a female reporter
couldn't do it.
Who
is doing it?
A
parasitic wasp has finally gained entry to Trump's brain.
Parasitic
wasps inject a neurotoxin into the brains of the insects they parasitize. Ampulex
compressa parasitizes cockroaches. After subduing the cockroach, the wasp lays
her eggs in the zombie-fied cockroach. The cockroach lives long enough to do
the wasp's will. Once its mission is finished and her eggs hatch, the cockroach
dies.
Who
is now controlling Donald Trump? Ironically enough, it is, like the much vilified
Hillary Clinton, an older, unattractive woman: Kellyanne Conway. She is the new
campaign manager who is steering around this new, neutered version of Trump,
the mojo-less Trump who sucks up to blacks, Hispanics, immigrants and migrating
Muslims, as documented in Rolling Stone and The Atlantic.
And
*this,* ladies and gentlemen, is supposed to be less diabolical than electing
Hillary Clinton, a woman who has been in the public eye for most of her life, and
whom we all know. She's obnoxious; we all agree. I disagree with her on just
about everything, except the necessity for public professionalism and
behind-the-scenes competence.
No. I
cannot vote for a shell being manipulated by the unseen, and unvetted
machinations of parasitic wasps.
To me, both candidates are wholly unacceptable. Unfortunately, one will win. If you liked the Obama years, then vote for Hillary and get more of the same - bad foreign policy, bad economic policy and just as much racial healing. Trump may at least accidentally follow some conservative principles. If nothing else, the media will be watching Trump through an electron microscope and shouting out problems with a megaphone. Hillary? She will get a free pass no matter what bad policy she promotes.
ReplyDelete