Iran-Born
Shiite Muslim, Marxist, Catholic Convert, Conservative Author, and Ardent Trump
Supporter
Sohrab
Ahmari was born in Iran, grew up Muslim, immigrated to Utah in the United
States, became a Marxist, left Marxism, became a conservative journalist, and
converted to Catholicism in 2016, when he was 31 years old. His 2019 memoir, From
Fire by Water, describes this journey.
Ahmari
made national headlines with his May, 2019 First Things op-ed, "Against
David Frenchism." In that piece, Ahmari argued that Christians must resist
cultural trends like drag
queen story hour and the "paganized ideology" of "elite
institutions." Christians must "fight the culture war with the aim of
defeating the enemy and enjoying the spoils in the form of a public square
re-ordered to the common good and ultimately the Highest Good." Donald
Trump, Ahmari argued, is the Christians' ally in this culture war against pagan
ideology. Trump has shifted politics and culture "away from
autonomy-above-all toward order, continuity, and social cohesion. He believes
that the political community – and not just the church, family, and individual
– has its own legitimate scope for action. He believes it can help protect the
citizen from transnational forces beyond his control."
Ahmari's
piece touched off a widespread debate among conservatives. Critics accused
Ahmari of arguing for a Christian theocracy in the US. His article could have
been titled "For Theocracy," said
Nico Perrino of FIRE, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education.
I
could not wait to read From Fire by Water. I imagined it would be like Seeking
Allah; Finding Jesus by Nabeel Qureshi, Nonie Darwish's Wholly
Different, and Mosab Hassan Yusef's Son
of Hamas. All these books dramatically recount their authors'
conversion from Islam to Christianity. I also thought From Fire by Water would
be like David Horowitz's Radical Son and Mortality
and Faith, memoirs that also follow the journey of a former
leftist who became a prominent conservative author.
In
fact From Fire by Water is not like any of these books. Ahmari was never
much of a Muslim, in spite of growing up in Iran, and his journey was more gradual,
cerebral, solitary, and bookish than those of the previously mentioned authors.
Initial
news accounts of Ahmari's conversion often mischaracterized his journey.
"If I was reacting against anything, it was against the materialism and
relativism that had taken root in the West beginning in the nineteenth century.
I had turned my back against Marx, Nietzsche, and Foucault, not the prophet
Muhammad, whose religion had left only faint imprints on my soul by the time I
entered adulthood."
Ahmari's
Iranian family was not particularly observant of Islam. They were members of
the well-to-do educated elite, living in Tehran, the capital city. Their faith
"such as it was," "amounted to a kind of liberal sentimental
ecumenism." Islam was worthwhile insofar as it contained some humanistic
elements. Zoroastrianism was revered because it arose in ancient Persia.
Christianity "was simply wonderful, a gentle, Western religion."
Armenian Christians in Iran were his family's source for wine, arak, and
salami.
"I
thought I was American before I ever set foot in the United States," he
writes. He arrived just before turning 14 years old. He already spoke English
fluently, with an American accent he had picked up from the movies. He had
concluded that the West was superior to Iran, based on the elegant packaging of
Toblerone chocolate bars. Relatives returning from trips West brought with them
the scent of a better world. Iran smelled of "dust mingled with stale
rosewater." Iranian culture alternated between "burning, ideological
rage" and "mournful nostalgia." Iranian narratives were informed
by fatalism that dictated misfortune. In Western narratives, heroes confronted
obstacles that they overcame, all through their own gumption. In the West,
"an individual mattered as an individual." In contrast, a boy who
donned a suicide vest and threw himself at an Iraqi tank was one prototypical
Iranian hero.
Ahmari
writes that he would eventually discover that those Western action heroes,
capable of changing their own fate, were not rooted in the careful packaging of
Toblerone bars, Western air freshener, or any other expression of consumer-item
superiority. Eventually, he says, "I would find the heart of the West
somewhere entirely different – in events that took place on a dusty,
bloodstained hilltop on the outskirts of ancient Jerusalem."
Niloofar,
Ahmari's mother, studied abstract expressionist painting at a university. Ahmari
tells us that she was "sweet tempered, mild to a fault, and something of a
great beauty," but he never tells us much more about her.
The
author describes his father Parviz at greater length. Parviz Ahmari was
unconventional, a man of "sensuous self-indulgence" and "utterly
incapable of restraining his passions." He smoked and drank heavily, and
was "a thoroughly irresponsible husband and father … rumors of mistresses,
gambling, and opium addiction swirled around him."
"All
Iranians had to perfect the art of leading double lives." Young Sohrab had
to be trained not to talk about his family's behavior in front of strangers who
might deliver his family members to government imprisonment or torture. A
family friend was caught with cassettes of Western music and flogged. "The
skin on his back" looked "permanently like challah bread." Ahmari's
family was once interrogated for two hours because there was an unrelated man
in the same car with his parents. The police suggested that the only reason the
man was there was for a planned ménage-à-trois. As in Iran's theocracy, children
must also be trained in communist dictatorships. Don't tell strangers what
books mommy and daddy read, what jokes they tell, what foods they consume, and
what company they keep.
Alcohol
is forbidden in Islam, but the Ahmari family attended parties where alcohol was
served. Unrelated men and women mingled at these parties. When discovered by the
komiteh or morality police, the police would lecture them sternly,
accusing them of behaving like customers at a whorehouse. The Ahmaris and
others had to empty their pockets to pay bribes. Upon receiving the bribes, the
komiteh would be on their way, forgetting any question of upholding public
virtue.
Similar
hypocrisy reigned in schools. One teacher upbraided Sohrab for his
"Westoxication," an Islamist slur for Iranians who valued the West.
That same teacher kept Sohrab after school in order to access his family's
"movie guy," who provided bootlegged, contraband videotapes of
Western films. The West-hating Muslim teacher wanted to see Titanic. When
Sohrab and his mother announced their move to America, this same devout Muslim
teacher, eager to condemn "Westoxication," asked Niloofar about the
green card process. "He, too, hankered for the Great Satan's
embrace."
As in
other authoritarian systems, the worst rose to the top. One Koran teacher was a
sadist in sweat-stained, ill-fitting clothes, "the very type of the
uncouth provincial who, thanks to the revolution, had suddenly come to wield
great authority in a big-city school." He forced children to assume stress
positions for extended periods and sent them reeling with his blows. "Mr.
Sadeghi was a bruiser." Sadeghi trained children in regarding
self-sacrifice for Islam as the highest good. Remembering Hussein, a Shiite
hero, "the sound of some four hundred men and boys beating their chests
filled the schoolyard."
The
family's live-in maid, a "homely, illiterate old woman," told little
Sohrab ghost and djinn stories. "All of her stories had the same
moral … it was always the skeptical characters whom the djinn would drag
into the netherworld." Ahmari became an atheist around age 12. Ahmari
realized he had made the break with his childhood belief when he stopped
believing in djinn. Ahmari says that "if the Islamic Republic
collapsed one day, it would leave behind the world's largest community of
atheists."
In
1998, Ahmari, his mother and grandmother immigrated to Utah. A bookish boy, he
rapidly became a teacher's darling. In classroom debates, he would argue for
infanticide in order to get a rise out of others. He considered himself a
nihilist and began to read Friedrich Nietzsche. Ahmari read Thus Spake
Zarathustra "belly down on my bed … barely stepping out to eat and
wash." "Values are relative," he learned. "What was wrong
for the many was, perhaps, right for the few … all faith is but a fanciful tale
that helps weak minds cope … organized religion is a con played by the hustling
cleric on his gullible flock."
Seeing
similarities between Nietzsche's concept of the Ubermensch and the communist
concept of the vanguard that would lead the mass of men to a brighter future,
"by the age of eighteen, I was quite literally a card-carrying
Communist." Ahmari changed colleges and traveled from Utah to Washington
in order to be closer to communist comrades. By the time he joined the Party,
communism had already been discredited by the fall of the Soviet Union. Why,
then, did he join? "The thrill of épater les bourgeois" and to
act out his disappointment that the American he migrated to was not the America
of his childhood imaginings.
Ahmari
continued to spend days reading, no doubt belly down on his bed. He worked
through Foucault, Lyotard, Baudrillard, and Judith Butler. He hung out with
other "cool" guys, also readers. He drank and often woke up painfully
hungover and wondering what he had done the night before. "In those black
hours, it did me no good to recall that all moral norms are historically
contingent or that resisting Western hegemony Is the duty of the
subaltern." He would pray, and then feel ashamed of himself for praying.
Ahmari
graduated college and joined Teach for America. This was the turning point. No
longer was Ahmari lying belly-down on his bed, alone in his room, reading.
Suddenly he was responsible for other young lives. "At the slightest
contact with reality, much of the bosh that clouded my mind dissipated." Ahmari
met Yossi, an Israeli-American. They almost had a physical fight. Yossi once
called Ahmari an "anti-Semitic piece of garbage." But Yossi's example
would change Ahmari's life.
Yossi
went against the Teach for America grain. He did not teach his students to feel
like helpless victims and future troops in inevitable class warfare. Yossi
demanded order, responsibility, and consequences. Observing Yossi's example,
Ahmari concluded, "Character and virtue, then, preceded material
circumstances; leftist ideology put the cart before the horse. People and their
conduct weren't reducible to language, race, class, and collective
identities."
These
reflections caused Ahmari to realize that there is an internal measure of
virtue. From whence that internal guide, if there is no God? Ahmari educated
himself about the dark side of communism. He concluded that "To restrain
man's hand against man, he has to be bound by some absolute authority outside
himself … How was it possible to uphold the dignity of the person if there
wasn't something special about his origins?"
Ahmari
found the answer to these questions in the Judeo-Christian tradition.
"Western democracies were morally superior … because they still hewed to a
Judeo-Christian line … if I savored the ordered liberty that I saw around me, I
had to give credit to the religious ideals that had given birth to it."
Eventually he would come to conclude that "A skeptical and infertile West
lacked the spiritual resource to deal with an energetic and virile Islam … To
deal humanely and intelligently with Islam … Americans and Europeans needed to
honor their own Judeo-Christian roots."
One
Sunday evening, afraid of appearing a "gullible sap," Ahmari walked
into a Catholic church. During the re-enactment of the Last Supper, he broke
into sobs. "I was in the proximity of an awesome and mysterious force, a
force bound up with sacrifice, with self-giving unto death."
As
ever, books brought him around, specifically, Robert Alter's The Five Books
of Moses and Joseph Ratzinger's Jesus of Nazareth. The universality
and timelessness of the Bible caused him to ask if the Bible was the work of
"human hands alone." The Bible is simply not comparable to other
religious works that are thousands of years old. Most Pagan texts are "of
merely archaeological, historical, or literary interest; the Torah was a living
text that spoke fresh truths across a distance of three thousand years." The
story of the Fall offers a truer insight than can be found in more recent
attempts to explain human nature. People are broken, and no intervention, short
of Jesus' sacrifice, will fix us. Of course Ahmari read Augustine. "All
false doctrines, Augustine said, seek to negate man's responsibility for
sin."
From
Fire by Water is
largely a journal of books read and interior life. One chapter, "The House
on the Cape of Olives," stands out as quite different. Ahmari describes,
on journalistic assignment, posing as an Iranian migrant traveling along the route
from countries like Afghanistan into Europe. This chapter evokes Ahmari's
experience vividly. A group of men hide out in a migrant safe house. The house
is crawling with cockroaches. "Migration itself is a form of jihad!"
one insists. Another man, a sadistic bully, torments an effeminate boy. This
chapter is brief but unforgettable. Ahmari includes it, he says, to demonstrate
what a hell on earth human beings can make for each other, absent God.
Again,
From Fire by Water is not like the other memoirs I had read about
Muslims converting to Christianity or left-wingers moving right. It is very
much a book about a man for whom reading big-name authors is a primary
activity. I was truly astounded by the "Cape of Olives" chapter
because I had begun to wonder if Ahmari could write narrative prose with
description, characters, and plot. Clearly he can, and he can do so superbly.
I'm a
more plebian Catholic than Ahmari. My religion is less about what I read and
more about what I do, and how I interact with others. As a woman, I was
troubled by the relative silence of women in this text. Clearly Ahmari's mother
is a key figure, but he says next to nothing about her. Yes, there are Islamic
constraints on how much a man can discuss his mother in public. But Ahmari does
vividly describe what appear to be two prostitutes who try to drum up business
during his assignment as a faux migrant.
For
this review to be complete, I have to mention Ahmari's insistence on
unquestioning obedience to clerical authority. Ahmari was instructed in
Catholicism by a priest who asked him few questions, and invited no discussion.
"This was catechesis, not a dialogue … what, really, did I have to say to
the Church that she needed to hear? Nothing."
Ahmari's
silent, unquestioning submission is very much not exemplary of Biblical or
Church tradition. God converses with humans, including the lowliest, throughout
the Bible. Adam, Cain, Abraham, Sarah, Moses, The Samaritan Woman at the Well,
all converse, argue, debate and bargain with God or angels, voicing their most
mundane concerns, which God takes seriously. Hannah, a woman shunned because of
her barrenness, named her son "Samuel," meaning "Heard by
God." Jacob's name was changed to "Israel," "He who wrestles
with God," after Jacob did just that. St. Teresa of Avila, a Doctor of the
Church, complained to God about falling in mud. She also griped about her
wagons getting stuck in mud. "If this is how you treat your friends, no
wonder you have so few of them," she famously said, to the creator of the
universe.
Ahmari
acknowledges an accusation made by not a few critics. "Had I found in the
Catholic faith a way to express the reactionary longings of my Persian
soul?" I don't know. I do know that unquestioning obedience to Catholic
clerics has a spotty history in recent days. I think, of course, of the
clerical abuse crisis. My Catholic Church is a church that can handle
questions, and provide answers, and participate in dialogue.
My
other hesitation about From Fire by Water. I keep thinking of that young
man "belly down" on his bed, reading some great author or other.
Ahmari details his own history from influential author to influential author. I
wish From Fire by Water had provided the reader with greater assurance
that Ahmari is finally home, and he won't be moving to any new ideology any
time soon. He does provide a careful roadmap. Nihilism, Marxism and
postmodernism left him with questions, questions that were answered
overwhelmingly during the mass' reenactment of the Last Supper. I just wish I
could feel more secure that my new brother in faith won't go through the
process he has gone through before, that is, finding a new author or ideology
that refutes the previous one.
Danusha
Goska is the author of God
through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery
This review first appeared in Front Page Magazine here
This review first appeared in Front Page Magazine here
No comments:
Post a Comment