Fleabag
Is the BBC series the feminist
masterpiece critics claim it to be?
Back when I was a grad student I thought
someday I'd have a tenure-track job and I'd be teaching popular culture courses
so I need to keep up. I was so dedicated to this mythical tenure-track job that
I sat through films that bored me silly. I'm talking to you, Star Wars, Star
Trek, Lord of the Rings, and Harry Potter. I never got that
tenure-track job and, furthermore, popular culture splintered like a dropped
mirror. When I was a kid, families watched movies together. Suddenly pop
culture was a prison; each inmate occupied his own cell sealed off from society.
Two people could live in the same home and dance to different music, laugh at
different jokes, fear different monsters, and never have any idea what the
other person is feeling.
The splintering of pop culture coincided
with the West's increasing rejection of traditional beliefs like
Judeo-Christian morality. A newly Paganizing, newly splintered pop culture knew
it could break all the rules. I remember the first time I heard the F-word in a
broadcast, and the first time I saw the F-word in print. Do I say all these bad
words? Sure. Do I want them in my cultural products? Not unless they are needed.
Somehow Sophocles, Shakespeare, O'Neill and the Marx Brothers never needed any
of them . Movies like Saw include scenes that I do not want inside my
head, or anybody's head for that matter. Splintered media now includes niche markets
for the death-to-America demographic, the school-shooter-wannabe demographic,
the torture-porn demographic.
I would insist to my students that
studying film, fairy tales, and internet memes is every bit as important as
studying physics. The movie someone watches, and the internet memes someone
shares, are a "royal road to the unconscious." Have you ever lost a
friend because of the meme she shares? I have. I liked Gert a lot. Then I saw
her social media memes. So sexually graphic they could illustrate an anatomy
lecture, but always sadistic and always disseminating some deadly conspiracy
theory. I learned more about Gert from her memes than from eating lunch with
her. Goodbye, Gert.
Do cultural products create reality or do
they reflect reality? Does a TV show become popular because it is telling
audiences who they are, or do media puppet masters jerk the audience's strings
and manipulate behavior? It's a feedback loop.
A few years ago I began to hear of
something called Fleabag; Fleabag is a groundbreaking feminist masterpiece,
cultural arbiters wanted me to know. Fleabag was telling women who they
are, who they should want to be, and who they should become. The sources
telling me this are sources that are hostile to women like me, and they are
sources that promote art that I find worthless. So I avoided Fleabag during
its run, 2016-2019.
The other day, 47-year-old Irish actor Andrew Scott appeared on the NPR talk show Fresh Air. He mentioned that he'd played a character named "Hot Priest" on Fleabag. And I thought, okay, I have to watch this show. I'll never get that tenure-track job, but I'm still interested in how popular culture depicts Catholicism.
Fleabag was written by and stars Phoebe Waller-Bridge.
It was produced by Amazon and BBC Three. There are twelve episodes of about
half an hour each. Fleabag is a "dramedy" about the sex life
and family life of a woman named only "Fleabag," played by
Waller-Bridge, who was born in 1985. Fleabag was a critical and audience
darling. It won Bafta, Emmy, and Golden Globe awards. Fleabag enjoys a
100% professional reviewer score on Rotten Tomatoes. In comparison, Lawrence
of Arabia, one of the greatest films ever made, has only a 94% professional
reviewer rating at Rotten Tomatoes.
The New Yorker, the New York
Times, the Guardian and even First Things, a Catholic
publication, slathered superlatives all over Fleabag. Fleabag was
telling big, big TRUTHS about womanhood that no one else dare tell. First
Things, which declares itself "America's most influential journal of
religion and public life," blesses Fleabag as "brilliantly-crafted,
inventive, and witty." "Fleabag's' soliloquy on menopause is
the best three minutes of TV ever," insists Mary McNamara in the L. A. Times. Yeah,
that moon landing, Walter Cronkite announcing Kennedy's death, and Whitney
Houston singing the National Anthem, just can't compete.
Fans love Fleabag, too. Reviews
at the Internet Movie Database, Rotten Tomatoes, and Amazon rhapsodize.
Quotes from a few: "Never have I seen a show that is so ruthlessly honest;"
"I emailed BBC3 to thank them for airing it;" "Non-stop laughter;"
"Not afraid of being real … raw and brave … Seeing roles like this for
women, written by women, is amazing."
I "binge watched" all twelve
episodes in two days. When I finished, I felt sick. I wanted to take a shower –
literally. I went out to dinner afterward and I said to my companion,
"Listen, I just saw something disturbing and I need to get it off my chest
before I can unwind."
Fleabag champions the lifestyle of a borderline-personality-disordered
slut. We are not supposed to be "judgmental." To mention Fleabag's
BPD symptoms is to "pathologize" her, and to assess ourselves as
"normal." Both are big no-nos. The very idea of "normal" is
demonized in contemporary ethics. "Normal" is a white, male,
oppressor word. Inge van de Ven is a media studies scholar at Tilburg
University. Van de Ven writes that to "pathologize"
Fleabag is to imply a false dichotomy, "a clear boundary between the 'pathological'
character and the supposedly 'normal' viewer."
We are also not supposed to use the word
"slut." Waller-Bridge says, "I felt really strongly while
writing Fleabag that there was no such thing as a slut, and I was just
going to erase that from the equation … Being proper and sweet and nice and
pleasing is a f---ing nightmare. It’s exhausting. As women, we get the message
about how to be a good girl."
"Slut," "normal,"
and "personality disorder" are all words that mean something, and
rendering their use a thought crime limits our ability to talk about what these
words refer to. A slut is a woman who has one-night-stands with many men whom
she doesn't like or even know. "Slut" is an unhappy and ugly word for
an unhappy and ugly lifestyle. She's not even a prostitute; she's a pathetic
amateur giving it away for reasons she doesn't understand.
Sluts don't represent feminist anything.
Sluts tend not to have a lot of female friends. That's because the slut
lifestyle is self-destructive, and self-destructive people are unpleasant to be
around. "Normal" means something close to "average" and
according to the CDC, which provides a variety of
statistics, most women have had fewer sex partners in their lifetime than
Fleabag has over the twelve episodes of the series. So, no, Fleabag is not
normal.
Waller-Bridge is a tall, slender, handsome
woman with huge eyes, a great head of hair, ivory skin and toothpaste-ad ready
teeth. She wears clothes as well as a model. She speaks with a posh British
accent. Waller-Bridge is of the "landed gentry" Waller-Bridge line. A
few of her relations, going back to the Victorian Era, have their own Wikipedia
pages.
Boy does this lucky lady know how to
whine. Every episode of Fleabag, in spite of the pervasive sex, the
attempts at humor, the shock, the cringe, is Fleabag pitying herself, begging
for your pity, and simultaneously insisting that she is above it all as the
only sane person in an insane world. Her promiscuity is an expression of her
unique sanity. So, therefore, Fleabag doesn't have to change her ways to make
her life less pitiable. The world must change to accommodate her. The world
refuses to change, so please keep up the pity along with the praise. The real
life Waller-Bridge insists that she is a feminist and that her character's
promiscuity and antisocial behavior are expressions of feminism. The character,
Fleabag, also self-describes as a feminist.
Waller-Bridge's superb teeth distract
me. I grew up poor, among other poor people. One of my friends now makes six
figures but he still suffers from the Dickensian poverty of his childhood. Both
his lungs and his teeth were permanently damaged by lack of appropriate medical
attention. One of my friends, a single mother of four – she had a husband; he
turned out to be a psycho – refers with dark humor to her infrequent trips to
the low cost "medieval dentist."
Waller-Bridge isn't satisfied being posh
and pretty. Her voracious, aggressive narcissism demands that she be the
feminist messiah who instructs the rest of us on salvation through antisocial
behavior and potty-mouthed, humiliating sluttery. A model-attractive,
"landed gentry" Brit with perfect teeth is lecturing vulnerable
female viewers, and probably not a few male voyeurs, that sluttiness is what
feminism is all about. It's what Susan B. Anthony sacrificed for and went to
jail for.
Waller-Bridge gripes that women are
taught to be "proper," taught to be a "good girl." Many of
us are "good girls," and are glad that someone taught us the facts of
life about women's relative vulnerability, and how men's sexuality differs from
ours. We aren't "good girls" because we were brainwashed by
oppressive men or oppressive religion. We are "good girls" because
that is our instinctual tendency. Modesty and sexual continence feel
comfortable and natural to us, and they are also our survival strategies; they benefit
us.
Waller-Bridge, as a very attractive
child of a "landed gentry" family, would probably never have to pay
the price for slut behavior that a poorer or minority girl from a bad family,
or simply a more sensitive girl, would have to pay. Waller-Bridge is peddling a
poison her greater socioeconomic power, and her harder heart, render her
largely immune to, but that will hurt others, specifically vulnerable women and
girls. How are women and girls hurt by personality-disordered and / or slut
behavior? Harms include jail, public humiliation and ridicule, broken hearts,
long-term trauma, eating disorders, addiction, loneliness, partner violence,
crisis pregnancy, abortion, isolation, poverty, STDs and cervical cancer.
Advocating for all that is not feminism. That's the signature cutthroat
personal ambition and greed of a drug pusher.
There's an odd feature of Fleabag that
its fans never seem to notice in their online reviews. Fleabag is as
hermetically sealed as a locked ward. Brexit, Trump, Me-Too, Climate Change,
migrants flooding into Europe, subsequent New Year's sexual assaults in
European cities, Harry and Meghan, none of the outside world is alluded to,
never mind mentioned – except of course for the scene where Fleabag masturbates
to Barack Obama. The entire world revolves around Fleabag. In twelve hours of
video, not a single character is allowed to have a significant scene apart from
Fleabag.
Fleabag, the otherwise unnamed main
character of Fleabag, is a thirty-something café owner in London. She
comes from money. Her father (Bill Paterson) is a befuddled white male
patriarch who can't finish a sentence or love his own daughter. He is under the
sexual spell of his second wife, an insincere, catty, wicked stepmother (Olivia
Colman). The stepmother, father, and several other characters have no names. This
felt like an affectation meant to communicate Fleabag's lack of recognition of
others' full humanity.
Claire (Sian Clifford) is Fleabag's
economically successful sister. Claire has a spacious corporate office. Her
success is condemned as a sellout. Claire is meant to be anally retentive and
uptight. She tells people that she "buries" and "bottles up"
her emotions. Of course people who really do bottle up their emotions don't
announce this publicly. Clifford is not a convincing actress and her
performance as tight-jawed Claire is painfully forced.
Clarie is married to Martin (Brett
Gelman), an American Jew. Martin is the most villainous character. He is loud,
threatening, needy, smarmy, and obnoxious. None of the other characters,
including his own wife and child, like him. Gelman has long, curly, black hair
and a dense, bushy black beard and mustache. As Martin, Gelman looks dark, greasy,
and unclean. Fleabag has an almost totally white, posh, English cast. In
this marshmallow world, Gelman's Martin is inescapably an antisemitic
stereotype. He's a hipster version of Shylock.
Fleabag steals, lies, drinks, smokes,
and has sex with men she doesn't like or respect. She steals the credit card of
a man she has sex with. She steals toilet paper from a home she visits. She
steals wine from a store. She steals an artist's artwork from her studio. She
steals from café customers by shortchanging them. Asked to cater her sister's
work event, she steals the canapes she serves. She steals her sister's sweater.
Her successful sister finally steals something and Fleabag praises this as the
"coolest" thing her sister has ever done. Fleabag's
"uptight" sister is honored by being tapped to present a prestigious
award. Claire leaves Fleabag alone with the award for mere minutes. Fleabag
immediately smashes the award to bits.
Fleabag initiates violent encounters
with others. She punches her brother-in-law in the nose, sparking a restaurant
brawl. She shoves her step-mother in the chest. She releases a housecat onto a
city street, thus, of course, hurting the cat owner's feelings and endangering
the pampered house pet. She invites a virtual stranger, who has just confessed
to her that he has been disciplined for repeatedly groping a coworker, to grope
her breasts. She jokes that being murdered would be okay if one could be raped first.
Fleabag's philosophy of life: "People are shit."
Fleabag owns a café. That is one of the
odder choices of Waller-Bridge the writer. Her character, Fleabag, is not the
type who would choose to feed and please others. When customers order food, Fleabag
goes to a nearby store and grabs, perhaps steals, microwave versions of the
dish the customer ordered. Fleabag's former business partner, Boo, is seen in
flashbacks. Fleabag had sex with Boo's boyfriend and Boo, brokenhearted,
committed suicide. Fleabag keeps the guinea pig she inherited from Boo in a
tiny cage with no exercise equipment.
Fleabag's café is failing. She goes to a
bank and asks for a loan. She flashes her breasts at the loan officer (Hugh
Dennis, very good here). Her tells her to leave. During a breast exam, she
attempts to flirt with the doctor, who is offended and tells her to stop.
Apparently Phoebe Waller-Bridge would have found the whole Larry Nassar sex
scandal, where a doctor used exams to molest young girls, a real laff riot.
Fleabag breaks the fourth wall. Fleabag, the
character, turns to the camera and makes running commentary on the action. The
running commentary serves the character's, and the creator's megalomania.
Though the show depicts its main character as a personality-disordered creep
who ruins other people's lives, the running commentary manipulates the audience
into interpreting Fleabag as a heroine, and everyone around her as inferior.
Fleabag, the running commentary insists,
is the only smart person in the room. The only honest person. The only one in
touch with real issues. Everyone else is a hypocrite. The family patriarch is a
fumbling aphasiac, sister Claire is a repressed, robotic neurotic, Martin is a
smarmy bottom feeder, the loan officer and the physician are spoilsports who refuse
to appreciate Fleabag's breasts, and every man Fleabag has sex with is
contemptible. Phoebe Waller-Bridge is not going to allow non-Fleabag characters
to have any good lines, to express any insight, to win any argument, to have
any moral code, any more than she allows the hapless actress Jenny Rainsford,
who plays dead best friend Boo, to look like anything other than something the
cat dragged in – see here. Claire is plain. She wears minimal
makeup and her clothes are drab. The stepmother is plump and older.
Waller-Bridge always looks perfectly turned out.
Critics use the word "cringe"
when referring to the experience of watching Fleabag. Critics insist
that the show is "honest" and "brave" and that is why
audiences cringe while watching it. Audiences are too "oppressed,"
too "good girl," too "normal" to appreciate Fleabag's
"honesty" and "insight." Flattering spin. Fleabag is
nihilistic, sadistic, and misanthropic. Its contempt for humanity made me
cringe.
While Fleabag is having sex with men,
she mocks them in her fourth-wall monologues. She attracts men with her sunny
smile, even as she turns to the audience and makes disparaging comments about
the man. She turns back to the man and, again, smiles her eager-to-please
smile. The disconnect between her inner contempt and her outer doormat
eager-to-please smile is not feminist. It is diabolical. An adult woman knows
how to say "No," to sex she does not want. Fleabag doesn't have that
capacity or discernment. Beyond that, Fleabag contributes to misogynist
stereotypes of women as vampiric teases who use men while secretly hating them.
Fleabag's boyfriend Harry (Hugh Skinner)
is depicted as having the maturity and physical presence of a nerdy high school
sophomore. He's very thin. He cries repeatedly. He cleans the apartment for
Fleabag whenever she dumps him. While they are embracing, she runs her finger
on a dusty bedside table and tells Harry she's dumping him. She is confident
that, after he cleans, he will return when she summons him. She takes him back
so she can have sex, even though she doesn't love him. While in bed with him,
she masturbates to video of Barack Obama.
At least Harry has a name. Fleabag's
other sex partners are reduced to "arsehole guy," "bus rodent,"
"hot misogynist," and "hot priest." These men are made to
say inane things that make them sound like complete idiots. "Hot
misogynist," for example, keeps repeating, "I'm really good at
sex." When Fleabag needs a man to have sex with; she walks down the
street, looking beautiful; a plump man approaches. She says that
"chubs" stands no chance with her.
Fleabag, through its promotion of sluttiness and
its contempt for the men with whom Fleabag has sex, actively encourages its
audience, not just to throw away conventional concepts of the dignity of a
woman's body, but to throw away even just conventional respect for another
human being, including human beings with whom one risks the ultimate
vulnerability of sexual intimacy. Fleabag the character humiliates her sex
partners; she reduces them to tears; she invites them to the brink of personal
ruin. And our response is supposed to be, "Oh, how honest; oh, how edgy;
oh, how feminist." That reaction relies on Fleabag the show's
refusal to see full humanity in anyone except Fleabag the character. Fleabag
sees people and depicts people the way a personality disordered person
would. People are mere possibilities for temporary personal satisfaction.
Fleabag sees a man on a bus who looks handsome. She signals sexual interest. He
smiles and shows bad teeth. She immediately reduces him to nothing but the butt
of jokes.
Again, splintered culture and the
rejection of the Judeo-Christian tradition, and its replacement with
neo-Paganism, invited us to reject the imago dei / B'tselem Elohim / image-of-God
foundation of our previous worldview. The belief that each person is made in
the image of God enriched our art. We learned to see even average people, not
just the Pharaoh or the demigod Achilles, as worthy of attention, of artistic
representation, of story. Rejecting that concept vitiates our art. Even the
worst person has some backstory, some motivation, some spark of the divine;
it's because of that spark that even villains engage our intellect. We want to
understand how something so good could go so wrong. Even the toughest, most
atheistic, God-mocking woman suffers when she does not protect her divine
essence from the cheap assaults of a slut lifestyle. In Fleabag, women
are interchangeable orifices to be filled at random, and men are nothing but
jokes it hurts to laugh at.
Flawed people living flawed lives are
the mainstay of culture. We need Cody
Jarrett shouting "Made it, Ma! Top of the world!" as he
self-immolates. Culture made that villain fascinating and unforgettable, but it
didn't flatter him. The Catholic-Church-influenced Production Code demanded
that there be others around Jarrett who were more mature, more psychologically
coherent than he, and while enchanted by Cody's charisma, we also recognized
that he was failing at basic steps in maturation. Lina Wertmuller's 1974 film Swept
Away includes graphic scenes of rape, battery, and S&M. Swept Away is
great in a way that Fleabag never approaches. Swept Away is
honest about Raffaella, a rich snob, and Gennarino, a poor Communist and macho
Italian. We see their ugly side and their best sides. Raffaella and Gennarino
are both allowed to lose contests. We laugh, we shudder, and we cry. Swept
Away's honest probing earns all those reactions.
Fleabag allows no such challenges to Fleabag's
superiority; she never loses a contest. There are aborted challenges in a
couple of scenes. The Irish actress
Fiona Shaw gives a masterful performance as a therapist who isn't taking any
guff from Fleabag. She doesn't laugh at Fleabag's jokes. She invites Fleabag to
confront her own self-sabotage. But then Fleabag asks Shaw what exactly it is
that therapists do. I've never been a therapist but I know the answer.
Therapists help make unconscious self-sabotage conscious so that clients can
change their patterns from self-sabotaging to life affirming. But Waller-Bridge
won't allow Shaw that basic reply. Powerful Fiona Shaw, who has played both
Mother Courage and Richard II onstage, is reduced to a wounded retreat. Waller-Bridge
orchestrates a narrative where her character gets the last word, and the last
word is that Fleabag is smarter than everyone around her, so her worldview of
sluttiness and personality disordered dysfunction must be correct.
The so-called "Hot Priest"
invites Fleabag to read the Bible. She says she can't respect the Bible because
God creates light before he creates the sun. The Hot Priest looks defeated.
"That's ridiculous," he is forced to concede. In fact the creation of
light before creation of the sun is one of the profound truths in the Bible.
Light was light before the sun was the sun. In any case, a quick Google search
reveals pages of exegesis exploring the question of the order of creation and
these pages are rapidly available to anyone with a search engine and humble
curiosity. Fleabag pretends that she is the first – really, really smart! –
person ever to have asked that question. And, again, as with the therapist, she
allows herself the last word. "Ridiculous." Fleabag is desperately in
need of both psychotherapy and God, but, in the script she herself wrote, she
manages to insist that she has no need of either.
Ironically, both seasons of Fleabag
include a scene where Fleabag has a nervous breakdown, and an older, white, male
authority figure rescues her. These male rescue scenes are very much not
feminist, and they are also something worse.
In season one, the loan officer enters
Fleabag's café by chance. Fleabag has a sloppy and embarrassing nervous
breakdown in front of him. She cries and confesses her slut lifestyle and uses
the F-word in every sentence, as in "I f--- everything." Most
"normal" people would, at most, offer to dial a suicide hotline. But
in an unlikely plot twist, the loan officer who had turned her down after she
flashed her breasts, suddenly offers her a loan. In season two, Fleabag has a
nervous breakdown and blurts out her inner turmoil to a priest, who grabs her
and kisses her, making her feel, temporarily, better.
Waller-Bridge thus rewards Fleabag for
behaving in a mentally disordered way. This is the kind of manipulative fantasy
mental disorders engender in affected people. "If I go really nuts in
public, someone powerful will rescue me from myself." The disordered behavior
is seen as a life saver, and a personal asset, rather than as personal deficit,
a dead weight dragging the sufferer down. Fleabag needs to overcome her
histrionic manipulations. Instead, she indulges them, is rewarded, and fends
off any maturation.
Waller-Bridge the writer is manipulating
the viewer just as her character, Fleabag, is manipulating the loan officer and
Hot Priest. Waller-Bridge has depicted a repellant character. She tries to
manipulate us into liking this character because we see her cry and whine. She
tries to convince us that this manipulative, histrionic display is a true
"breakthrough." From now on, we are to believe, Fleabag will be a
better person. Her emotionality has brought her to full health. I might be
convinced of a new, improved Fleabag if she went back to Fiona Shaw and
committed to therapy, an end to theft, and sexual continence.
What, then, is "feminist"
about Fleabag? Fleabag meets Belinda, a business colleague of her
sister's, for a drink. Belinda delivers a boilerplate, pseudo-feminist rant.
She's angry she received a prize as a "businesswoman." Such prizes
put her in a ghetto; they are the kiddy table. Women carry pain inside, Belinda
says. Menstruation is very painful, as is menopause. Men have to go in search
of pain. That's why they invent gods, demons, and wars. So they can feel
something and touch each other. When there are no wars, men play rugby. Menopause
means "You are no longer a slave."
I was rolling my eyes throughout
Belinda's self-dramatizing ladies room rant, and I am here to attest that I
have had the most painful periods of any woman on the planet. But come on. One
of my male friends has scars all over his body from iron work. I have to guess
that some of the income-generating, wife-and-kids-supporting work behind those
scars hurt as much as my monthly visitor. I'll never know because he never
talks about it.
Belinda is not allowed to exit the plot
till she praises Fleabag. "You're a tonic," she tells Fleabag. When
Fleabag tells Belinda that she stole artwork from an artist's studio, Belinda
says, "Glorious. You did exactly the right thing." When Fleabag says
that she stole the canapes she served at Claire's event, Belinda laughs
approvingly. Theft, to Fleabag and its audience, is a feminist value. Fleabag's
hapless father, who is incapable of completing a sentence, is also roped into
the all-praise-Fleabag requirement. He finally completes a sentence to Fleabag,
saying, "You know how to love better than any of us." Um, no, she
does not.
And what about Fleabag's depiction
of Catholicism? What about the "Hot Priest" character? Here's what.
There is no Catholicism in Fleabag, and there's no "Hot
Priest," any more than there is any feminism. The entire show is an
exercise in narcissism. The show's characters are Fleabag and not-Fleabag, that
is they are foils for her, there for her to triumph over and humiliate, or to
profit from. The Hot Priest is not only not a well-rounded character, he's not
a character at all.
Hot Priest – he has no other name – is
Fleabag in a collar. Like her, he is a lost soul; he is sexually incontinent
and erotically manipulative; he doesn't get along with his parents – they are
drunks – or his brother – he's a pedophile; he drinks and smokes too much; and
he feels alien from but superior to others, around whom he acts a part. He
blurts out TMI – too much information. He uses the F-word to excess; at one
point he actually says "I f---ing love Winnie the Pooh. F---." At a
Christian prayer meeting, Fleabag blurts out, "I sometimes worry that I
wouldn't be a feminist if I had bigger tits," and Hot Priest laughs
approvingly. Susan B. Anthony must wonder if it isn't time to come back and
smack some heads, starting with Phoebe Waller-Bridge's well-coiffed noggin.
Again, Fleabag is a mostly
marshmallow white world, but Hot Priest and Fleabag share a laugh over the
funny, fat black lady with the funny accent, Pam, who is onscreen only long
enough to mispronounce words in a way meant to be comical.
That a show celebrating sluttiness made
such capital out of a sex-with-a-priest plot speaks volumes. Even those
celebrating and emulating Fleabag's slut behavior yearn for the very boundaries
that they badmouth as "oppressive" and "misogynist." Those
embracing the Hot Priest plot want a world where there are rules against casual
sex. Since he is a priest, Fleabag and Hot Priest don't immediately have sex.
They have a couple of conversations first. Hot Priest pays attention to
Fleabag. Her other partners, like her, are in it only for the temporary scratch
of a temporary itch. The other person's humanity is an impediment to cheap sex.
All of Fleabag's many problems, her
compulsive thefts, her contempt for the men she is sexually addicted to, her
constant blow-ups with her family, would be solved by the very qualities she
mocks. Maturity, confrontation with the self, discipline of personal desires,
compassion for one's fellow humans, commitment to a significant other and
compromise with that other to build a rewarding life and experience, yes, true
better sex through true intimacy, would solve Fleabag's agonies and those of
her many fans who insist, "I am Fleabag!"
There are fan fictions based on Fleabag.
I've read a few. In the ones I read, Fleabag is in a monogamous, tender,
mutually committed and supportive relationship with Hot Priest. They can enjoy
each other even while just holding hands and watching sappy romantic movies on
TV.
Does this pop culture product matter?
Ask Psychology Today. According to an April 14, 2023 article, women on social
media are self-identifying as Fleabag. They exercise her "slick apathy and
unapologetic amorality." "Emulating her journey or looking upon her
as a role model is not a recommended path to mental health and happiness."
Dr. Mark Travers comically understates his red flag warning. Women who identify
with Fleabag must stop relationship self-sabotage. "This has to be
developed by working on building trust, improving communication, making
commitments, and creating an atmosphere of safety, preferably under the
guidance of a licensed mental health practitioner … Leaning into a
fictionalized character’s destructive qualities might be taking it a bit too
far … the character you love is fictitious, and so are the consequences of her
actions—unlike yours," Dr. Travers concludes.
Phoebe Waller-Bridge knows all this. She
doesn't care. Depicting a normal woman struggling to lead a decent life would
not win her the acclaim that Fleabag has.
Danusha Goska is the author of God Through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery
No comments:
Post a Comment