Robert Spencer invites the reader to a fascinating, forgotten world
Empire of
God was published by
Bombardier Books in November, 2023. The book is 400 pages and includes
twenty-one pages of black-and-white illustrations. There are extensive
footnotes but unfortunately no index.
Spencer is
fully deserving of a Presidential Medal of Freedom. Those who tell the truth
about Islam risk their lives. Witness the fates of Theo Van Gogh, Salman
Rushdie, Samuel Paty, Molly Norris, Hitoshi Igarashi, and a former teacher at Batley Grammar School. We
are not allowed to know this teacher's name. Muslims forced him to run for his
life and disappear. His erasure, we shall learn, has happened not just to
individuals, but to entire civilizations.
Even Pope
Benedict XVI felt it necessary to back-pedal after, in a university lecture,
merely quoting Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos. In 1391 this emperor
observed, "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you
will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the
sword the faith he preached." After the papal lecture, Muslims attacked
churches in Israel, Gaza, and Iraq. In Somalia, Muslims murdered Sister
Leonella Sgorbati, who worked at a children's hospital. In Iraq, they beheaded
Father Ameer Iskander, a priest.
In spite of
Islam's suppression of free speech, free inquiry, and the human conscience,
Spencer goes where others dare not go. If I were queen, I would offer a tax
benefit to any citizen who mastered three essential Spencer books: The Critical Qur'an, The History of Jihad, and Did Muhammad Exist? I'm not
queen, but everyone – Muslims most of all – should read these books.
Nowadays,
unsupported claims of "genocide" are tossed around as propaganda
tools and exchange goods. Empire of God, draws attention to an actual
biological and cultural genocide: the religiously-mandated Islamic erasure of
the Byzantine Empire, its faith, its language, its awe-inspiring monuments, and
its people.
Spencer was baptized as a Melkite Greek Catholic. "Melkite Greek Catholics," he explains, "are an Eastern church very similar to the orthodox churches but in communion with Rome … my family is from what is now Turkey … My grandparents shortly after World War I were offered the choice of conversion to Islam or exile from the land where they had lived for many hundreds of years … they came to the United States … Their experiences involved some violence and some killings of some of the family members … [But] they spoke in a uniformly positive fashion about life over there and made me become quite fascinated with it such that I took the first opportunity I could when I went to college to read the Koran and to begin studying Islamic theology and history."
Spencer's
grandparents may have been remnants of the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine
Empire is more influential and yet less known than the mythical lost Atlantis.
The Empire lasted for a thousand years. It was the "Eastern Roman
Empire" after the fall of Rome. Its inhabitants considered themselves
Romans and their descendants called themselves and their language Roman. Its
crowning jewel, the Hagia Sophia, was completed in 537 AD and it still stands
today, though Muslims desecrated it and it is now used as a mosque.
Astoundingly,
the Byzantines erected Hagia Sophia in just five years. When it was completed,
it was the world's largest interior space. Its massive dome harnessed Greek
ingenuity to defy gravity. After 1453, "It was extremely difficult for non-Muslims to
visit the mosque of Aya Sofya. Sixteenth and seventeenth-century European
travelers tell tales of bribery and disguise to gain entrance at risk of life
and limb."
Constantinople
was one of the richest and most luxurious cities in the world. The emperor's
throne room included a "tree of gilt bronze, whose branches … were filled
with birds of different sizes, which emitted the songs of the different birds
corresponding to their species … lions of immense size … coated with gold …
seemed to guard" the emperor. These mechanical lions struck the ground
with their tails and "emitted a roar with mouths open and tongues
flickering." The throne rose in a way that seemed miraculous to observers,
and the emperor's clothing changed as his throne rose. The Byzantines deployed
a weapon called "Greek fire." The recipe of Greek fire has been lost
to time. This weapon immolated enemy ships.
The Muslim
Conquest slowly but surely crushed the Byzantine Empire. The centuries-old
Christian world of North Africa and the Middle East died the death of a deer
strangled and swallowed by a python. It takes a long time for the serpent to
digest one of God's loveliest creatures, but once the process starts, there is
no escape.
St. Augustine
was born in what is now Algeria. St. Anthony, founder of Christian monasticism,
was Egyptian. The Shroud of Turin, historians theorize, was once stored in what
is now Turkey. Christians are now unsafe in all of these locations. Up to the
Middle Ages, Egypt, once part of the Byzantine Empire, was majority Christian.
Christians were menaced, humiliated, taxed, punished, and pressured to convert.
Egypt is today perhaps ten percent Christian.
Year by year,
remnant populations of Christians disappear. In 1900, Turkey was twenty percent Christian. By
1927, Turkey was 2.5% Christian. Today, Christians are less than 0.2% of the
Turkish population. Earlier in the twentieth century, Bethlehem was 85%
Christian; it's now about 12%. "In Bethlehem, the Christian population is
shrinking and afraid," reported the London Times on December 23,
2022. "Christians everywhere should protest persecution in Middle East,
Asia, Africa," reported the Jerusalem Post on December 21, 2023. "The
Palestinian Authority has always shown contempt for Christian holy sites,
violently evicting monks and nuns from the Holy Trinity Monastery in Hebron in
1997, and using Christian churches, schools, and homes as military bases … In
April 2002, PA forces took over the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem and
held 40 Christian clergy and nuns as hostages for 39 days." Listen closely
and you can hear the sound of bricks crashing and women mourning. Those sounds
have been ongoing for 1,400 years. Byzantium continues to fall.
My fellow
Catholics, in the 1204 Sack of Constantinople, contributed to the Byzantine
Empire's vulnerability to jihad. In an atrocity of historic proportions,
Catholic Crusaders desecrated churches, stole relics, and carried off precious
metals and jewels. They murdered innocents and burned structures. Catholic
Crusaders struck a blow to the Byzantine Empire from which it never recovered.
The Pope at the
time recognized that the Crusaders had committed a great sin. Pope Innocent III
excommunicated the guilty. He also wrote to the Crusade's commander, "You
rashly violated the purity of your vows; and turning your arms not against the Saracens
but against Christians, you applied yourself not to the recovery of Jerusalem,
but to seize Constantinople, preferring earthly to heavenly riches … These
‘soldiers of Christ’ who should have turned their swords against the infidel
have steeped them in Christian blood, sparing neither religion, nor age, nor
sex … They stripped the altars of silver, violated the sanctuaries, robbed
icons and crosses and relics … the Latins have given example only of perversity
and works of darkness, No wonder the Greeks call them dogs!"
Eight centuries
later, Pope John Paul II, On May 4, 2001, apologized, even as Orthodox monks, nuns,
and priests marched with signs reading "Pope go home."
"Some memories are especially painful, and some events of the distant past
have left deep wounds in the minds and hearts of people to this day … The
disastrous sack of the imperial city of Constantinople" is one such
painful memory. Constantinople "was for so long the bastion of
Christianity in the East. It is tragic that the assailants, who had set out to
secure free access for Christians to the Holy Land, turned against their own
brothers in the faith. The fact that they were Latin Christians fills Catholics
with deep regret … We entrust the heavy burden of the past to his endless
mercy, imploring him to heal the wounds which still cause suffering to the
spirit of the Greek people. Together we must work for this healing if the Europe
now emerging is to be true to its identity, which is inseparable from the
Christian humanism shared by East and West."
The sins of the
past are grave; the urgent task of the present is to preserve the best of our
shared Christian heritage. Jihad has been joined by Marxism and New Atheism. We
don't have a moment to waste.
Empire of
God's narrative focuses
on the succession of Byzantine rulers from antiquity to the end in 1453 when
the Ottoman Turks entered Constantinople and ended the Empire. Byzantine
emperors were sometimes dynamic, expansionist, wise, self-sacrificing, and
served their people well. They erected magnificent public structures, reclaimed
territory lost to an endless line of enemies, clarified massive legal codes,
and attended to smooth successions after their deaths. They kept the value of
money stable and they took a prudent approach to taxation. They formed valuable
alliances and agreed to strategic truces.
As Spencer
points out, war was a constant fact of life in the Byzantine Empire. The
Byzantines fought an astonishing series of enemies, including Vandals, Goths,
Bulgars, Lombards, Pagan Russians and other Pagan Slavs, Scythians, and
Normans. A good emperor was one who won wars and kept the peace.
Bad emperors
over-taxed their citizens, engaged in military follies that lost territory,
tinkered with the value of currency to disastrous effect, and agreed to truces
that hurt, not helped, them in the long term. Bad emperors were obsessed not
with affairs of state but with the many entertainments available in the Empire,
including the theater and races in the Hippodrome. That Hippodrome was
something, by the way. It could accommodate 100,000 spectators. Eight chariots,
each pulled by four horses, could race at once. Royalty and commoners watched
the same spectacles.
Bad emperors,
rather than handle succession peacefully, sometimes murdered their fathers,
other kin, or rivals. Poison, both slow-and-quick acting, decapitation, and
torture were all possible murder methods. Sometimes a rival would simply be
blinded and imprisoned. Some emperors were unable to produce a male heir.
Apparently
there were many highly literate chroniclers devoted to recording Byzantine
history. They churned out many humanizing and horrifying anecdotes. Spencer
spices up his text with juicy, colorful quotes. These voices from the past
sound utterly vibrant and alive.
One can't know
if the chroniclers' tales are true or are the Byzantine version of an internet
rumor, but their tales are fascinating. That they aren't always reliable is
demonstrated by one chronicler's reporting that Justinian I was a vampire and
seen walking with his head separated from his body. Another emperor rises from
the dead to join in the fight against Bulgars. Other anecdotes are easier to
believe. Some emperors were illiterate and signed legislation using a stencil
that squeezed out the legitimizing word "Legi," or "I
have read."
Spencer's
parade of emperor after emperor is punctuated by key events. The first such
event: In 312 AD, Roman Emperor Constantine had a vision of a cross and the
caption, "In hoc signo vinces," or "In this sign you will
conquer." Constantine may or may not have converted to Christianity, but
his reforms fostered Christianity's dominance. Spencer points out,
"Constantine did not make Christianity the official religion of the
empire." Constantine assured non-Christians that they would not be coerced
into conversion. Constantine founded Constantinople as a Christian city
untainted by Paganism. "That Salonica could have become a center of Jewish
learning … in the twelfth century demonstrates that, however imperfectly at
times, the Roman Empire in the Byzantine era was a truly tolerant
society," Spencer writes.
Justinian I,
who reigned between 527 and 565 AD, was able to retake territory from Barbarian
invaders. Justinian also revised Roman law and oversaw the production of the Corpus
Juris Civilis, or Body of Civil Law, which would someday be studied by John
Adams and Thomas Jefferson. Another important event in Byzantine history was
the Plague of Justinian (541 - 549 AD). This plague may have killed forty
percent of the capital city's population and twenty-five percent of the overall
population in the eastern Mediterranean. The Byzantine – Sassanian War of 602 –
628 was the last and most destructive of the wars between the Christian
Byzantine Empire and the Zoroastrian Persian Empire. Shortly after the
devastation of the plague followed by war, The Muslim Conquests began in
622.
Christians in
the West were more Latinized and more closely connected to traditions in Rome.
Christians in the Byzantine Empire spoke Greek and considered Constantinople
the center of Christendom. Church leaders clashed over issues that seem trivial
to us today, including something called the filioque. The filioque is Latin for
"and from the son." It refers to words added to the Nicene creed.
These words identified the Holy Spirit as proceeding not just "from the
father," but "from the father and the son." western Christians
adopted the new wording; eastern Christians preferred the original wording. For
the Eucharist, western Christians preferred unleavened bread, while eastern
Christians preferred leavened bread.
Other clashes
were over worldly power and ultimate survival. Eastern Christian leaders
considered themselves equal or superior to western Christians. Eventually the
bishop of Rome demanded the subservience of other bishops. Bishops in the east
at first objected but finally relented in a doomed attempt to gain western
military support in their existential struggle against jihad. The Great Schism
of 1054 was one event in a series of clashes. Spencer points out that at the
time, most Christians didn't regard this alleged schism as a big deal. Many
weren't even aware that it happened. But 1054 was evidence of a pre-existing
crack between two cultures, a crack that would grow wider as time went on. It
is, today, a gulf, and it is not healed.
In 717 AD,
Emperor Leo III, after the plague and the onset of the Muslim Conquest,
recognized that the Empire was on the ropes. He searched for a cause and a
solution. He decided that the church's emphasis on imagery was to blame. The
second commandment, he decided, forbade imagery. Iconoclasm, or the destruction
of images, would, Leo reasoned, restore God's favor, and worldly wealth and
military victory. Clerics objected and stated that Leo was overstepping his
authority as a worldly, not church, leader, but Leo prevailed. For a while
iconoclasm seemed to work, and Byzantines won victories. Then they lost, and
people realized there was no cause and effect. In any case iconoclasm was
eventually overturned as policy.
Regent Irene,
ruling in place of her nine-year-old son, was in favor of icons. In 787 she
convened a council of church leaders who also supported icons. Ten years later,
Irene had her son, who had come of age, arrested, blinded, and imprisoned, so
that she could retain power. A chronicler reports that the sun stopped shining
because the emperor had been blinded. Irene was in turn eventually deposed and
exiled.
In 1071,
Byzantine forces were defeated by the Seljuk Empire. This defeat took place at
Manzikert, in what is now eastern Turkey. Emperor Romanos IV Diogenes was
captured. This was the first time a Roman emperor was captured since Persians
captured Valerian in 260 AD. This defeat was yet another disastrous watershed
that weakened the Empire and aided the Muslim advance.
On November 27,
1095, Pope Urban II heeded calls from the Empire for help against jihad.
"Your brethren who live in the east are in urgent need of your help … the
Turks and Arabs have attacked them … they have destroyed the churches … I
beseech you … to carry aid promptly to these Christians and to destroy that
vile race from the lands of our friends." "Deus vult!,"
he said. Alas, the Crusades did not work out as Urban, or the Empire, had
hoped.
Empress
Theodora is my favorite person in Spencer's book. She was an activist against
human trafficking and prostitution. Another Empress Theodora, who ruled in the
middle of the ninth century, is also awesome. A Bulgar, Bogoris, threatened
Theodora and insulted her sex. Her response rings down the centuries. "You
will have to reckon with me fighting against you, and, if it be God's will,
getting the better of you. And even if it is you who gets the upper hand (which
is by no means impossible) the victory will still be mine. For it will be a
woman, not a man that you have overcome." Her fire "took the wind out
of the barbarian's sails; he fell silent and renewed the former treaties,"
reports the chronicler.
In 988 AD, Anna
Porphyrogenita was forced to marry Vladimir I of Kiev, a Pagan who chose
Christianity for himself and his people. Anna resisted this marriage but she
made the best of it, playing an active role in the Christianization of Kievan
Rus. Czarina Anna even inspired a rock
opera.
Anna Komnene
was another impressive Byzantine woman. A princess, she was also an historian.
Around 1148, she wrote the Alexiad, an important account, inter alia, of
the early Crusades. The Alexiad, says Spencer, is "a triumph of
medieval historiography." Amazon reviewers describe the Alexiad:
"marvelous and contagious," "cinematic," "reads like a
novel," "you're totally immersed in Anna's world," a
"witty, entertaining, informative" account of "every political
intrigue and subtle nuance of living in Queen of Cities."
The Byzantine
Empire was not perfect. Slavery and castration of slaves were practiced, as
were mutilation and dismemberment. Spencer does not linger on the many
blindings he mentions. Journalist Rafil
Kroll-Zaidi provides a gory description.
"The
rulers of Byzantium were accustomed to blinding their rivals. With ornamental
eye scoops, with daggers, with candelabras, kitchen knives, and tent pegs, with
burning coals and boiling vinegar, with red-hot bowls held near the face and
with bandages that left the eyes unharmed but were forbidden to be removed;
sometimes it was sufficient merely to singe the eyelashes, for the victim to
bellow and sigh like a lion as a trained executioner pantomimed the act ... The
iconoclasts blinded the eyes of the icons."
Spencer writes
that in 528 Justinian I oversaw the torture, public humiliation, and the
amputation of the genitals of homosexuals. One visitor to the Byzantine emperor
presented him with castrated child slaves. One emperor, Michael III, who
dispatched Saints Cyril and Methodius to the Slavs, thus beginning the Cyrillic
alphabet, would, allegedly, get drunk and order that random victims have their
nose or ear or head cut off. One would hope that had the Byzantine Empire
continued, it would have eventually realized, as abolitionists later did, that
these practices violated their faith. See, for example, Catechism of the
Catholic Church, 2297, here.
Spencer argues
that "the Byzantines saved Western civilization from destruction and
oblivion and did so in numerous ways. Without the Byzantine Empire, there would
be no Western civilization." Western civ descends from Athens. It could
not have, Spencer says, unless the Byzantines had preserved "the
pioneering philosophical and literary works of ancient Greece. When only a
handful of the works of Plato, Aristotle, and others were known in the West,
the fifteenth-century Byzantine philosopher Gemistos Plethon brought works of
theirs that were preserved only in the empire to Florence and taught classes on
them, doing a great deal to spark the Renaissance and the Enlightenment."
When
Christianity was riven by controversy over the exact nature of Christ, church
fathers, initially convened by Constantine, met to debate their differences.
These debates, Spencer writes, "set an important precedent for precision
of thought, as opposed to slackness or indeterminateness … the council fathers
paved the way for the precision of scientific exploration that would become a
hallmark of the West … there is a straight line from Nicaea to Galileo, and to
Neil Armstrong."
Spencer
describes a highly educated Empire. Dutch historian Peter Rietbergen concurs.
He writes, "Byzantine society was an
educated one. Primary education, widely available, sometimes even at the
village level … for both sexes – a thing unheard of in the Christian west till
some thousand years later – ensured a high level of literacy. Female participation
in culture, generally, was extensive, with many aristocratic ladies studying,
engaging in research and writing. Scholarship was held in high esteem, fostered
both in the great university of Constantinople, founded already in AD 425"
and elsewhere in the Empire.
Byzantine
emperors, like Justinian, didn't just revise legal codes. They agreed that the
emperor was subject to the law "eight hundred years before the Magna
Carta," writes Spencer. While this concept was not always respected,
"even to state it as a principle or ideal was a sharp departure from the
other empires of the day."
Given Spencer's
focus on emperors and warfare, there's not a lot of social history in Empire
of God. Social history is "history from below;" it paints a
portrait of every day life for common people, the kind of people who don't make
it into genealogies of kings.
Spencer does
include a brief, unflattering report from French historian Odo of Deuil, who wrote of his 1147 visit
to Constantinople. "The exterior of the palace is of almost incomparable
loveliness." But "the city is rather squalid and smelly and many
places are afflicted with perpetual darkness. The rich build their houses so as
to overhang the streets and leave these dark and dirty places for travellers
and for the poor. There murder and robberies occur, as well as other sordid
crimes which love the dark. Life in this city is lawless, since it has as many
lords as it has rich men and almost as many thieves as poor men. Here the
criminal feels neither fear nor shame, since crime is not punished by law nor
does it ever fully come to light. Constantinople exceeds the average in
everything. It surpasses other cities in wealth and also in vice."
I enjoyed this
book and I recommend it to you. There were just a couple of features of the
book that did not work for me. In several places, Spencer interrupts the flow
of his historical narrative and jerks his reader out of immersion in the
ancient past to insert commentary on how events in the Empire parallel events
in America today. For example, he mentions the Biden administration's hiring of
cross-dresser, bestiality practitioner, and thief Sam Brinton. I can draw my
own conclusions about parallels. In any case, they were few enough in number
and brief enough that they didn't ruin the book for me.
A minor
disagreement. Spencer opens his book with a defense against stereotypes of the
Byzantines. Spencer quotes an historian who says that the Crusaders from the
West assessed the Byzantines as "gay Greeks – effeminate, scheming, and
bitchy." Another says, "the modern stereotype of Byzantium is
tyrannical government by effeminate, cowardly men and corrupt eunuchs, obsessed
with hollow rituals and endless, complex and incomprehensible
bureaucracy." Spencer is on a mission to rescue the Empire not just from
obscurity, but from the contempt of those who know a little, but not enough,
about it.
Spencer is
correct. "Byzantinism," or prejudice against the Byzantine Empire,
has its own Wikipedia page. Harvard Professor Dimiter
Angelov published, in 2003, "Byzantinism: The Imaginary and Real Heritage
of Byzantium in Southeastern Europe." In this scholarly article, Angelov
demonstrates that Westerners sometimes view the Empire's former territories in
Europe, [and in fact all of Eastern Europe], as "crippled,"
"different," and "backward."
Why? One
reason: The West failed Byzantium when the Crusaders sacked Constantinople. The
West failed again when Constantinople fell to jihad. The West's failures
continue today. We comfortable Western Christians barely react to persecution
of Christians in the lands of the former Byzantine Empire. As Hitler himself
said, "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the
Armenians?"
Denigrating
those we have failed lessens the sting of our own failure. Something similar
happened after the West failed Eastern Europe at Yalta, at Budapest in 1956,
and at Prague in 1968. We responded to our own failure by telling the Dumb
Polak and "Wild and Crazy" Czech jokes so popular in the 1970s.
Another reason
for Byzantinism. Atheists and their allies are repelled by the Empire's
religiosity and spirituality. Joseph Connors is Harvard Professor of the History
of Art and Architecture of the Renaissance and Baroque. Connors points out that "Byzantium was reviled
in the Enlightenment as a civilization ridden with superstition. The French
historian Hippolyte Taine wrote in 1865 of the mosaics of Ravenna … [that they]
looked like 'vacant flattened sickly idiots…great simpletons with staring eyes
and hollow cheeks.'"
Byzantine art
and architecture was not the only target of Enlightenment critics.
Enlightenment figures also disparaged the architecture of their own ancestors,
Western European Catholics. Moliere condemned "the dismal taste for Gothic
monuments, hateful monstrosities vomited up in torrents by barbarians
throughout the centuries of ignorance."
Both Gothic and
Byzantine art emphasized the spirit over accurate representation of anatomy and
physiology. The mosaics of Ravenna are exquisite. They don't look like real
people; they capture the essence of the soul, not the muscles or bodily organs.
When I gaze at Empress Theodora and Emperor Justinian as depicted in Ravenna's
mosaics, I feel as if I could, just through my thought and my feelings,
transcend time and space and communicate with them. I thank Theodora for her
work against sexual slavery. I try to convince Justinian that he needs to
rethink his approach to his homosexual subjects.
I love the more
anatomically accurate approach of Greek Classical art and also Renaissance art,
but I don't have that transcendent reaction to that more carnal art. Meaty art
is clearly a depiction of a mortal human, limited by time and space, someone dead
and gone. Spiritual art exists on a plane that any one of us can participate
in.
Romanian
theology Professor Nicu Dumitrascu explains,
"The icon portrays the human as united with God. The icon unites two
worlds, which appear to be irreconcilable, but in fact are in perfect
co-ordination in the transfiguration of the whole creation. It allows us to
unite the past with the present, and to catch a glimpse of the future. The icon
is an expression of eternity because the Face of the Unseen becomes transparent
in it."
Part of
Spencer's jousting against Byzantinism and his rescue of the Empire's gifts to
us today is Spencer's rejection of the words "Byzantine" and
"Byzantium." He prefers "Rome" and "Roman." In
this review, I do not reflect this choice. Not enough people have even heard of
the Byzantine Empire to be aware of the negative stereotyping. People,
including me, inevitably associate the words "Rome" and
"Roman" with the Coliseum, Russell Crowe as the Gladiator, Nero,
crucifixion, etc.
Some in the
West have denigrated the Empire. But not every Westerner has done so. Spencer
never mentions Nobel-prize winner William Butler Yeats' 1926 poem "Sailing
to Byzantium." One of the world's premier poets valued Byzantium so highly
that he used it as a metaphor for the rarefied spiritual, intellectual, and
aesthetic side of life that makes old age endurable. In his poem, Yeats clings
to the "artifice of eternity" to be found in Byzantium. Byzantine
artistry and spirituality is necessary for Yeats, an old man, "a tattered
coat upon a stick." "Unless soul clap hands and sing" and
appreciate the "monuments of unageing intellect" to be found in
Byzantium, brute survival in a merely carnal world is too grim for this elderly
poet to consider.
Yeats' poem was
no one-off; it was part of a Byzantine revival, 1850-1950, that included
an American church by Frank Lloyd Wright and the Parisian crypt of Louis
Pasteur. Gustav Klimt made a pilgrimage to the previously mentioned Byzantine
mosaics in Ravenna. Klimt praised these "mosaics of unbelievable splendor"
as a "revelation." The mosaics inspired his "Lady in Gold."
Mad King Ludwig's castle in Neuschwanstein, Germany, contains a
Byzantine-inspired Throne Hall. Stockholm's City Hall contains
a Golden Hall in Byzantine style. The Basilica of the National Shrine of the
Immaculate Conception in Washington, DC, is the largest Roman Catholic church
in North America and one of the largest in the world. It is built in
Byzantine-Romanesque style.
Early in the
twentieth-century, French historian Charles Diehl wrote, "Under the golden domes of
Justinian's church, every Byzantine experienced emotions [that transcend human
intelligence] … as deep and as powerful and his mystic and pious soul became
marvellously exalted." Clearly, there is appreciation as well as negative
stereotyping.
Even National Public Radio has celebrated the
Empire. In 2020, NPR featured an attempt by two Stanford scholars, one an
historian, the other an expert in music and computers, to recreate Hagia
Sophia's unearthly acoustics. Bissera Pentcheva and Jonathan Abel used recent
innovations to bring back, not the Empire, but a precious piece of its sound
world. Capella Romana, a vocal group, recorded songs that would have been sung
by celebrants in the cathedral six centuries ago. Pentcheva and Abel's work
manipulated Capella Romana's singing to recreate it as it would have sounded in
Hagia Sophia.
Even the
leftists at NPR got goosebumps. NPR reports, "Imagine. It's the early 13th
century. You're sitting inside the Hagia Sophia. Marble pillars rise up around
you. And dusty light filters into the windows in the massive dome above … It's
actually something that is beyond humanity that the sound is trying to
communicate."
YouTube
listeners got goosebumps, too. From the comments: "Imagine
being there when the Hagia Sophia was a Christian church with the scent of
incense, the smoke, the sunlight, the shadows, and the liturgy in all its
glory. And I'm not even Greek or Orthodox." "Even a Lutheran like me,
feels this Great Byzantine chant touch me. Praise the Lord!" And,
"Oh... As an Orthodox, I thank you. This church is our wound, and our
cure. Our pain and our pride. Our piece of Heaven here on Earth."
Turning from
the spiritual to the carnal, I wondered, what happened to most of the human
beings living in the Byzantine Empire as jihad made its way west?
I tried the
same internet search on three different browsers. I began to type, "What
do Turkish people…" and the browser finished the search for me: "look
like?" People keep asking, "Why do Turks not look like the Central
Asian peoples to which they are supposed to be related?" Why did Ataturk,
the "Father of the Turks," have blue eyes and blond hair? Why does
one of Turkey's most popular actors, Kivanc Tatlitug, have blue eyes and
(possibly dyed) blond hair? Tatlitug is 6'2" tall. He could play Thor. If
he auditioned to play a Central Asian character, he'd be accused of racism.
Ahval
is a Turkey-focused news site. In 2019, it claimed that home DNA test kits are
banned in Turkey. "DNA-based tests shake Turks' beliefs in their
'Turkishness'" Ahval claims, in the 2019 article.
"Instead of being direct descendants of the Seljuk and Ottoman hordes who
surged into Anatolia from Central Asia a millennium ago," the article goes
on, Turks who live outside of Turkey and who can access home DNA test kits are
discovering, to their consternation, that they have Greek, Armenian, Italian, Slavic,
Jewish, and Kurdish ancestry. In the cases of the first four ancestries, that
means their ancestors were probably not Muslims at all, but were probably
Christian.
One user
reports, "Her family, from the northeastern province of Bayburt, had
refused to believe that they had had Armenian, Italian and Greek links."
Bayburt used to have a large Armenian population. "Many young Armenian
women were taken by local Turks and Kurds, or handed over by their families in
order to save their lives ... they then changed their religion and hid their
roots," the article reports. The woman who took the test was surprised.
"Before this test, we believed that Bayburt had only Turks." Turkey
aggressively suppresses knowledge of the Armenian Genocide. Mere mention of it
is a crime that can result in prosecution, as happened to Orhan Pamuk, a
Nobel-Prize-winning novelist. Descendants of Armenians, now living as Turks,
apparently do not even know that Armenians lived in Bayburt just over a hundred
years ago.
One test user
was put in touch with a cousin in Italy who shares her DNA profile. "He
told the story of our Italian ancestors from the 1600s. According to him, some
100 people were brought to the Ottoman territories as slaves and so one of
those 100 people was our ancestor." This user discovered that her husband
is of Jewish, Cohanim ancestry.
Fethiye Cetin
is a Turkish lawyer. She assumed herself to be a descendant of pure Turkish,
Muslim ancestry. Her grandmother revealed to Cetin that the name by which Cetin
knew her was not her name at all. She was an Armenian, a Christian, and a
survivor of a death march into the desert. Her fellow villagers were murdered
by Turks. Cetin tells this story of forced Islamization in My Grandmother: A Memoir. Her follow-up book is The Grandchildren: The
Hidden Legacy of 'Lost' Armenians in Turkey.
On September
22, 2023, Paul Antonopoulos posted a video on Twitter. The video
purports to reveal the feelings of one Turk who did a DNA test and discovered
himself to be of Greek ancestry. The man says, "The Ottomans enslaved
European Christians for 600 years to their harems and Janissary army … nobody makes movies about it. Nobody talks
about it … We come from Christians who were kidnapped and used as slaves by
these Ottomans. By making us all Turks, by calling us all the same, by saying
'How happy is he who says calls himself Turk', Ataturk turned to the dark side
… Instead of telling us we were kidnapped Christians who were then turned into
Muslim Turks, he kept this most important part of our history a secret … We
come from Christians." Turks "committed genocide against Christian
Armenians and Christian Greeks so [Ataturk] can establish a country without any
Christians in them."
These are
anecdotes. What about numbers? A 2016 scholarly article found that "Turkey’s paternal ancestry
was 38 percent European, 35 percent Middle Eastern, 18 percent South Asian and
9 percent Central Asian."
Given canonical
Islamic dictates, dictates that Spencer documents in his book, the story of
Cetin's grandmother has been repeated millions of times. Little Heranus is a
Christian, Armenian child. Invaders arrive. They murder all the men and drive
the women and children to their deaths in the desert. A man in uniform wrenches
Heranus from her dying mother's arms. He tells her that her name is Seher and
she is a Muslim Turk. The end.
I would love to
sit across the table from Turks and ask them, "Do you ever think of your
ancestors? Do you ever ponder what inspired them to take on the nationality,
'Turk,' and the Islamic religion? Do you know how the Turkish population,
originally from Central Asia, came to include fair hair, blue eyes, and great
height?"
"Do you
know about devshirme, the monstrously vile 'blood tax'? Slavic and other
Christian children were stolen from their parents, forced to convert to Islam,
and become slaves to Muslims. One Serbian victim wrote, 'We always thought about killing the
Turks and running away by ourselves among the mountains, but our youth did not
permit us to do that.' He escaped. 'The whole region pursued us, and having
caught and bound us, they beat us and tortured us and dragged us behind horses.'
Serbs are tall
and were appreciated for that, according to an amateur historian who reports,
'I’ve heard Turks' in internet discussions 'still remarking on what
"specimens" Serbs are.'
"'Just
after the Muslim conquest, the caliph in Damascus is said to have received
30,000 Christian slaves sent from Spain. As one fifth of all booty was owed to
the caliph, the total bag must have been reported as 150,000,' reports
historian William D. Philips Jr. 'Fair-skinned female
Saqaliba [Slavs] were prized as concubines, their price varying according to
their beauty and their talent as dancers and singers,' reports Theodore Pulcini. 'Hundreds of thousands of
dirhams' have been "found in Scandinavia and
the Slavic lands' are evidence of the massive number of Slavs enslaved by
Muslims. 'The slave population needed to be constantly replenished … through
warfare, raiding, and trade. Slavic 'women and eunuchs populated [Muslim]
harems.'
In addition to
ruthless warfare, Islam offers Christians and Jews three choices: convert,
submit to taxation and humiliating subjugation, or die. When you, my Turkish
friend, watched, say, videos of the Islamic State offering these choices to
Christian captives, whom they later decapitate on camera, do
you think of your ancestors? How do those thoughts make you feel about your
current Turkish, Muslim identity and the choices that faced your not-Turkish,
not-Muslim ancestors?"
Spencer closes Empire
of God with these words. "As long as there are men among us who are
pious, wise, learned, respectful of the Greek philosophical tradition, the
Greco-Roman literary tradition, and the Judeo-Christian theological tradition,
aware of the achievements of their ancestors, and unwilling to repudiate them,
conscious of the rights and dignity of each human being, the Roman Empire has
never fallen and can never fall."
It's not just
Byzantium's ideas, art, and spirit that live on. Her flesh-and-blood
descendants live on, as well. May the scales fall from their eyes and may they,
someday, through the grace of God, discover, and return to, who they really
are.
Danusha Goska is the
author of God Through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery
No comments:
Post a Comment