Tyre Nichols skateboarding / Source NPR |
When I was sixteen, I committed an evil deed. The victim was an innocent girl who not only had never harmed me, she had gone out of her way to be nice to me. When my evil deed reached the ears of Mr. H, the vice principal, he was flabbergasted. "Why did you do this?" He didn't know me, but he had enough intel to know that "You are normally a shy and quiet girl who has never given any of your teachers a moment's trouble."
In fact I often
was sound asleep in class, something none of my teachers remarked upon. Mr. H
was an old man – maybe forty, or even forty-five. He had been doing this work
for longer than I had been alive. He made a disparaging comment about my four
older brothers, their wild ways, and bad blood. He stared at me as if I were a
new breed of sick freak he had not yet encountered. He assigned me to ten weeks
detention and we never spoke again. The detention, ten weeks of sitting for an
hour in a room after the end of the school day, gave me more opportunities to
sleep. I was working full time at a physically taxing job and I was often too
afraid to sleep at home.
When I
committed the evil deed, I felt no empathy for my victim. I felt no shame at my
own debasement. For years afterward, I never thought about it. It's only recently
that I look back and witness what I did, as if watching a movie with a sudden,
shocking twist. The worst aspect of this movie is that, for years, I felt
nothing. I wish I could say that I felt horribly guilty. I didn't. I reverted
to that ice cold state. In most of my life, including when I was in high
school, I have felt and I feel empathy for others. Can you be a psychopath for
an eyeblink of your life's span?
What was my
evil deed? I was verbally abusive of a vulnerable classmate. If you think that
doesn't sound like much of an evil deed, you don't understand the power of
words, and you don't understand teenage girls. My words were so vicious the
girl left the school.
When I try to
understand the problem of evil, I think about this event. I recognize that evil
is part of the human condition. Evil is not something out there that other
people do. Evil is something in here and it entraps me just as it entraps
others No, I'll never have the power of a Hitler and I'll never have on my
hands the blood of millions. But I, like all humans, have power and exercise
that power and sometimes consciously choose to exercise that power in a way
that harms others.
In a 2002 PBS
documentary addressing the September 11 terror attacks, Ann Ulanov, the Christiane Brooks Johnson
Memorial Professor of Psychiatry and Religion at Union Theological Seminary,
was asked to define evil. She mentioned, and then rejected, contemporary
theories that write evil off as a side effect of mistreatment. People can be
mistreated and yet not lash out in evil ways. Indeed, "Everybody
Hurts," as REM sang. Some people endure painful injustice and
do not go down the road to evil. Think of Elie
Wiesel and Wladyslaw Bartoszewski, Auschwitz survivors
who devoted their lives to humanitarian service. Ulanov describes how some people
choose to cultivate a sense of victimization and when they do that, they
encounter a force that invites them to use their sense of victimization to
justify their destruction of others.
"From
the psychological side, there are theories that say destructiveness comes from
privation and deprivation. It isn't something in itself; it's from bad
parenting or low self-esteem. What religion … offers is a recognition that evil
is a force … an active force of absence to vitiate, annihilate, destroy … It's
not something that is caused by the blows of fate … pieces of you have been
destroyed, mangled, treated as if they are of no value. You can get to your
outrage, your absolute determination to retaliate for vengeance … you feel that
because of something done to you. But deeper than that, it's like an undertow
of the ocean … There's something that you contact that's much bigger than what
you did to me or what I'm going to do to you. And you get caught in that;
you're in something that's outside yourself … you're caught in what the New
Testament calls principalities and powers. It's a power that catches you, and
you are not enough by yourself to defeat it."
Ulanov mentions
"principalities and powers." That is "something that's much
bigger than you … you are not enough by yourself to defeat it." This is an
allusion to Ephesians 6:12: "For we wrestle not
against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against
the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high
places." One can surmise that Ulanov is talking about Satan.
I have to
acknowledge that I'll never overcome evil permanently. I can't even overcome it
in so simple a way as to fully comprehend it. For the life of me I can't
understand why I was so cruel to that girl in high school. Given that I can't
fully understand or permanently defeat evil, I recognize that I and all humans
require a mechanism for dealing with evil on a daily basis, and sometimes on a
minute-to-minute basis.
A culture's successful
mechanism for dealing with evil must go much farther than inducing calm or happy
feelings. As increasing numbers of people in the West abandon Judeo-Christian
practices and values, other methods are applied. WNYC, New York City's NPR
affiliate, broadcasts a daily "moment of zen" during which a
meditation teacher encourages listeners to focus on their breathing and become
"mindful" of their various body parts, i.e., "Think about your
feet." Other approaches offer "self care" and
"feelgood." If you've just used an Oprah-approved body lotion and you
feel good, you are virtuous. The decades since high school when I felt zero
discomfort about my evil deed constitute a virtuous amnesia in this worldview.
If our system
for addressing evil talks only about our subjective states of happiness,
pleasure, or calm, it cannot address the evil deeds we commit with
indifference, or the ones we justify to ourselves, or the ones we don't even
consciously recognize, or the evil that feels seductively good. A courageous
and honest mechanism for dealing with evil has to fearlessly insist that the
visceral pleasure we feel when beating up a weaker opponent, or watching
S&M porn, is in fact a parasitic lifeform that feeds upon our best selves.
Evil, and
subsequent guilt and shame, are inevitable waste products of the human
experience. In that, evil deeds and guilt are comparable to bodily waste and
garbage. A mechanism is required to deal with all these waste products. We need
toilets and sewer systems. We need garbage collection. A competent mechanism
for dealing with evil has to offer us a road to ablution and renewal. We have
to find a way back to our best selves, even after our worst deeds. We need to
channel evil and guilt in order for individuals and society to function.
Otherwise, they would choke us. We would all be nothing more than our worst
deeds. We would all have reason to hate each other in perpetuity.
Christophobes
mock Christianity's emphasis on forgiveness. I cherish Christianity's emphasis
on forgiveness. It allows me to live beyond having been the girl who committed
that evil deed. In the same way that I want to be forgiven, I respect God's
insistence on forgiveness for others.
Catholicism
provides a mechanism. Catholics are advised to perform an examination of conscience daily. Confession
provides a penance and absolution.
When praying
the first sorrowful mystery of the rosary, which commemorates Jesus in
Gethsemane before his crucifixion, Catholics pray for "the gift of
contrition." For years I prayed that prayer and I could understand no
reason for praying it. Why should I ask to feel "contrition" – that
is, "the state of feeling remorseful and penitent"? Like every other
self-absorbed malefactor, blinded by my own self-pity, along with Shakespeare's
King Lear, I insisted I was one "more sinned against than sinning." I
was somehow convinced that having been a victim in my life, which I certainly
was, I didn't also have the power to victimize others, which I certainly did.
When viewing
the world through the "I'm the victim here" lens, I saw other human
beings as merely beads on an abacus. I could slide these human beings, mere
beads to me, into the "hurt" position to rectify my own account. I
failed to recognize that those who abused me engaged in the exact same
self-exculpating, ethical legerdemain. We all played our part in that perverse
economics, that filthy cycle of, "Someone hurt me, so I can now pass on
the pain to an innocent bystander."
I didn't want
to ask to feel contrition, but, when praying that first sorrowful mystery of
the rosary, I did. Though I felt no personal, emotional urge to pray this
prayer, I asked because I am Catholic and I am invested in a system that values
the wisdom of our ancestors in faith who have been working on ethical issues
for millennia. They invited me to ask for "contrition" as a "gift,"
and so I did. And, decades after my abuse of an innocent girl, either through
God's intervention or my own maturation, I finally realized that I had reason
to feel contrition.
Not only the
Judeo-Christian tradition offers the West a model for dealing with sin and
redemption. Almost five centuries before Christ, Aeschylus told a Greek tale of
sin, penance, and redemption. The god Apollo ordered Orestes to kill his
mother, Clytemnestra, to avenge a murder she had committed. Orestes did so, but
he was then tormented by Furies, phantom women with snakes for hair and bloody
eyes. Matricidal Orestes wandered in solitary punishment for years. Afterwards,
"I have been taught by misery," he announced. Orestes returned to
Athens and asked for a trial. Apollo announced that he, Apollo, was responsible
for Clytemnestra's murder. Orestes would have none of it. "I, not Apollo,
was guilty of my mother's murder." The Furies that had tormented Orestes
transformed into the Eumenides, beneficent protectors. Orestes acceptance of
punishment, and admission of guilt, erased the age-old curse on his family, the
House of Atreus. "Neither he nor any descendent of his would ever again be
driven into evil by the irresistible power of the past."
On Thursday,
January 26, 2023, I began to notice media announcements that videorecordings of
the arrest of a 29-year-old black man, Tyre Nichols, would be released at six
p.m. on Friday, January 27. Nichols, media informed me, had died three days
after a traffic stop in Memphis. I felt blasé. I wasn't blasé about the death;
I was blasé about media exploiting death in service to a leftist agenda. Even
so, I felt it was my civic duty to watch the video.
After watching
the Memphis video, I stared into space for several minutes. I warned my social
media contacts to think long and hard about whether or not to watch it. What I
saw on that video was five men beating one tall, thin man. The beating they
delivered was certainly enough to kill. Nichols was six foot three but, because
of Crohn's disease, he weighed only 145 pounds.
Video shows
Nichols being punched, kicked, pepper-sprayed, tazed, and beaten with a baton. Police
bark orders. In fact they issued "71 Commands in 13
Minutes." "Officers gave Tyre Nichols impossible … contradictory and
unachievable orders … The punishment was severe – and eventually fatal." While
Nichols is pinned down by two police officers, another officer threatens, "Watch
out, I'm going to baton the f--- out of you." One officer says, "That
motherf---er made me spray myself." The officer is thus announcing that,
even as his colleagues beat a restrained man, he, the police officer
participating in a brutal beating, is the real victim. Someone else, a man
dehumanized through the expletive, "motherf---er" "made him"
pepper spray himself. After Nichols is handcuffed, he is punched in the back of
the head. He is so weak he can't sit. Officers prop him up and do not deliver
medical aid. An ambulance arrives over twenty minutes after officers announce
that Nichols is in custody.
The beating
appears not to have been delivered in an uncontrollable frenzy. Officers walk
away, walk back, assault Nichols, stop, and restart. Officers chat about
whether they pepper-sprayed themselves in the eye or the eyebrow. "I hope
they stomp his ass," says an officer who is not engaged in any struggle
with Nichols. The officer who kicks Nichols in the head and punches him in the
face has just arrived on the scene. The officer who beats Nichols in the back is
also a recent arrival. Once Nichols is propped up, officers fist bump each
other and pat each other on the back. They laugh.
Five men on
one. Five heavily armed policemen participating in the beating of an unarmed citizen
who is restrained and can't defend himself. Five officers of the peace not offering
medical aid to a human body that is clearly in extremis. These videos record
evil. Afterward, police filed a false report. Evil demands more evil;
lies to protect the guilty and slander the innocent dead.
The five
officers who have been charged with "second-degree murder, aggravated assault, aggravated
kidnapping, official misconduct and official oppression" are
Tadarrius Bean, Demetrius Haley, Emmitt Martin III, Desmond Mills Jr., and
Justin Smith. In their biographies, one reads of men loved and respected by
friends and family. In their professional photos one sees handsome,
proud men. They are all black.
In recent
years, American life has been focused on the accusation that there is an
epidemic of white police officers shooting unarmed black men to death for no
reason other than white supremacy. This accusation has dramatically changed
American sports, relationships, work life, education, politics, and religious
activity.
One might think
that the death of Tyre Nichols, allegedly at the hands of five black men, would
make it impossible for activists to revert to that narrative. That is not the
case. In fact prominent voices are indeed insisting that Tyre Nichols' real
killer was white supremacy.
National Public
Radio's Sunday morning host, Ayesha Rascoe, an African American woman, featured
a broadcast on "How Black People Can
Cope with the Trauma of Witnessing Repeated Death and Violence against Them."
Note that in Rascoe's narrative, black people are not committing acts of
violence against anyone. Black people are always and only the victims of racist
violence committed by whites.
In the
broadcast, guest Dr. Alisha Moreland-Capuia, from Harvard Medical School,
supports Rascoe's narrative. "All human beings require safety." Dr.
Moreland-Capuia says. But black people in America can never be safe.
"It's
unsustainable," Rascoe says. "How are black people surviving?"
"Many
folks are hanging on by a thread," Moreland-Capuia replies. Black people
face "microaggressions" from white racists. Because of this, black
people have shorter lifespans.
"How can
we cope with the trauma?" Rascoe asks.
"Take the
time just to do some breathing," Moreland-Capuia offers a "moment of
zen" solution.
In another broadcast, Rascoe chats with novelist Nick
Brooks. "Systems," she insists, control black people's behavior. If
black people treat other black people badly, Rascoe and Brooks insist, white
supremacy is ultimately to blame.
Brooks blames
any bad behavior from black people on "generational trauma" caused by
"America, whiteness, and the patriarchy." White supremacy is also
responsible for child abuse in black households. "You can literally trace
that all the way back to the plantation or something … The toxic traits that we
have are a reflection of the position we've been put in. The [black] kids are
not inherently bad. The people aren't inherently bad," Brooks says.
On Meet the Press on January 29,
2023, Yamiche Alcindor declared that fear and outrage at the Nichols' arrest
video was the exclusive property of black people "Black families are
waking up this morning traumatized and are worried about sending their children
out in the street. Black men are driving cars and hoping they don't get pulled
over. People that are pregnant [note that Alcindor does not say 'pregnant women']
with Black boys are worried right now that they could ever see their child that
they've made for nine months be killed in a matter of minutes because of this.
I don't know that people see this, the people that are most impacted by this,
which I will say, frankly, are Black people."
On This Week, Martha Raddatz helped
the attorney Ben Crump identify "racial bias" as the cause of the "the
brutality, the profanity, the lack of humanity" exhibited in the video.
The New York Times insisted that "all
the way back to the origin of law enforcement in this country … is a history
rooted in slave patrols and militias designed to protect white people's lives
and livelihoods from rebellion among enslaved Black people." And "America has once again failed
Black people who were pleading for help and demanding it. America should be
ashamed."
Democratic
Congressman Maxwell Frost, son of a Haitian father, tweeted that "The
murder of Tyre Nichols is anti-Black and the result of white supremacy."
CNN's Van Jones wrote that Nichols' death was "driven by racism." The
Atlantic's Jemele Hill tweeted, "The entire system of policing is
based on white supremacist violence." "White Supremacy Killed Tyre
Nichols," insisted John Pavlovitz. "Black police officers
can be just as implicated in the violent white supremacy of policing as can
officers who are not Black," said The Guardian. WNYC, New York
City's NPR affiliate, hosted a program Monday morning dedicated to
insisting that Tyre Nichols was a victim of white supremacy, and that police
brutality is a problem affecting only "black and brown" people. In a CNN interview, New York City Mayor Eric
Adams, himself a black man and a former police officer, said that even though
Nichols' assailants were black, "race is still on the table of when a
culture of policing historically has treated those from different groups
differently, even when the individuals are from that same group." Mayor
Adams offered this insight, "Abusive behavior creates abuse." And on and on. Mainstream media exerted
excessive force: one must acknowledge that white supremacy was behind the death
of Tyre Nichols.
FOX news
presented an alternative point of view. Ben Jealous, former president and CEO
of the NAACP, mentioned that whites as well as blacks have
been brutalized and killed by police. He also said that changing the skin color
of police doesn't improve policing. He said that, rather, those who hire police
must attend to "authoritarian personality types" who are more likely
to abuse. Jealous has been stressing this point for years. After the death of
George Floyd, Jealous said, "Talk to criminologist
after criminologist, you look at the officers who are most likely to pull the
trigger, what they may or may not have in common is racism or implicit bias.
What they all seem to have in common is high levels of authoritarianism."
Leftists are exploiting
the Memphis atrocity to support well-worn planks of the Black Lives Matter
platform. All of those BLM planks are lies that harm black people. There is no
epidemic of white police murdering unarmed black men without any mitigating
circumstances. See here, here, and here. In fact many of BLM's proof cases involve
non-white officers, for example Sergeant Kizzy Adoni, a black woman who
supervised the arrest of Eric Garner; black officers who participated in the
arrest of Freddy Gray; non-white Jeronimo Yanez, who shot Philando Castile to
death during a traffic stop; non-white Tou Nmn Thao and J. Alexander Kueng, who
participated in and were charged after the arrest and death of George Floyd. Derek
Chauvin was married to a non-white woman and Minnesota Attorney General Keith
Ellison, himself a black Muslim, said that he found no evidence that Derek
Chauvin was a racist who acted in a racist way toward George Floyd. "We
don't have any evidence that Derek Chauvin factored in George Floyd's race as
he did what he did."
It's not true
that whites are never victimized in the way that blacks are. See Justine Ruszczyk, a white woman murdered by
black Muslim police officer Mohamed Noor; Tony Timpa, a white man who died after
being restrained by a diverse group of police, including at least one black cop and one
Hispanic cop, none of whom were found guilty; Timothy Coffman; and Daniel Shaver. The video
of Shaver is as difficult to watch as is the Memphis video.
Astoundingly, the officer who shot Shaver dead was found not guilty. John
McWhorter, himself black, acknowledges that whites, too, have been
brutalized and killed by bad cops.
It's not true
that all deaths of blacks in custody can be accurately subsumed into the
narrative of the killer cop whose only possible motive is white supremacy.
Michael Brown, for example, was a physically imposing young man who had just
committed a violent crime, and was struggling with an officer, trying to get
the officer's gun. Rather than telling this true account, the "Hands up;
don't shoot" "gentile giant" fairy tale was invented.
It's not true
that white supremacy is the only possible reason for a difficult relationship
between blacks and police. See this report by the U.S. Department of Justice. Blacks commit a
significantly higher proportion of violent crime. Anti-social behavior, as
acknowledged by black scholars including John Ogbu, John McWhorter, and Orlando
Patterson, is celebrated and encouraged in an "oppositional" black
subculture. The victims of violent crimes committed by blacks are often
themselves black. Statistics suggest that in one age bracket,
young black men are twenty-two times more likely to be shot to death than young
white men.
It's not true
that white police officers are an occupying army in majority minority
communities. I have lived and worked most of my life in majority-minority
communities. For the most part, police are simply not around, but black people
would like them to be. "Blacks want police to retain local presence,"
reported Gallup in 2020.
I see crime
everyday. Drug deals, drug use, physical fights, dangerous and illegal driving,
threats, noise, dumping not just of litter but of used televisions and toxic
substances, public defecation, prostitution, child abuse, animal abuse and
abandonment, and arson, are among the daily sights. Most often I see no police
intervention. I have seen police-community interactions, from murder
investigations to police handling junkies who have overdosed. Police have
clearly been trained to deescalate tensions.
As a white
woman living in a majority-minority neighborhood I have been physically
assaulted numerous times. Once, I was almost killed. Ironically my assailants
were targeting each other; I had unwittingly stepped between warring gangs of
young black men. I called police, waited three hours for an officer to arrive,
only for him to tell me that "You should not be living in this
neighborhood." There were ample witnesses. No action was taken. My
neighbor, a short, elderly white man, was cold-cocked by a young black male. The
elderly white victim called police. No action was taken. The "military
occupation" myth is believable only by BLM's strongest demographic, rich,
white liberals who never set foot in majority-minority neighborhoods.
Laser focus on
the racist-white-cop / helpless-black-victim narrative is a cynical,
manipulative, power play. Leftists want to undermine American society for their
own reasons, reasons that have nothing to do with uplifting black people. Leftists
lie. America, right now, is the best place on earth to be black. Universities,
professions, sports, the arts, desperately want black participation and black
advancement. Entire university and corporate departments are dedicated to
finding, funding, and mentoring tomorrow's black achievers in every field. That
leftists encourage blacks to cower in fear and to believe that only a Marxist
revolution can rescue them from the evil white man is a national tragedy.
Leftists' lack
of real concern for blacks is evident in response to the Memphis video. Streets
are calm. Social media response is muted. Why? Nichols was beaten by black
cops. If Nichols had been beaten by white cops, America's streets would look
like the mouth of the Kilauea Volcano. Rioters, looters, and arsonists, as they
did after the Floyd video, would hit their marks, not motivated by love for
black people, but by hate for a perceived enemy tribe.
As I watched the
Memphis video, I thought of Derrion Albert. In 2009, sixteen-year-old Derrion,
an honors student, was walking home in Chicago when he was beaten to death on
camera. His teenage assailants' weapon of choice were railroad ties, applied
with force to Derrion's skull. Onlookers filmed the beating; you can see it on
the web. Black boys beat an innocent black boy to death because their victim
was in the wrong place at the wrong time.
As I watched
the Memphis video, I thought of being twenty-two years old, teaching high
school in the South Bronx. A black student misbehaved. I reported him. Later,
one of his parents arrived, called him to the front of the room, pulled down
his pants, and beat his exposed buttocks with a belt in front of the class. No
doubt that parent thought that he was doing the right thing.
I thought of
one of my forebears, an immigrant coal miner. He was ambushed one night and
beaten with boards with nails in them. His assailants were what my relative,
who would later find the body, called "Johnny Bulls," that is,
"English, Irish, Scotch, and Welsh."
I thought of my
fellow Poles, some of whom, during the Holocaust and after, committed
atrocities against Jews.
I thought of my
mother telling me that one night she went out looking for my father, who had
gotten drunk. He was lying in the street, and police were kicking my helpless
father in his stomach.
And I thought
about what I did to that girl in high school.
I thought of
the problem of evil.
I don't know
what reform would prevent another beating like the one we see on the Memphis
video. Of course it's obvious that the denigration of all police in the past
three years has drastically reduced the number and quality of applicants for
police positions. At the same time, departments have been pressured to accept
"diverse" applicants and, in response to this pressure, unsuitable
diverse applicants become police; see here. We can't demand better police at the
same time that we demonize police.
I know this
much. Evil is universal and inescapable. Like bodily waste, like garbage, evil
and subsequent guilt are inevitable byproducts of human life. They must be
dealt with so that society does not choke on them.
The
Judeo-Christian tradition offers mechanisms for dealing with evil and guilt,
and ways for individuals to be less likely to commit evil with a sense of
impunity, and more likely to be rehabilitated after inevitable lapses. As that
tradition wanes, society struggles for new ways to address evil. Many have
chosen to revert to the pre-Christian concept of tribal identification as a
measure of vice or virtue. "My tribe good; your tribe bad." The BLM
narrative fully supports tribalism. Blacks are innocent victims; whites are
brutal oppressors who never experience injustice. Even when the fist, the
taser, the baton, the railroad tie, are wielded by blacks attacking blacks,
whites must be singled out as the perpetrator. This insistence robs blacks of
agency. Someone who cannot be responsible for his own actions will always be a
child. In this case, only white leftists are allowed the privilege of
adulthood, even an adulthood tainted with guilt. At least whites are not
children.
John Pavlovitz,
the above-linked leftist Christian pastor, in his blog post addressing the
Memphis video, works very hard to prove that it was in fact white people who
killed Tyre Nichols. "Circuitous miles of pipes" bring water to our
faucets. The black officers who beat Nichols are merely "the spigot."
"White supremacy is the plumbing." Pavlovitz is the white leftist who
gets to be an adult, and blacks get to be, perpetually, Pavlovitz's helpless
children.
Pastor
Pavlovitz, it's a shame that you don't realize how contemptuous you are of
black people. It's a shame that you don't realize how ego-driven your
"Christian" writing is. You want to be seen as the savior of blacks,
and for you to be big enough to be the savior of all blacks, you must make
black people very, very small.
Pastor
Pavlovitz, when I was sixteen, I committed an evil deed. And that's all I need
to say. Following your template, I could talk about what it was like for me to
be an abused kid. I could talk about the hundreds of years of oppression of my
peasant ancestors in Eastern Europe, about how the word "slave"
entered Arabic and European languages because we, Slavs, were their property. But
I don't want to do that. I did a bad thing. Me. Not Viking or Muslim slave
traders, not Czars, not Soviets, not Nazis, not coal mine owners, not my
parents, not the kids who called me "fat and retarded." No. It was I.
I had a choice not to do a bad thing, or to do a bad thing. I chose the latter.
I am guilty. I am, finally, ashamed. I confess. I ask God for forgiveness,
absolution, and to be a better person from this moment forward. Every human
being deserves that much respect – to be expected to be responsible for their
own freely made choices, including the choice to commit evil. And every human
being, having been given that choice, has the next choice. To perform the process
necessary for redemption.
Tyre Nichols
was a joyful, enthusiastic photographer. See his images here.
Danusha Goska
is the author of God through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery
No comments:
Post a Comment