Does Billy Eichner's Box Office Bomb Prove that America Is Homophobic?
Bros is advertised as groundbreaking. Universal, a major studio,
produced it. It cost $22 million, and its advertising budget is estimated at
$40 million. The film opened "wide," that is on 3,350 nationwide screens.
Judd Apatow, a big name in comedy, co-produced. Bros was a spectacular
flop. It took in only about $5 million in its opening weekend.
On Sunday, October 2, before the weekend
had even concluded, Billy Eichner, who stars and co-wrote Bros' script, went
public to accuse the audiences who refused to pay to see his movie. They are homophobes. "Even with glowing reviews
and great Rotten Tomatoes scores … straight people … just didn’t show up for Bros."
Eichner singled out the South and the Midwest as benighted regions that could not
accept the film.
Bros is marketed as a romantic comedy. Romantic comedy is often dismissed as a silly, unimportant genre. That's at least partly because romantic comedy is a genre associated with women, and also because, in recent years, the quality of films in this genre has dramatically deteriorated. That decay of the genre says much about sexual confusion in the wider culture. Done right, romantic comedy is as worthy a cultural product as any other genre, including the "serious" ones like war, spy, epic, courtroom, and crime movies. The place romantic comedy used to occupy in American culture, and the abysmal quality of recent efforts like Bros, says much, none of it encouraging, about the trajectory of relationships, maturity levels, and sex roles in America.
Scholars trace the origins of romantic
comedy to Ancient Greek fertility rites. I trace romantic comedy to a film that
has never been bettered, Frank Capra's 1934 It Happened One Night. It
Happened One Night establishes a standard for the best of what romantic
comedy can offer. What, exactly, does romantic comedy offer?
It Happened One Night is eye candy. It offers beautiful
clothes, sets, and people. Beauty is hard work. Lighting, sound, set direction,
costumes, gestures, as well as faces and bodies, all have to work together to
click into a harmonious whole. One discordant note and the visual symphony clangs
to the ground as visual cacophony. I live in a post-industrial, low income
city. Trash and junkies litter our streets. Films that usher me into ninety
minutes of beauty are essential for me.
Claudette Colbert stars as Ellie, a
headstrong heiress escaping her domineering father, in It Happened One
Night. Colbert's huge, wide set eyes, button nose, bee stung lips and cute
little body were made for a romantic comedy heroine, and oh those legs! Legs
that she famously bared to stop traffic when
hitchhiking. Colbert's almost pre-pubescent body and cherubic face contrasted
marvelously with her voice, so knowing, so tuned for deadpan sarcasm that sliced
right through any folly. Her voice could drop to a feline growl capable of
expressing surprisingly smoldering, vulnerable desire.
Colbert's co-star, Clark Gable, playing
newspaperman Peter Warne, bared his well-toned chest, and a probably false legend arose that
undershirt sales dropped by 75%. Colbert and Gable are simply two beautiful
human beings. The camera flatters them, always. There's not a single shot in
this film when you are reminded that both were flawed – Gable had false teeth
and Colbert had a rather flattish chest.
Romantic comedies should live up to the
second part of their name and they should make audiences laugh. In It
Happened One Night, Ellie jumps a budget night bus from Florida to New
York. Character actor Roscoe Karns appears as Oscar
Shapely, a traveling salesman. Shapely tries to seduce Ellie with
slimy, ridiculous, fast talking innuendo. Shapely's lust is disgusting,
menacing, and laughable. Capra took a real life situation – the dangers
threatening a pretty, naïve young woman traveling alone on a night bus – and he
whipped that into a comic merengue. Capra hands the ultimate victory to Ellie,
and he makes Shapely look ridiculous. As a woman who has been harassed on
public transport, I cherish this scene more than more heavy-handed and
unrealistic depictions of feminist conquest in films like Thelma and Louise and
Wonder Woman.
And that's what romantic comedies do and
do very well. They take the moment in time that they inhabit and they turn that
moment into lighthearted art. It Happened One Night takes place during
the Depression, and Depression-era America is evident in scene after scene. An unemployed
widow, traveling with her young son, faints from hunger. Bus passengers pool
donations. Passengers are bored, and they begin a spontaneous sing-along. Road
thieves rob travelers. A desperate man barters for gas. The gas station
attendant accepts a fedora in exchange for a full tank.
I feel, when I'm watching this
low-budget, lighthearted comedy, that I'm watching as valid a glimpse of
Depression-era America as any documentary that PBS might produce. Actor and director
John Cassavetes said that, "Maybe there never was an America in the
thirties. Maybe it was all Frank Capra." Capra, a Sicilian immigrant, and
a director at Columbia, a relatively minor and low-budget studio, was able to
create, through romantic comedies, an image of American life in his time that
was so powerful that viewers took it as reality.
Romantic comedies, at their best, feed
our need for beauty, for escape, for humor, and for a mirror that crystallizes
the time we live in. Romantic comedies also, again, at their best, tell us
something about that which our hearts most desire: love, sex, relationships,
marriage, children, and a future. Critics slam romantic comedies as formulaic.
"The boy and the girl meet cute. There are complications. They end up
together. The end."
Such criticism misses the point. No one
goes to Swan Lake to see how the plot turns out. Anyone who has even
just seen the poster knows what's going to
happen. It's a dark fairy tale. A virginal prince falls in love with a cursed
waterfowl. Things, unsurprisingly, end badly. Audiences don't buy tickets for
the "what," as in "What happens next?" They go for the
"how," for how the prima ballerina will carry out the demanding
choreography. Odile must execute thirty-two
fouettés, a move that audiences love to witness but that exhausts
dancers to perform. You watch Swan Lake to have your breath taken away
by the how, the magic of a human body, through choreography, transforming into
a swan. You go to witness this.
"The two become one flesh:"
that's as difficult as thirty-two fouettés. Opposites attract and work things
out; if that were not true, none of us would be here. Men and women are
different, with different agendas. He may want quick and no-commitment
coupling. She may want nothing to do with him, but if they are to get together,
it will be with a commitment. The magic a good romantic comedy conjures is a
reflection of the very demanding choreography we all perform if we want to have
anything to do with our fellow humans.
Gable's character, Peter Warne, is a
hard-drinking, arrogant, unemployed newspaper reporter. Peter and Ellie hate
each other, not just because of his arrogance and her hoity-toity snobbery.
They hate each other for reasons of socioeconomic class. Class is a Molotov
cocktail in the depths of the Depression. In 1933, unemployment was at 25%.
There were droughts, heat waves, and dust storms. The famous "White Angel Bread Line" photo is dated
1933. When Capra put a poor but smart working man and an heiress on the same
night bus, he was playing with fire.
How Capra gets Ellie and Peter to fall in love – how he
performs the thirty-two fouettés – is the payoff for the viewer. It really is
chemistry. Two volatile elements crash into each other and create a new compound,
one more valuable and more stable than two separate elements.
Peter and Ellie must unite against a
common enemy, an enemy many feared in the Depression. They are both on the run,
trying to evade discovery by Ellie's father. Lawmen enter their motel and
demand identification. Peter and Ellie spontaneously
improvise a comedy routine that throws the lawmen off their scent. They
make each other laugh and they share triumph when the lawmen leave. Later, they
camp out in a hay field. Ellie becomes frightened and cries out. Peter comforts
her – and boy oh boy does Mother Nature toss the sparks between them. The
cinematography in this scene is pure magic; the dew-moistened hay glistens like a field
of stars.
Peter tries to push Ellie to become more
like him. He teaches her how to dunk donuts, and how to hitchhike. The one
becoming more like the other is a constant theme in romantic comedy, and in
real relationships. Also, in Peter's comical lessons for Ellie, Capra is
imparting a larger lesson to his desperate audiences. "You are poor,"
he is saying, "And life is hard. You may fantasize how wonderful it would
be to be rich. But you know how to make the best of even small things: donuts
and coffee; the open road. This rich girl needs to learn from you. Monetary
wealth is not everything. Appreciate what you have that even the rich don't."
Slowly but surely, Ellie does become
more like Peter. She forgets her fiancée and kneels
by Peter's bed one night, ready to throw caution to the winds and surrender
to a reckless night of passion. But chemistry has been working on Peter, as
well. At the beginning of the film, there's no doubt that pre-Ellie Peter would
have jumped at the offer of a one-night-stand. But Peter has come to care about
Ellie, and this care has matured him. "You'd better go back to your bed,"
he tells her. He doesn't say this because he doesn't want her; clearly he does.
He says this because love has changed him. He doesn't have a job, and Ellie is
rich. Peter knows it would benefit neither of them if he jumped into bed, as an
unemployed man, with an heiress. He makes up his mind right then and there –
not to have sex with her immediately, but to find a job so that he can support
the woman he suddenly wants to make his wife.
A man turning down sex he wants. A man
feeling that he must have a job before he can invite a woman into his life. A
man suddenly convinced that he must marry a woman before he makes love to her.
Please don't ever again tell me that romantic comedies have nothing culturally
significant to say.
For once the Academy got it right. It
Happened One Night won the "Big Five" Academy Awards: Best
picture, director, leads, and screenplay. Only two other films have repeated
that feat: 1975's One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest and 1991's The
Silence of the Lambs.
Preston Sturges, Billy Wilder, Howard
Hawks, George Cukor, Leo McCarey, Ernst Lubitsch, Neil Simon, and others made
romantic comedies as sophisticated and essential as It Happened One Night. Doris
Day and Rock Hudson, starring together and with others, made laugh-out-loud
bedroom farces that are just as good today as they were the day they were made.
Woody Allen's 1977 Annie Hall was nominated for the big five; it won
four. Nora Ephron revived romantic comedy as a genre, starting with
1989's When Harry Met Sally through to 1998's You've Got Mail.
With Ephron's death, romantic comedies
have been on life support. American culture has rejected many of the premises.
Men and women must not be understood as significantly different. Women must not
be resistant to uncommitted sex. Men must not behave in any way consistent with
traditional masculinity. Marriage must not be seen as a life goal, or even as a
good.
Even so, romantic comedy refuses to die.
Hints of romantic comedy occur in the endless Austen adaptations. It's okay to
be a traditional male or female if the year on the calendar is 1813, the place
is the English countryside, and the cast of characters are landed gentry. The
TV show Friends was a romantic comedy, with Ross and Rachel struggling
to honor rom-com conventions for ten long, implausible years. The question is
never "Will Ross and Rachel get together?" rather it is, "How?
Will he give up his jealousy and need to control? Will she give up her career,
and will she learn to forgive him for his past mistakes?" People ask these
questions every day.
Bros' publicity campaign insists that Bros is
groundbreaking because it is the first gay romantic comedy by a major studio
featuring an almost all-LGBTQ+ cast. In fact, though, positive depictions of LGBTQ+
themes have been appearing in high-profile entertainment for some time. I saw Personal
Best in 1982, Desert Hearts in 1985, The Crying Game in 1992,
Jeffrey in 1995, and I saw all of these films in mainstream, suburban
movie theaters, including in the Midwest, a region that Eichner condemns as too
backward to appreciate his artistry. Philadelphia in 1993 offered a
heroic depiction of a gay lawyer played by America's male sweetheart, Tom
Hanks. Maurice, starring A-list star Hugh Grant, offered a
poignant depiction of gay male love in 1987, as did Brokeback Mountain in
2005; 2005 also saw the release of Transamerica, a sympathetic depiction
of a trans person. The Imitation Game in 2014 highlighted the heroism
and persecution of mathematician Alan Turing; Transparent premiered that
same year. Fire Island, a gay rom-com which came out earlier in 2022,
has been well received by critics and audiences.
Call Me By Your Name, a 2017 love story between two men, did well at the box office as well as with
critics. It was nominated for numerous awards, including the Oscars for
Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Screenplay, and Best Song. It has a 7.8 rating at IMDB, and a 94% professional
reviewer and an 86% amateur reviewer score at Rotten Tomatoes. Billy Eichner is
incorrect. It's not homophobia that tanked Bros.
Bros may be the first mainstream film to include, in a leading
role, someone like TS Madison. Madison is, in real life, a transgender
prostitute and porn producer and performer. A DuckDuckGo search of TS Madison
coughs up images that look like they were filmed in a bus station bathroom. An
obese man with large breast implants and a large penis performs graphic sex
acts. Madison is known as "Big Dick Bitch" and "Shemale Porn Star."
Commenting on how his johns react to his
obesity, Madison says, "A Black man wants to 'tear that up.' He wants to
put that thing on all fours." Madison imitates women and gets paid to
invite men to treat a female-appearing body as a "thing" that they
"put on all fours." Ironically, Madison produces black trans porn
because "White America dominates us in every aspect." Madison is
proud that he has encouraged black men who appear to be straight to have sex
with trans prostitutes. Women write Madison to say, "That is my baby's
daddy, how did he get on your site?"
At
the Atlanta premier of Bros, Madison greeted other men
in womanface – the trans analogy to blackface – including at least one man
wearing very obvious, not just fake breasts, but fake nipples. Madison insisted
that "chirrun" – children – should watch Bros because "we
have contributions to society." One might ponder for a long time: what
"contributions" have porn performers and prostitutes "had to
society" that children could learn from?
In Bros, Madison stars as a
member of a board launching America's first major LGBTQ+ museum. For this
board, Bros' filmmakers did not choose scholars, loving family members,
or human rights activists. Their choice provides a hint as to how Bros functions
as a romantic comedy.
Porn and romantic comedy are different
genres. They are driven by different narrative engines. That's one reason why
porn films are shorter and are even more formulaic. "Fetish X gives me an
orgasm in Y number of minutes. Done:" that narrative has made Madison a
rich man. Romantic comedy asks different questions. "Do I really want to
grow up, and give up my carefree, independent youth? Do I want someone to be at
the hospital when I get sick? Do I want to make a baby with another? Do I want
to grow old with someone? Do I trust the other enough to name this person on my
Advance Directive form, and in my will? Can I make 'one flesh' with someone who
is so very different from me, and who annoys me and lets me down?"
Attempting to combine porn with romantic
comedy is like attempting to combine sushi with pizza, a financial statement
with a bedtime story. Financial statements demand the kind of catastrophic
thinking that bedtime stories are meant to quell. Porn is meant to
short-circuit long-term thinking and social ballet. Romantic comedies demand
long-term thinking and they don't work at all without adherence to social
ballet – which explains the endless Jane Austen iterations. Social etiquette
was rigid in Regency England. Porn is for an audience of one: a person, his
horniness, and his fetish. Romantic comedy is for all of us, because we are all
the product of two opposites who united to make us.
Romantic comedy, to be successful, must
appeal to the widest possible audience. Any of us should be able to see
ourselves as the leads, so the leads must be attractive enough, and vague
enough, to serve as vicarious surrogates to a wide audience. "Attractive"
does not equal "representational," and not even representational of
white people. Only five percent of white people have blonde hair. Twenty
percent of Americans are obese. Only about a third of American whites have blue eyes. And yet in films the female lead
in a romantic comedy is, more often than not, a thin, blue-eyed blonde, because
that is the person audiences want to look at, and, possibly, look like.
Billy Eichner, for reasons discussed
below, doesn't work as the lead in Bros. Luke Macfarlane is more
conventionally attractive than Eichner, but his is a bland presence. Macfarlane
lacks that mysterious something that creates charisma.
Sex is different for men and women. Men
are more likely to be aroused by paraphilia, fetishes, and visual stimuli. When men have sex with
women, these differences are blunted by women's lesser involvement in behaviors
more typically male. When men have sex with other men, these behaviors become
more prominent. Gay men as a group are more likely to be involved in paraphilia,
fetishes, and to emphasize visual stimuli. Gay men are more likely to be fit than
straight men, because, otherwise, they would not be able to have sex.
Similarly, given women's lesser emphasis on visual stimuli, lesbian women are
more likely to be overweight than straight women.
Men are more open to one-time,
relatively anonymous encounters. This drive is so insistent that gay men
protested being asked to give up such encounters even at the onset of the AIDS
crisis, and the later Monkey Pox outbreak. In July, 2022, a Twitter user
self-identifying as "Babethepigboi" posted that he attended orgies,
"guzzled a metric f---ton of human piss" and "had sexual contact
with somewhere in the ballpark of 15-20 different men." And, yes, he
contracted monkeypox.
How does a gay romantic comedy make the
transition from a genre in which sex is an important milestone, to a population
for whom sex has a significantly different meaning? Bros attempts to
introduce other milestones. For example, its leads attend orgies together.
Bros opens with Billy Eichner appearing as New Yorker Bobby
Leiber delivering a podcast. Eichner / Bobby shouts rather than speaks; his
voice is a monotone. Bobby, the fictional character, is whining that he had
been invited to write a Hollywood rom-com, "Something the whole world
would enjoy."
This request enrages Bobby. Bobby
shouts, "Am I going to get butt f---ed by Jason Mamoa?" Bobby's
position is, "No anal sex, no rom-com!" He doesn't want to make a
movie that the whole world would enjoy. In this scene, we witness Eichner's
self-defeating stance. He wants "straights" in the Midwest and South
to pay to see a movie he guarantees they will not enjoy.
"Love is love?" he screams.
"No, it's not. That's bulls---. Love is not love. Our relationships are
different. Our sex lives are different. Not all gay people are nice." Later
in the film, Bobby will say, "Love is not love. Men are horny, selfish,
and stupid … I don't trust gay mother---ers." He also says, "Gay men
are constantly catering to their own whims and needs which can change on a dime
and we never think about the consequences to the other person … Gay
relationships today are like a clown car. Oh, look, another one. Oh, another
one. Oh, another one." That is, he is pointing out, gay men are promiscuous.
Gay men, Bobby observes, don't like vulnerability because "it is a boner
killer." On The View, Eichner claimed that
he wanted to make a rom-com just like all the other rom-coms he loves. Given
his parameters, that is, given his insistence on smashing the genre's
conventions, it is clear that Eichner wants something that he cannot have.
In short, in the opening scene of Bros,
Bobby, the fictional character played by Billy Eichner, warns the audience
that he does not want to please the audience with "nice" characters
who will "love" each other because "love is not love" and
anal sex and promiscuity are non-negotiable essentials to gay men.
At the film's five minute mark, Bobby is
shown scrolling through Grinder images of bare-chested men. He texts one of
these men and identifies as a "bottom." He goes to the man's
apartment. They say only "Hey, what's up," before they undress, kiss,
fall onto a bed, masturbate, and then part. On the street, Bobby tosses a used
latex glove into a trash can. The scene lasts about two minutes.
Bobby dines with his racially diverse
friends, three of whom have formed a "thruple;" that is, they are now
committed to a threesome. Paul, a thruple member, phones his grandmother and
announces, "Peter and I are jointly f---ing a third person." Grandma
squeals in delight, and repeats the announcement, f-word included, to grandpa. Throughout
the film, the f-word is used repeatedly. I don't think anyone ever says
"make love."
At the ten minute mark, Bobby goes to a
party, where bare-chested men dance in strobe lights to throbbing music. Bobby
meets Aaron Shepard (Luke Macfarlane), a man wearing a baseball cap and endowed
with the chest of a body builder. Bobby tells Aaron that people consider him
"boring." This rude and cruel statement is typical of what Bobby says
to Aaron throughout the film. Bobby's point is that good looking, well-built
men like Aaron are not as deep and intelligent as he is. Bobby is thin with
little musculature, but he considers himself culturally advanced.
"That guy's hot, right?" Aaron
says, pointing to a bare-chested man dancing sinuously atop a table. "I'm
supposed to f--- him and his husband later." We are to understand that Aaron's
telling a stranger that he is about to "f---" two other men is a form
of flirtation. Bobby and Aaron kiss.
At the seventeen minute mark, Bobby is
watching You've Got Mail, a Nora Ephron romantic comedy, and chatting
via Grinder. A man demands a "dick pic." Bobby declines. "Need
to see ass pic," the man then demands. Bobby attempts to shave his
buttocks. He accidentally cuts himself. "How am I gonna s--- now? I can't
f---. I can't s---," he whines, to no one. He tries to take a picture but he
whines that his buttocks "is too f---ing flat." He changes the
lighting to enhance the appearance of his buttocks. He sends the ass pic to the
stranger on Grinder. The stranger views the ass pic and immediately blocks Bobby.
Bobby chairs a meeting planning
America's first major LGBTQ+ museum. A lesbian, three men who identify as
women, and a bisexual shout at each other about each group's competing history.
Each member insists that his group has suffered the most or made the most
significant contributions. One suggests that the museum should host a gay wedding.
Bobby shouts this down. "No!" Weddings and marriage, he insists, are "heteronormative
nonsense. We need to get people to rethink history through a queer prism."
This statement echoes the opening scene,
where Bobby had been asked to make an audience-friendly gay rom-com. Bobby
consistently insists that gay people are different from straight people and
that the rules that apply to straight people do not apply to gay people. These
statements echo Billy Eichner's insistence that Bros is valuable because
it was co-written by a gay man, himself, and it stars LGBTQ+ performers. Eichner
never makes clear how he can use the format of a romantic comedy to make art
that meets his requirements for authentically LGBTQ+ media.
Bobby and Aaron reconnect. Aaron reports
that having sex with the two married men was "fun." "Their
surrogate is pregnant and they're having a gender-reveal orgy." Bobby and Aaron
go to the home of the married male couple. At the film's twenty-nine minute
mark, we see bare-chested Bobby and Aaron kissing. The camera pans down and
reveals that they are simultaneously being fellated by two other naked men,
presumably the expectant fathers whose surrogate is pregnant.
Bobby visits a straight couple and
counsels their young son about being gay, "Jesus had a wife and he was
gay." Bobby enters into a discussion of anal sex in front of this child.
Bobby and Aaron go to the park. Aaron
ogles well-built men. Bobby is jealous. They argue, wrestle and kiss. Realizing
that wrestling is a mutual turn-on, they go to Aaron's apartment, wrestle some
more, and show off their biceps to each other. They also suck on each others'
fingers and toes, and inhale alkyl nitrite, a drug more commonly known as
poppers. This drug relaxes sphincter muscles and facilitates anal sex, which
the two actors then simulate.
They travel to Provincetown. Harvey
Fierstein provides a cameo. "If you want to f---, just let me know."
Fierstein says to them, hitting them on the buttocks. Bobby discovers Aaron
injecting testosterone. "Half the guys I know do this stuff," he
says.
"Half the guys you know are roided
out morons," Bobby replies.
"It doesn't bother you when you
obsess on my body."
Testosterone injection is not further
discussed in the film.
Bobby and Aaron visit a potential museum
donor. He will donate, but only if the museum includes a display dedicated to
gay suffering, featuring a "monstrous Reagan face saying 'Shining city on
a hill' while chasing you."
Shortly after, Aaron and Bobby are
relaxing on a beach. Bobby begins a monologue. Bobby goes on and on about how
victimized he has been in life. During his monologue, he never connects with Aaron.
He never says to this relatively new acquaintance, "I'm pouring a lifetime
of my pain on you. Is that okay? Am I overwhelming you?" Bobby's self-absorption
and lack of awareness of the other's presence made me cringe. It doesn't help
that Eichner, throughout the film, always talks as if he were having a
screaming match with a homeless person on a subway platform with trains
rattling past. Loud, angry shouting alienates.
Add to Bobby's / Eichner's grating voice
his depthless self-pity. He's relaxing with a beer, while sitting in an
Adirondack chair, on a beach in Provincetown, an expensive vacation spot, after
getting a promise of a five million dollar donation, while next to him lounges
his picture-perfect lover. All he can do is think about himself and his own
woes. Never in the film does Bobby / Eichner reveal any concern for anyone
beyond his focus on himself and other gay men as victims.
Bobby and Aaron have an orgy with Josh
and Steve. Josh and Aaron used to play sports in high school. Steve is short
and looks Jewish; he's meant to be both obnoxious and comical. Eichner wants us
to pity Bobby because he's not a muscular gym rat; Eichner tosses in a short,
Jewish-looking guy for comic effect. The abuse of Steve underlines Eichner's
theme: "I want pity for me, but not for anyone else. I will abuse others
in the same way that I accuse others of abusing me." Henry, who is bald,
obese, and effeminate enters next, adding to the general hilarity.
Aaron's parents visit for Christmas. Bobby
buries his lover's polite, soft-spoken, small-town parents under thousands of
pounds of stadium-decibel harangues on gay issues, like a "sex positive
Tiny Tim" in a Fifth Avenue Christmas display window. Bobby orders Aaron's
mother, a second-grade teacher, to indoctrinate her students in gay acceptance.
He says that when he was a boy, his parents took him to a sex show where he
could see, as he puts it, "seven soft penises" and "guys making
out" and "talking dirty." During a sex scene, a man shouted
"pound my prostrate" and "Milk me, milk me." Bobby exposes
to Aaron's parents a secret that Aaron had confided in Bobby alone, a secret he
wanted no one else to know. Aaron's parents display obvious discomfort. Bobby abuses
polite people too nice to put him in his place, his lover's parents, in public,
in a restaurant, on Christmas, as everyone around, including diners and wait
staff, squirms.
Aaron leaves. Bobby chases him. Bobby, rather
than apologizing, screams accusations at Aaron, saying that Aaron is so shallow
that he can only appreciate ripped gym rats, not profound but skinny
intellectuals like himself. When people tell him to speak with greater
sensitivity to others' feelings, they are victimizing him, Bobby insists.
This was long past the point when I had
abandoned any hope that Bros would offer any of the depth,
sophistication, humor, or plumbing of the human heart that can be found in a
well-done romantic comedy. I felt like I was watching a horror movie, and Bobby
was the monster. I don't like gore in movies, but I would have celebrated had Aaron
pulled out a stake and driven it through Bobby's heart.
I have never hated a character in a
movie as much as I hated Bobby. Maybe I disliked Ralph Fiennes as concentration
camp commandant Amon Goeth in Schindler's List more. Or maybe not. It
was the character of Bobby, a joyless, self-pitying, arrogant, destructive,
blind narcissist, with an unforgivably ugly voice, that made Bros impossible
for me.
Bobby goes home and is shown curling up
under a blankie on his couch and crying. Bobby injects steroids, hoping that
that will render him more desirable. He picks up a man at the gym and has sex
with him, after which he goes home, curls up on the couch under a blankie, and
feels sorry for himself some more.
There's a scene towards the end of Annie
Hall. At this point in the movie, Annie (Diane Keaton) has left Alvy (Woody
Allen). Their relationship is irretrievably over. In this scene, an actress playing
someone like Annie says to an actor playing someone like Alvy, paraphrase,
"No, I was wrong. I still love you. Let's not break up. Let's remain
together." The scene is Alvy's fantasy. Annie and Alvy had their moment,
and that moment is gone forever.
Bros ends with a similar scene. The difference here is that the
scene is not presented as Bobby's fantasy. Aaron, who is better looking, better
employed, and nicer than Bobby, Aaron, who has done nothing wrong, approaches Bobby
and apologizes to him. "I know I f---ed up, but please, give me another
chance. I miss you so much."
Bobby, suddenly possessed of the upper
hand, sneers at Aaron's passionate begging. Bobby, again, whines.
"Everyone picks on me for being outspoken and intelligent," he says,
paraphrase. He kisses Aaron, and then walks away, saying, "I don't trust
you."
One method to discern the main character
of a work of fiction is "The main character is the one who changes." Bobby
doesn't change. He was a self-pitying, egotistical, insensitive motormouth at
the beginning and at the end of the film. Aaron, a nice guy, built like a
romance novel cover model, apologizes to Bobby for being offended by Bobby's
obnoxious behavior. Billy Eichner, script co-author, in Bros' finale, is
not opening the door for gay people; other movies did that long before Eichner.
He's vindicating the worst aspects of his own psyche.
Aaron continues to attempt to lure Bobby
back into a relationship. He quits his job and begins creating chocolates.
Bobby had urged Aaron to do just that. Aaron had previously mocked Bobby's LGBTQ+
museum as too full of depressing "Nazi and AIDS history." Aaron's
chocolates now come in Nazi and AIDS themes: a pink triangle "Silence =
Death" box. Bobby didn't have to do anything to forge a bond with Aaron. Aaron
is the one who had to change to satisfy Bobby.
The final thirty minutes of the film are
devoted to the film castigating Aaron for telling Bobby to stop being an
abusive motormouth. Aaron flagellates himself. Aaron's brother yells at him. Bobby's
friends tell him that Aaron was wrong. This wallow has nothing to do with gay
rights or acceptance and everything to do with Eichner's mutant ego.
Bobby and Aaron commit to dating for
three months, after which they will reassess. Because, you know, gay people
don't need anything as old fashioned as marriage, or exclusivity, or commitment,
or romantic comedy conventions.
Danusha Goska is the author of God through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery
I love all the questions which come out of a romantic comedy.
ReplyDeleteHave watched quite a few recently: TICKET TO PARADISE and now my last one was DON'T WORRY DARLING [though the latter was probably not strictly "comedic" - maybe in a Couser sense of the "comic plot"].
And there's a lot between the Ancient Greeks and the 1934 IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT!
The way that advertising drove demand for undershirts - these open chests are appealing.
And how monkeypox is spread these days.
Adelaide