Against Identifying Nazism with
Christianity
http://lightning-and-ashes.blogspot.com/2017/01/against-identifying-nazism-with.html
On January 4, 2017, news broke that four
young Chicagoans kidnapped an 18-year-old, special needs teenager. The
kidnappers bound and gagged their victim, beat and stabbed him, and forced him
to drink from a toilet. The torturers streamed their acts live on Facebook. The
assailants were black. The victim was white.
Within twenty-four hours, the meme #blmkidnapping "became one of the top five Twitter trends."
Those insisting on this connection made
the following arguments. "Black lives matter" implied that white
lives don't matter; BLM rhetoric, including "pigs in a blanket fry 'em
like bacon" and the persistent "Hands up don't shoot" false
narrative motivated multiple killings of innocent police officers. Lenient
responses to riots in Ferguson and Baltimore signaled that elected officials were
handing thugs a carte blanche. In short, Black Lives Matter was responsible for
this heinous crime.
Police said that there was no proven
link between the crime and BLM.
Two things are clear: only dispassionate
investigation can establish causation, and people with an agenda are eager to
link notorious behavior with groups they wish to stigmatize.
+++
The United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum reports that
anti-Semitism has plagued the world for two thousand years. The two-thousand-year limit identifies
anti-Semitism, and, by extension, Nazism, with Christianity. The USHMM links
Nazism to Christian theology. "Early
Christian thought held Jews collectively responsible for the crucifixion of
Jesus. This religious teaching became embedded in both Catholic and
Protestant theology during the first millennium, with terrible consequences for
Jews," the museum states.
Dabru Emet is a September 10, 2000
statement signed by over 220 Jewish rabbis and scholars. Dabru Emet states,
"Without the long history of
Christian anti-Judaism and Christian violence against Jews, Nazi ideology could
not have taken hold nor could it have been carried out."
Auschwitz survivor and Nobel Laureate Elie Wiesel said that the Nazis "had
been reared under Christianity … that showed that there was no barrier in
Christianity preventing the killers from doing their evil."
I
do not believe that Nazi ideology and Nazi mass murder were dependent on or
inspired by Christianity. I believe that Nazism could have arisen in a Europe without
Christianity.
Suppose Greco-Roman Paganism dominated
the European continent until 1933. Or suppose the Reconquista and Charles
Martel failed, and Islam came to dominate Europe. I believe that Nazism could
have claimed the same victims, in the same ways, in a hypothetical Pagan Europe
or Muslim Europe.
In 1918, a virulent strain of influenza
swept the world, killing three to five percent of the world population. Having
had a cold or measles or any other disease beforehand had no impact on
mortality; this particular strain of flu killed healthy, young adults. Nazism is
comparable to the 1918 strain of influenza. Nazism's virulence was not
dependent on or facilitated by previous societal plagues.
The reasons why I do not believe that
Nazism was a Christian phenomenon are below.
* NAZISM ALONE IS NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT SUPPORT FOR NAZI
CRIMES. NAZISM WAS NOT ONLY NOT CHRISTIAN, IT WAS NEO-PAGAN, NATIONALIST AND
SOCIAL DARWINIST, AND OVERTLY ANTI-CHRISTIAN.
Martin Luther's 1543 "On the Jews
and their Lies" is a very anti-Jewish document. Does it make sense to link
it, or other hateful products by Christians, to Nazi crimes against Jews?
Consider the following. Luther condemned Catholicism in equally
inflammatory terms. Examples follow.
"Yesterday I burned the devilish
work of the Pope, and I wish that it was the Pope that was consumed. If you do
not separate from Rome, there is no salvation for your souls … the author of
this Bull is Antichrist: I curse it as a blasphemy against the Son of God… I
trust that every person who accepts this Bull will suffer the torments of hell
… This priest of the Mass and the papacy
is nothing but a work of Satan … Nothing in the whole world is to be hated and
loathed so much as the hypocritical shows of this priesthood, its Masses, its
worship, its piety, its religion. It is better to be a pimp or robber than one
of these priests … Papist and ass are one and the same thing … their tongues
ought to be torn out through the back of their necks, and nailed to the gallows
… It were better that every bishop were murdered … And we would smile did it
happen. All who contribute body, goods … that the rule of the bishops may be
destroyed are God's dear children and true Christians … these Cardinals, these
Popes, and that whole abomination of the Romish Sodom … why do we not wash our
hands in their blood?"
Luther also raged against rebellious
peasants, stating that "anyone who is killed fighting on the side of the
rulers may be a true martyr in the eyes of God." As for peasants, nobles
should "dash them to pieces, strangle them and stab them, just as one is
compelled to kill a mad dog."
We know that in Luther's time nobles
killed an estimated 100,000 peasants. We know that Protestants went on to kill
Catholics in Germany, as did the Nazis.
Do we assume that Luther's work is the
cause of these killings?
I do not. I think that the nobles killed
peasants for the same reasons that the rich and the powerful have always
murdered the poor – because it is in their interests to do so. I do not assume
that, for example, Nazis established a priest's barracks at Dachau because of
Luther's anti-Catholic ravings.
Is there an unbroken trail between
Luther and Nazism? Israeli scholar Alex Bein wrote, "sufficient scholarly research is lacking in this area … There has not
been, as far as I know, a scholarly study of the influence of Luther's
portrayal of the Jews which considers all aspects of the question."
Theologian
and historian Johannes Wallmann argues that "On the Jews and their
Lies" was ignored by 18th and 19th century
anti-Semites, and that
other works took precedence. Andreas
Eisenmenger's 1711 book "Judaism Unmasked" consisted largely of
inflammatory passages from the Talmud and other Jewish writings. It was and
remains an influential anti-Semitic work, and it never mentioned Martin Luther.
Duke University's Hans Hillerbrand, a scholar of the Reformation, writes
that the "larger peculiarities of German history" are better
explanations of anti-Semitism.
Nazis did exploit Luther's famous name
in their pursuit of a course of action they decided on without reference to
Luther. An example can be found in the career of Julius Streicher.
In
1919, Streicher helped to found the Deutschsozialistische Partei a nationalist,
anti-Catholic, and anti-Semitic party. In 1921 he joined the Nazi party. In
1923, he began publishing Der Sturmer, an anti-Semitic and also an
anti-Catholic newspaper. In 1937, Streicher was given a copy of "The Jews
and their Lies" for his birthday. Many authors cite
this as Streicher's first encounter with Luther's work. Note: Streicher was 52
at the time. He had been a leading German anti-Semite for at least 18 years. He
had been publishing the most notorious anti-Semitic newspaper in history for 14
years. And he had never heard of "The Jews and their Lies." This
anecdote calls into question the insistence that Nazis took their marching
orders from Martin Luther.
Nazism's true intellectual roots begin
in the late 18th and early 19th century, with Johann
Gottfried Herder.
Herder advanced nationalism. Nationalists
would attribute supernatural qualities to ethnicity. Ethnic identity, the soil where one was born, one's genetic
relationship to others of the same ethnic group, the flora and fauna of one's
birth region, all had supernatural power. Ethics were to be based on ethnicity.
Jesus defined Christian ethics in Luke
10:25-37: Love God with all your heart; love your neighbor as you love
yourself. Your neighbor is the Samaritan
– the person utterly apart from you. This is a universalist ethic. It emphasizes the brotherhood of all humanity,
established in Genesis, when God created one set of parents, Adam and Eve, for
the entire human race. Pope Pius XI articulated Christianity's incompatibility
with nationalism in the 1922 papal encyclical, "Ubi
Arcano Dei Consilio." "True love of country" must not
be "debased to the condition of an extreme nationalism, when we forget
that all men are our brothers … that other nations have an equal right with us
both to life and to prosperity."
Nationalism rejected universalism. "The savage who loves himself, his wife, and
his child with quiet joy and glows with limited activity for his tribe as for
his own life is a more genuine being than that cultured shade who is enchanted
by the shadow of his whole species," Herder wrote. One must love one's
own tribe, not the "whole species" of humanity. Herder continues:
"No greater injury can be inflicted on a nation than to be robbed of her
national character, the peculiarity of her spirit and her language … Read Tacitus:
'The tribes of Germany, who never degrade themselves by mingling with others,
form a peculiar, unadulterated, original nation, which is its own archetype.
Even their physical development is universally uniform.'"
Today, Herder said, "The tribes of
Germany have been degraded by mingling with others." This mingling, Herder
warned, rendered Germans "misshapen and cast down."
The
Brothers Grimm took up
Herder's call and published their wildly successful and influential Kinder und
Hausmarchen – often translated as Grimm's Fairy Tales. They claimed that their
folklore was a key to the German nation, soil, and soul. Jacob Grimm wrote that
myth "is properest to that nation with whose gods it closely
coalesces." Get in touch with Germany's folklore; get in touch with German
nature and earth, and get in touch with old, Germanic Gods.
The Grimms insisted that their folklore
had no foreign impurities. Although "combinations" caused by
"peaceful intercourse or war" might produce "gain,"
"language" did best when pure of foreign interference. The Grimms
wanted to be able to present "purely German fare"; "nothing is
as edifying or as likely to bring more joy than the products of the
Fatherland." "Long lines of Teutonic peoples" were required for
the production of the best "poesie"; "blendings with foreign
peoples" "disintegrated" poesie and drove it to "extinction."
The Grimms' nationalism sounded
neo-Pagan when they wrote, "Nations
hold fast by prescription: we shall never understand their tradition, their
superstition, unless we spread under it a bed on still heathen soil."
Moralists protested Grimm's Fairy Tales.
The tales were sadistic and violent. Heroes achieved not through Christian
virtues, but through selfish deceits and betrayals. The Grimms wrote that
Nature's and the nation's morality was best. "Nature itself is our best
witness, for she has let these flowers and leaves grow in these colors and
shapes; whoever fails to find them right for certain needs, unknown to nature,
can pass right by them, but ought not to demand that they therefore be colored
and cut in a different fashion … Everything that is natural can also be healthy
... we do not intend to praise these tales or even to defend them against
opposing views: their very existence suffices to protect them. Whatever has
succeeded in bringing so much pleasure so often, and has at the same time moved
and instructed, has its own inner
justification and must have flowed from the eternal wellspring that bedews all
life." Because they were natural and because they were German, the
Grimms' folklore was a proper guide to behavior: "we wanted ... that the
book serve as a manual of manners."
Other German cultural leaders, including
composer Richard Wagner, joined in
celebration of Germany's ancestral, pre-Christian deities. Wagner dramatized
German folklore of gods and heroes in his lengthy operas. Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche announced that
"God is dead" and harkened
back to pre-Christian, Pagan, Homeric
Greece's "aristocratic values" in opposition to Christianity's
alleged "slave morality." Nietzsche described the ubermensch,
sometimes translated as superman, who created new values after the death of
God.
In Chicago in 1924, after months of
careful planning, two young friends, Leopold and Loeb, lured an innocent
14-year-old boy, Bobby Franks, into their car. Loeb struck Franks in the head
with a chisel, and then suffocated him. The killers cited Nietzsche as
inspiration. Leopold wrote that "A superman ... is, on account of certain
superior qualities inherent in him, exempted from the ordinary laws which
govern men. He is not liable for anything he may do." Leopold and Loeb had
killed a boy simply for the fun of it, and claimed their status as Nietzschean supermen
as justification.
Herder, the Grimms, Nietzsche, etc, were
not Nazis. The Nazis, though, cherry-picked aspects of their work to support
the Nazi edifice. In 1934, Hans Dahmen published "The National Idea from
Herder to Hitler." Dahmen wrote, "From Herder to Hitler – that is the fate-laden path of the German
spirit."
Nazis made greater use of the Grimms
than of Herder. "Nazi ideologues
enshrined the Kinder- und Hausmarchen as virtually a sacred text, a special
expression of the spirit of the Volk" writes Elizabeth Dalton. Grimm's Fairy Tales were included in
Hitler Youth training. "The German author Günther
Birkenfeld saw in the fairytales the answer to 'how the German people were able to perpetrate the atrocities of Belsen
and Auschwitz.'"
"A British major, TJ Leonard, even said the fairytales had helped
Germans teach their children 'all the varieties of barbarousness,' making
it easy for them to fit into the 'role of the hangman.'" Scholar Louis L. Snyder,
who witnessed Nazism's rise, wrote that Grimm's Fairy Tales indoctrinated Germans in "respect
for the leader and the hero, veneration of courage and the military spirit,
acceptance without protest of cruelty, violence, and atrocity, fear of and
hatred for the outsider, and virulent anti-Semitism." Allies banned the Grimms after the war.
Hitler said that "Whoever wishes to understand National
Socialist Germany must know Wagner." Wagner's original manuscripts of his scores were presented to Hitler as
a fiftieth birthday gift. When the war turned against Germany, Wagner's
grandchildren begged Hitler to return the scores. Hitler clung stubbornly to
the manuscripts of his volkish hero. He took Wagner's scores with him to his
bunker. The scores were lost and are presumed destroyed.
Hitler
had himself photographed gazing at a bust of Nietzsche. "Hitler as Nobody
Knows Him," a bestselling propaganda pamphlet captioned this photo as
"The Führer before the bust of the German philosopher whose ideas have
fertilized two great popular movements: the National Socialist of Germany and
the Fascist of Italy."
Nazism adopted Nietzsche's term
"ubermensch," the superman who created new values after the death
of God. Nazis also used the mirror term "untermensch," the inferior
human who did not deserve life.
Nationalism
and neo-Paganism would combine with another cultural strand: social Darwinism. Superficially, nationalism,
neo-Paganism and social Darwinism are very different. The first two are clearly
supernatural and social Darwinism is inspired by science without reference to
gods or magic. They share three
important characteristics, though, all three of which Nazism adopted: the death
of the Judeo-Christian God, high value placed on one's own genetic kin, and a
struggle-to-the-death-based morality that exalts winners and disdains losers.
In
his 1930 book "The Myth of the Twentieth Century," Nazi theorist
Alfred Rosenberg declared
the "collapse" of all that had come before and a "new dawn"
and a "new faith" a "new light" a "new mission:"
"blood and blood, race and race, folk and folk." "That is the
task of our century; to create a new human type out of a new view of
life."
Charles Darwin published "On the
Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life"
in 1859. As Richard Dawkins said, "Although atheism might have been
logically tenable before Darwin, Darwin made it possible to be an
intellectually fulfilled atheist." Another author, Fyodor Dostoyevsky,
wrote that "If God does not exist, everything is permitted." Within a
few decades, influential authors had co-opted Darwinism and developed Social
Darwinism and its attendant phenomena, eugenics and scientific racism. God was
dead, and everything was permitted, including murder of the unfit, as long as
that everything preserved favored races in the struggle for life.
Scientific racist authors like Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard made
it very clear that the universalist values of the Judeo-Christian God were
dead. Christianity had hobbled mankind in keeping undesirables alive, Stoddard,
Grant, and others insisted. Christianity might seem to be compassionate, but it
really wasn't, because it merely extended human suffering by cultivating the
lives of inferior humans. Atheist science now cleared the path for true
progress. True progress would entail the "elimination of the unfit."
Hitler called Madison Grant's 1916 book
"The Passing of the Great Race" his "Bible." Stoddard titled
his 1922 book "The Revolt against
Civilization: The Menace of the Under Man." Under man in German is
untermensch, the mirror, inferior image of the Nietzschean ubermensch or
superman. Stoddard visited Nazi Germany in
1939-40. He witnessed a eugenics court in action. He reported that it was
"weeding out the worst strains in the Germanic stock in a scientific and
truly humanitarian way."
SS Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler
outlined the Nazi ethical system in several speeches. The quotes, below, span
the Nazi ethical spectrum:
the violent relegation to the dustbin of
any Good-Samaritan-style compassion for ethnic others,
the new understanding of ethnic others
as animals to be exploited or disease to be extirpated,
the deification of Nature,
the emphasis on struggle as a good,
the valuation of winners and the
murderous disdain for losers,
the championing of one's own ethnicity,
the finding of transcendence in
offspring and ancestors, to replace the Christian transcendence to be found in
God, heaven, hell, or the soul's immortality,
and the upholding of a genocidal killer as
society's ethical hero.
"In Poland in weather forty degrees
below zero, where we had to haul away thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds of
thousands, where we had to have the toughness – you should hear this but also
forget it again immediately – to shoot thousands of leading Poles … The proud
soldier says, 'My God, why do I have to do that, this ridiculous job here!' –
It is much easier to go into combat with a company than to suppress an
obstructive population of low cultural level, or to carry out executions, or to
haul away people, or to evict crying and hysterical women …
You have to consider the work of the S.
D. man or of the man of the Security Police as a vital part of our whole work
just like the fact that you can carry arms. You are the men to be envied
because … if a unit achieves fame …it can be decorated. It's much more
difficult in other positions… in this silent, compulsion work, this silent
activity…
We will have to deal with Christianity
in a tougher way than hitherto. We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues
that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in
every conflict. If our generation does not do it then it would I think drag on
for a long time. We must overcome it within ourselves … We shall once again
have to find a new scale of values for our people: the scale of the macrocosm
and the microcosm, the starry sky above us and the world in us, the world that
we see in the microscope.
Man is nothing special at all … He has
no idea how a fly is constructed – however unpleasant, it is a miracle – or how
a blossom is constructed. He must once again look with deep reverence into this
world. Then he will acquire the right sense of proportion about what is above
us, about how we are woven into this cycle …
Then, on a different plane, something
else must happen: we must once again be rooted in our ancestors and
grandchildren, in this eternal chain and eternal sequence … By rooting our
people in a deep ideological awareness of ancestors and grandchildren we must
once more persuade them that they must have sons … everything that we do must be justifiable vis-à-vis the clan, our
ancestors. If we do not secure this
moral foundation which is the deepest and best because the most natural, we
will not be able to overcome Christianity on this plane and create the Germanic
Reich which will be a blessing for the earth. That is our mission as a
nation on this earth. For thousands of years it has been the mission of this blond
race to rule the earth and again and again to bring it happiness and culture…
One basic principle must be the absolute
rule for the S.S. men. We must be honest, decent, loyal, and comradely to
members of our own blood and nobody else. What happens to a Russian and a Czech
does not interest me in the least. What the nations can offer in the way of
good blood of our type we will take, if necessary by kidnapping their children
and raising them here with us.
Whether
nations live in prosperity or starve to death interests me only in so far as we
need them as slaves for our culture: otherwise it is of no interest to me.
Whether ten thousand Russian females fall down from exhaustion while digging an
anti-tank ditch interests me only in so far as the anti-tank ditch for Germany
is finished. We shall
never be tough and heartless where it is not necessary, that is clear.
We, Germans, who are the only people in
the world who have a decent attitude towards animals, will also assume a decent
attitude towards these human animals. But it is a crime against our blood to
worry about them and give them ideals, thus causing our sons and grandsons to
have a more difficult time with them. When somebody comes up to me and says: 'I
cannot dig the anti-tank ditch with women and children, it is inhuman, for it
would kill them,' then I have to say: 'You are the murderer of your own blood,
because if the anti-tank ditch is not dug German soldiers will die, and they
are the sons of German mothers. They are our own blood....' Our concern, our
duty, is our people and our blood. We can be indifferent to everything else. I
wish the S.S. to adopt this attitude towards the problem of all foreign,
non-Germanic peoples, especially Russians …
We have the moral right, we had the duty
to our people to do it, to kill … we exterminated the bacillus, we don't want
to become sick and die from the same bacillus.
I will never see it happen, that even
one bit of putrefaction comes in contact with us, or takes root in us. On the
contrary, where it might try to take root, we will burn it out together. But
altogether we can say: We have carried out this most difficult task for the
love of our people. And we have taken on no defect within us, in our soul, or
in our character."
For more on Nazism and Paganism read my
review of Eric Kurlander's 2017 Yale University Press book Hitler's
Monsters here.
* NAZIS THEMSELVES REPEATEDLY AND VEHEMENTLY ESTABLISHED THAT
NAZISM WAS NOT ONLY NOT CHRISTIAN, BUT ANTI-CHRISTIAN.
I frequently stumble across photos
depicting Nazis' expressing their disdain for Catholics, as I did the other
day. Two images, above, depict Nazi Stormtroopers in Stuttgart on August 8,
1935. Their truck's sign caricatures Nazism's enemies. Of the nine images on
the truck, three are Catholics.
By
1937, 12,000 Catholic priests had been persecuted by the Nazi regime. The Dachau concentration camp
established a priests' barracks for clergy in 1940. Dachau was known as
"the largest monastery in Germany." Catholic presses were closed.
Catholic dissidents were murdered during the 1934 Night of the Long Knives. In
1935, seven hundred pastors of the Confessing Church were arrested. Catholic
schools were disbanded. During the war, almost twenty percent of Polish priests
were murdered. Above are two pictures of Polish priests who were mass murdered
in Bydgoszcz, Poland. There is one photo of Father Piotr Sosnowski before his
murder.
Nazism's long-term goal was to eliminate
Christianity (see here.)
Those wishing to read more about the
anti-Christian nature of Nazism should refer to Richard Weikart's
"Hitler's Religion" or my lengthy review of it here.
* A PERFECT STORM OF HISTORICAL CIRCUMSTANCES FACILITATED THE
NAZIS' APPLICATION OF THEIR WORLDVIEW.
Reading the history that lead up to Nazi
Germany, one reflects that it would have been almost impossible for some
cataclysm not to have taken place. Without precipitating events, Hitler would
have remained an anonymous eccentric.
Given
WW II, we tend to forget what a shattering experience WW I was. WW I was among
the deadliest events in history. Men died stupidly, fighting to gain patches of
trench-scarred earth, only to lose the same patch by nightfall. Innovations,
poison gas and airplanes, were used in warfare and shocked combatants and
civilians. Military and civilian casualties added up to 38 million.
Germany
was saddled with the punitive Versailles treaty. It saw its former despised
colony, Poland, achieve nation status, at its own expense of territory. Soviet
Russia terrified the world with advancing Communism. Christians were under
assault in Russia. Mass murder and other persecutions made Christians feel
unsafe and ready to fight a war to protect themselves. The
Great Depression hit a mere eleven years after the end of the war.
Germany's Weimar Republic was chaotic. Germans felt shamed and afraid. The
"stab in the back" conspiracy theory said that Germans didn't lose
the war on the battlefield, but through domestic betrayal by communists, Jews,
and Catholics – the "November Criminals." Hitler promised a return to
greatness. Even with all this, it was only after the Reichstag Fire that the
Nazis received a majority of the vote.
We need to heed this lesson: if you push
people too far, there is a backlash. As long as we scapegoat Christianity, we
avoid learning this important lesson.
* WHILE FIGHTING A LOSING WAR ON THREE FRONTS, NAZISM EXERTED
TREMENDOUS EFFORT TO BRAINWASH GERMANS.
Nazism exerted tremendous effort to
indoctrinate the youth, to make the youth different than their parents
vis-à-vis Jews and other untermenschen. Hitler
Youth membership was mandatory. Hitler
said, "These boys and girls enter our
organizations [at] ten … after four years of the Young Folk they go on to the
Hitler Youth, where we have them for another four years … And even if they are
still not complete National Socialists, they go to Labor Service and are
smoothed out there for another six, seven months … And whatever class
consciousness or social status might still be left … the Wehrmacht will take
care of that."
Hitler Youth were encouraged to inform
on their parents. "We were promised a reward of money if we denounced our
parents or our neighbours - what they said or did ... We were told: your real
father is the Führer, and being his children you will be the chosen ones, the
heroes of the future." Parents, for their part, noted how different their
children were becoming. "Parents ... were alarmed by the gradual
brutalisation of manners, impoverishment of vocabulary and rejection of
traditional values ... Their children
became strangers, contemptuous of monarchy or religion, and perpetually
barking and shouting like pint-sized Prussian sergeant-majors."
Alfons Heck, a former Hitler Youth
member, said, "The experience of the Hitler Youth in Nazi Germany
constitutes a massive case of child abuse. Out of millions of basically
innocent children, Hitler and his regime succeeded in creating potential
monsters. Could it happen again today? Of course it can. Children are like empty vessels."
Indoctrination worked through every
channel – visual, auditory, kinesthetic – to replace Christianity with Nazism.
The swastika, not a Eucharist, occupied the center of a monstrance (see image above).
Hitler Youth convened on Sunday mornings, making church attendance impossible.
Nazis said grace and professed a creed to Hitler. "Silent Night's"
lyrics were co-opted: "Silent night holy night. Adolf Hitler is Germany's
wealth, brings us greatness favor and health. Oh, give us Germans all
power!" Speer's cathedral of light replaced a church structure.
One of Hitler's closest allies, one of
the most powerful men in the Third Reich, was not a priest, or a general – he was
a novelist. Joseph Goebbels was at Hitler's side right up to the end, when
Goebbels committed suicide shortly after Hitler. Goebbels' job was never to
fire a gun. His job was to brainwash Germans into accepting Nazism.
Nazi
anti-Semitic propaganda was not primarily theological. It was Nazi – that is,
it was focused on race, biology, and struggle. The most notorious Nazi propaganda film, "The Eternal Jew," identifies Jews
as a non-Germanic people who, like rats, parasitize German society, and who,
like rats, must be eliminated for the greater good. There is no reflection of either concept in core Christian theology.
Jews are not a different species, and there is no moral justification for
eliminating them.
"Jud
Suss" depicts Jews as middleman minorities who mediate between a corrupt
ruler and an oppressed populace.
Jews raise taxes, for example, to strangle the citizenry and fatten the ruler.
"Jud Suss" was used before troops were sent into "aktions" against
Jews. Mind: the Nazis' single most successful propaganda film used middleman
minority justifications for genocide, not theological justifications. The Jew
in "Jud Suss" is not a deicide – he is a middleman.
"Jud Suss" was based on the bestselling
novel of the same name. A fact anyone
accusing Christianity of being the basis of Nazism should keep in mind:
"Jud Suss" was written by a Jewish author, Lion Feuchtwanger, as
a plea against anti-Semitism. Not only was Feuchtwanger a Jew, but he was a
critic and a target of Adolf Hitler! Yes,
Nazism could take a novel written by a Jew as a protest against anti-Semitism
and as an appeal for sympathy to Jews and twist it into one of the most
effective pieces of anti-Semitic propaganda ever made.
Even
all this propaganda did not adequately prepare Germans to be genocidal.
Einsatzgruppen complained
about the shootings; they were demoralizing. The men turned to drink to make the killing possible. Gas
was introduced as a way to depersonalize genocide and to assuage guilt. Even
that was a challenge – dealing with the dead bodies was also traumatic.
Sonderkommando were one solution. The condemned themselves would process the
dead bodies. These prisoners, in turn, would eventually be killed and
replacements put in place.
If
"two thousand years of hate" had prepped Germans to be genocidal
against Jews, the Nazis' exertions at indoctrination would not have been
necessary. Nazi
genocide was facilitated by Nazi decapitation of society, terrorizing of anyone
who would offer resistance, and rewards for those who cooperated. They pulled
off this social engineering in a society already traumatized by cataclysmic
war, incomprehensible defeat, international humiliation, financial
impoverishment, rampant conspiracy theories, and while facing a very real
threat: advancing Soviet Communism. By facing these facts about Nazism, we
learn what we need to forfend a repeat of such social engineering. By fobbing
Nazism off on "two thousand years of hate" we sacrifice the chance to
learn necessary lessons about evil people's manipulation.
* NAZIS WERE DIABOLICALLY CLEVER AT CARRYING OUT THEIR EVIL
GOALS.
Adolf Hitler did not announce that he
planned to round up six million Jews and murder them, and invite non-Jewish
Germans to applaud this. That would not have worked. The Nazis advanced slyly
and cruelly. They disguised their most vile crimes behind euphemisms like
"deportation to the east."
In retrospect it's easy to see that they were lying. Not so at the time (see
below about how shocked people were by Nazism).
I used to feel much more judgmental of
Germans. After campaign 2016, I understand better. Candidate Donald Trump circulated two anti-Semitic images of Hillary Clinton. He tweeted a Mussolini quote. Three times he declined to denounce endorsements from the KKK. And yet millions of Americans
voted for him, including people I liked and respected. Trump's adviser,
Kellyanne Conway, explained that voters "were being told
constantly … make this [offensive act] the deal-breaker once and for all.' … and
yet they voted the way voters have always voted: on things that affect them,
not things that offend them."
Similarly, Germans focused on Hitler as
a savior figure. A Nazi who served in the SA and the Wehrmacht once said to me,
"People have Hitler all wrong. It wasn't about hating Jews. It was about
loving Germany." Clearly, Hitler was about hating Jews, but this German, a
young man before the war, focused on what he wanted to focus on – the fantasy
of Hitler as a savior.
For decades after the war, surviving top
Nazi Albert Speer, in public and in private,
contorted more than an Olympic gymnast when
dancing around what he knew and when he knew it. Goebbels' 105-year-old
secretary, Brunhilde Pomsel says, "I know no
one ever believes us nowadays – everyone thinks we knew everything. We knew
nothing, it was all kept well secret." She believed that her friend, Eva
Lowenthal, and other Jews, had been sent to resettle the Sudetenland. In
2005, Pomsel researched Eva's fate – Eva had been murdered in Auschwitz.
In
1970, after his arrest, journalist Gitta Sereny confronted Sobibor and
Treblinka commandant Franz Stangl with his guilt. He had been in complete
denial. He said he had nothing against Jews, and that he was just doing a job. In
response to Sereny, Stangl finally said, "In reality I share the guilt." Nineteen hours later, Stangl
dropped dead of a heart attack. How could he have not known he was guilty? He
was running a death camp! Pomsel says, "the whole country was as if under a kind of a spell." If
Pomsel and Stangl are telling the truth, they were not anti-Semitic. They were
weak tools manipulated by anti-Semitic fanatics. The Nazis had expertly
manipulated an entire society.
Those aware enough to see through Nazi
lies in real time and articulate resistance were suppressed. Germans who
resisted were arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and often killed. The USHMM reports that "by
the end of July 1933, almost 27,000 people – virtually all of them political
prisoners – were incarcerated" in Nazi concentration camps. "No
one ever knows when it will be his turn to be beaten, or for what he must be
beaten" reported one 18-year-old in the Oranienburg concentration camp. "Those
who are beaten up in the camp usually do not say a word because they dare not,
but at night you can hear the groans and the sobbing." By the end of 1933,
100,000 Germans had been arrested. Literature professor Victor Klemperer wrote,
"A man's garden was dug up. There was supposed to be a machine gun in it.
But nothing was found. To squeeze a confession, they beat him. His corpse … had
boot marks on the stomach and fist-sized holes in the back. The official cause
of death? Dysentery." (Source: "Third Reich: The Rise and Fall"
documentary here.)
Nazis practiced societal decapitation, terrorism, and divide-and-conquer. Populations
were pacified with random killings. One Corporal Sommer recounted how his commander pacified Italian
villages.
"In every place we got to the order
was the same … 'Get rid of twenty so we
will have some peace and quiet here and they won't get any stupid ideas!'
Before we knew it we had offed fifty. It was easy to round them up. We just
said, come here, and got them all into the marketplace and he came along with
his machine gun and da-da-da-da … 'Excellent!' He called the Italians 'pigs.'"
* WE MUST NOT IGNORE SCHOLARSHIP TO CHASE A CHRISTOPHOBIC
AGENDA.
The
Milgram Experiment, the Stanford Prison Experiment by Philip Zimbardo, and Jane
Elliott's Blue Eyes / Brown Eyes exercise demonstrate the conditions that can
facilitate atrocity.
Each of these experiments suggest that normal people, under the right conditions,
can behave in a destructive manner toward relative strangers, without any
prompting by previous conditioning via stereotyping.
Zimbardo's prison experiment had a real
life echo in the 2004 abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American soldiers at Abu
Ghraib. Lynndie England was a West Virginia girl who dreamed of being a storm
chaser. Her appearance on the world stage as a sexual tormenter of defenseless
Iraqi prisoners so strongly paralleled the Zimbardo experiment that Zimbardo testified
in an Abu Ghraib trial. In understanding genocide, we would benefit from paying
more attention to scholars like Zimbardo.
* THAT NAZISM WAS A SHOCK SUGGESTS THAT IT WAS NOT AN
INEVITABLE CULMINATION OF PREVIOUS HISTORY.
It's a dizzying – reading memoirs
written about the period before Hitler took power. Again and again, Jews report
feeling utterly at home in Germany, feeling German and part of the nation,
report that Germany is known worldwide for its modern, tolerant, advanced
society. Leon Weliczker Wells was a Sonderkommando who testified at both the
Nuremberg and Eichmann trials. He wrote, "The belief
that German culture was superior continued even to the time when Germany
occupied Poland in 1939 … I remember when the Jews spoke among themselves
about the future under the Nazi regime: 'Under the Germans it couldn't be so
bad as the press wants us to believe because they are the leading civilized
nation.' Our main worry was that under the Russians we might be sent to
Siberia."
Sigmund
Freud was urged to leave Vienna. He replied, "The Nazis? I'm not afraid of
them." His "true enemy" was "religion, the Catholic
Church." Freud had sent fan mail to Mussolini, calling him "a hero of
culture."
There
were tens of thousands of Mischlinge in Germany, that is people of mixed German
and Jewish ancestry. Mischlinge were so well-integrated that a hundred and
fifty thousand Mischlinge served in the Wehrmacht. Each German has "his decent
Jew," Himmler said. Even Hitler, who spared the life of Eduard Bloch, a Jewish
physician who had treated his mother, Klara, for breast cancer.
The world's obliviousness to how far
Germany had strayed from its tolerant, civilized roots is nowhere as shockingly
depicted than in the Auschwitz memoir, "Five Chimneys." Author Olga Lengyel, a Catholic, reports
that as late as 1944, she chose to go to Auschwitz with her husband, who was
arrested by the Germans. Her husband could have gone alone; she volunteered to
accompany him, and her parents and her sons volunteered to accompany her.
She was so convinced of German benignity that even in Auschwitz itself, she
gave the guard information that guaranteed her son's death. Her mother and sons
were killed in the gas chambers. "I cannot acquit myself of the charge
that I am, in part, responsible for the destruction of my own parents and of my
two young sons. The world understands that I could not have known, but in my
heart the terrible feeling persists that I could have, I might have, saved
them."
Polish underground soldier Jan Karski
brought his eyewitness account of the Holocaust to Winston Churchill, Franklin
Delano Roosevelt and US Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter. Karski was met with dismissive disbelief.
Frankfurter was born and grew up in Vienna. He was the third Jew to serve on
the Supreme Court. Of Karski, he said, "I could not believe him."
If two thousand years of Christian
anti-Semitism inevitably resulted in the Holocaust, surely people as
knowledgeable as Felix Frankfurter, Olga Lengyal, and uncountable others would
have seen it coming. They didn't. That's because the Holocaust was not a
natural, inevitable result of German or Christian historical development.
* MASS ATROCITY TOOK PLACE DURING THE NAZI ERA THAT HAD NO
RELATION TO NAZISM, CHRISTIANITY, OR JEWS. WHILE THOSE MASS MURDERS WERE TAKING
PLACE, THE WORLD WAS AS IMPOTENT TO STOP THEM AS IT WAS WHEN JEWS WERE BEING
KILLED.
Some insist, "Only two thousand
years of Christian hate can explain Nazi atrocities" and "Only two
thousand years of Christian hate can explain how the world stood by and did
nothing."
The 1932-33 Holodomor in Ukraine – a famine orchestrated by Stalin – claimed
between 2.5 and 7.5 million Ukrainian lives. Most of these were Christian
peasants. The world did not intervene. Rather, prominent authors George Bernard
Shaw, Walter Duranty, and Louis Fischer denied the famine. Duranty, writing in
the New York Times, won a Pulitzer Prize for his denial.
About the Japanese 1937-38 Rape of Nanking, Iris Chang wrote,
"One historian has estimated that if the dead from Nanking were to link
hands, they would stretch from Nanking to the city of Hangchow, spanning a distance
of some two hundred miles. Their blood would weigh twelve hundred tons, and
their bodies would fill twenty-five hundred rail road cars. Stacked on top of
each other, these bodies would reach the height of a seventy-four-story
building."
Chang struggled to bring this story to
the world. "To forget a holocaust is to kill twice," she said,
quoting Elie Wiesel. The pressure of telling this story to an audience of the
deaf and amnesiac was too much for Chang. She killed herself.
During the war, the Japanese committed
war crimes that were every bit as horrific as the war crimes committed by the
Nazis. In reference to the Japanese,
Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the Simon Wiesenthal Center said, "Imagine
hundreds of Mengeles." I will not attempt to illustrate this point
with examples because the material is too disturbing. Interested parties can
research Unit 731. Warning: be
prepared for nightmares. No medieval Christian sermon played any role in
facilitating the hell on earth Buddhist and Shinto Japan created.
Until
the actual outbreak of WW II, Stalin was more murderous than Hitler.
"Indeed, it was Stalin, not Hitler, who initiated the first ethnic killing
campaigns in interwar Europe,"
writes Timothy Snyder. Stalin's campaigns were against Poles.
In Stalin's "'Polish Operation' that began in August 1937, 111,091 people
accused of espionage for Poland were shot. In all, 682,691 people were killed
during the Great Terror, to which might be added a few hundred thousand more
Soviet citizens shot in smaller actions … Nazi Germany began to kill on the
Soviet scale only after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in the summer of 1939 and
the joint German-Soviet invasion of Poland that September. About 200,000 Polish
civilians were killed between 1939 and 1941, with each regime responsible for
about half of those deaths" writes Snyder.
No medieval Christian sermon taught the
Nazis or the Soviets to murder Catholic Poles with such abandon. The world did
not intervene.
Though no group suffered as much as a
percent of population as did Jews, non-Jews
were subject to every atrocity that Nazis subjected Jews to. Non-Jews were
also exiled, tortured, subject to medical experimentation, and mass murdered. Handicapped people were the first and last
group to be mass murdered as part of a Nazi program. Soviet POWs were the first
to be murdered using Zyklon B. Poles were murdered by being rounded up and shot
by Einsatzgruppen. Romani and Sinti, aka Gypsies, lost 25% of their population.
They were and are majority Christian.
* EVEN THE MOST INFLAMMATORY ANTI-JEWISH STATEMENTS IN THE NEW
TESTAMENT ARE NOTHING LIKE NAZISM, AND THE NEW TESTAMENT'S OVERALL MESSAGE IS
ONE OF LOVE. JEWS ARE IDENTIFIED AS GOD'S CHOSEN PEOPLE AND THE SOURCE OF
MANKIND'S SALVATION. CHRISTIANS HAVE STRUGGLED FOR CENTURIES TO DEFUSE HATEFUL
INTERPRETATIONS OF SCRIPTURE.
The New Testament does contain passages
that are problematical. The worst is Matthew 25:27, "Let his blood be on
us and our children," where those calling for Jesus' death accept
responsibility for that death. Theologian Pieter van der Horst calls John 8:44 "the most
anti-Semitic verse in the New Testament." Jesus is debating with
Pharisees. The Pharisees suggest that Jesus was illegitimate – that is, a
bastard. Jesus retorts that their father is the devil.
Shocking as they are, both of these
verses are in keeping with the Bible as
a whole. The Old Testament prophets voiced murderous condemnations of Jews.
For a typical example, see Jeremiah 44, where God condemns some Jews for not
listening to him and obeying false Gods. He promises disobedient Jews
humiliating and thorough destruction.
The problem is that Christians, who
began as Jews themselves, rapidly became something other than Jews, and the
anti-Jewish passages in the New Testament took on a new meaning that they did
not have when they were written by Jews following a Jewish tradition of
self-criticism.
Anti-Jewish passages in the New
Testament must be re-interpreted, and they have been by Christian leaders for
centuries. This process begins in the New Testament itself. Matthew and Luke present genealogies that
inescapably identify Jesus as a Jew. In John, frequently called the most anti-Jewish
Gospel, Jesus unequivocally asserts that "Salvation comes from Jews"
(4:22). Jesus refers to Jews as the
children of God, and non-Jews as, metaphorically, dogs (Matthew 15:26). God loves and has a special place for
Jewish people and hatred for or violence against Jews is unacceptable (Romans
9-11). The 1566 Council of Trent rejected the deicide charge against Jews.
"Men of all ranks and conditions were gathered together against the
lord." "Our sins" crucified Christ and "guilt seems more
enormous in us than in the Jews."
Nowhere
in the New Testament are Christians commanded to hurt or kill anyone. Rather, Christians are to love their
neighbor as they love themselves, to bless and pray for even those who
persecute them. Christians accept the Jewish Bible in full as authoritative
scripture. In it, murder is a serious crime from which there is no escape, as
established in Genesis 4: 10-11. The Bible's approach to killing is utterly
opposite to the Nazi approach.
Christian anti-Judaism is not genocidal.
That difference is more than academic. Jews lived and prospered in Christian
Europe for centuries. Yes, there were
expulsions and upheavals – as there were for all populations in Europe.
For example, the original Prussians, a
Pagan, Baltic people, were eliminated by Germanic people who moved into
Prussian territory, killed or assimilated them, and took their name. In tenth
century Cordoba lived almost 14,000 Slavic slaves, many of them sex slaves or
eunuchs, marketed by Jews and sold to Muslims. The Knights Templar were crushed
through torture and murder when their international banking empire proved a
threat to royalty. Christian Constantinople was destroyed by Christian
Crusaders; its territory would eventually be lost to Islam. An estimated
million or more Irish people died during the Great Potato Famine, over a
million emigrated. Protestant England's policies contributed to the drop of the
Irish population from 8.2 to 6.5 million in ten years. Russia's nineteenth-century
elimination of the Circassians from their homeland is aptly called a genocide. During
and after WW II, millions of ethnic Poles were murdered in or exiled from the
Kresy, territory that was excised from Poland and ethnically cleansed. Jews did
participate in betraying Poles to Soviets. After WW II over twelve million
Germans were expelled from Eastern Europe.
Real
understanding of expulsions and massacres of Jews in Christian Europe comes
when we place these events in the above context. Expulsions and massacres of
any people are always the result of complex historical circumstances. We do
not, for example, seek to understand the Tokugawa shogunate's use of torture to
wipe out Christianity in seventeenth-century Japan as an expression of
"Buddhist intolerance." Rather, we look to the event's historical and
economic context.
Anyone attempting to explain away
contemporary tensions between Polish Catholics, Jews, and Muslims by invoking
the enslavement of Slavs in Muslim Spain would be dismissed as guilty of a
bigoted essentializing – that is, of positing an exploitative Jewish
"essence" that transcends the passage of time and historical
circumstance.
English Protestants and Catholic
Crusaders didn't destroy fellow Christians because of anything the Bible says.
They did so for economic and power reasons. In the same way that we must
understand economic and political context to make sense of the siege of
Constantinople in 1204, we must understand economic and political context to
understand the history of Jews in Europe, and not write off any bad thing that
happened to Jews as the inevitable result of Christian theology – for the
simple reason that it is contrary to Christian theology to kill, expel, or
massacre. If those killing and massacring are not following theological
precepts, we must seek other data to understand.
Too, hate is not the whole story.
When,
in the 11th century, Christians massacred Jews in the Rhineland, the
bishops of Mainz, Speyer, and Worms attempted to protect Jews. Popes, over the course of hundreds of
years, repeatedly condemned blood libel. In his anthology "Stranger in Our
Midst," Harold B. Segel excerpts philosemitic Polish literature stretching
across centuries. Poland invited Jews when they were expelled from other
countries. It promised, and delivered to Jews rights of self-rule and religious
freedom. Polish peasants admired and befriended Jews, as documented by scholar
Anna-Maria Orla Bukowska. Polish Catholics revered Jewish tzaddiks –
wonder-working holy men. Polish authors created Jewish heroes in seminal works.
Christian Europe produced the Rothschilds,
Moses Montefiore, Freud, Einstein, Marx, IB Singer, Helena Rubenstein, Mendelssohn.
Achievement levels are equally high in the mostly Christian United States.
There is no comparable level of acceptance and achievement to be found among
Jews in Yemen or Morocco or Ethiopia. There was something good about Christian
Europe for Jews.
Humanists and atheists in Europe also struggled
for the emancipation of all people, regardless of their ethnicity or religion.
That trend for universal emancipation and dignity was especially strong in
Germany.
Telling
a story in which all Jews do in Christian Europe is suffer, and where Jews are
the only people who suffer, where Christians only hate and hurt Jews, and no
one else, and where no Christian has any Jewish friends, and no Jew has any
Christian allies, distorts history.
Some Christians sometimes loved and protected Jews. Some Christians sometimes
hated and hurt Jews. Writing off all the hate and hurt as the fruit of
Christian theology renders the love and comradeship incomprehensible. We need
to ask, "What happened?" about both the bad times and the good times
to fully understand both.
*
THE FREQUENTLY CITED "TWO THOUSAND YEARS OF
CHRISTIAN ANTI-SEMITISM" IS A MISNOMER.
In his book "Bearing
False Witness," Rodney Stark points out that those who insist that
anti-Semitism has been temporally and geographically coterminous with
Christianity can easily be proven wrong. Anti-Jewish persecutions predate
Christianity, and Christians for many centuries were a minority sect without
the power to persecute anyone. Western
Christians did not murderously persecute Jews in any historically significant
way until the eleventh century when "the conflict with Islam boiled
over" this "changed perceptions of religious threats." When
anti-Jewish violence broke out, popes condemned it and bishops and knights
protected Jews. In short, anti-Semitism is not essential to Christianity;
rather, it is a phenomenon dependent on external factors.
* THE INSISTENCE THAT "TWO THOUSAND YEARS OF CHRISTIAN
ANTI-SEMITISM PAVED THE WAY FOR THE HOLOCAUST" IS BASED ON A COMPLETE
MISUNDERSTANDING OF STEREOTYPING, AND THIS MISUNDERSTANDING OF STEREOTYPING IS
AS THREATENING TO JEWS AND JUDAISM AS IT IS TO CHRISTIANS AND CHRISTIANITY.
Often those wishing to make the case
that Christianity is the root cause of Nazism cite hideous things that
Christians have said over the centuries about Jews.
This conclusion is based on a complete
misunderstanding of stereotyping. All
people stereotype their neighbors, and these stereotypes are often vicious.
If stereotyping were rationale or inspiration enough for genocide, we'd all be
genocidal. But we are not. Again, we must ask, what happened?
The conflation of stereotyping, a
universal human activity, with genocide or other crime is as damaging to Jews
as it is to Christians.
Jews, like everyone else, stereotype
their others of choice – non Jews. "Shiksa," a Yiddish word for a
non-Jewish woman, is variously translated as "vermin,"
"cockroach," and "object of loathing." "Goyishe kop,"
or gentile head, means stupid. "Shikker iz der Goy" conveys that
non-Jews are drunks. The Talmud depicts Jesus boiling in excrement.
In America, recent years have seen many
high profile financial crimes committed by Jews including Bernie Madoff,
Michael Milken, Ivan Boesky, Marc Rich and George Soros. In Poland, Jews like
Józef Różański, Jakub Berman and Helena Wolińska-Brus played a disproportionate
role in the Communist occupiers' defaming, torturing, and murdering of wartime
heroes like Witold Pilecki and Emil August Fieldorf.
Those wishing to exploit these crimes to
indict all Jews cite Talmudic quotes that allegedly encourage Jews to deceive and
destroy non-Jews. One such notorious quote, "The best of gentiles, kill."
I reject the arguments of those who
insist that the Talmud's teachings are necessary and sufficient motivation for
criminals. Jews have been prominent in financial crimes in recent years, and in
the Communist Party in Poland, thanks to complex historical factors. Jews have
also been prominent in philanthropy and in fighting for Poland's freedom. Non-Jews
have also committed financial crimes and most Communists in Poland were not
Jewish. The Talmud does emphasize philanthropy. The Talmud is a lengthy work
that includes universalist teachings as well as particularist ones.
Wikipedia currently (as of January 28,
2017) identifies Julius Streicher as a Roman Catholic and Piotr Smietanski as a Jew. Streicher was vehemently
anti-Catholic. This identification is false. Piotr Smietanski was a Communist
executioner. He was not Jewish. This identification is also false. Both
identifications are made, one must guess, for reasons of stereotyping and
propaganda. Smietanski executed Polish patriots on behalf of Soviet overlords –
so he must be Jewish. Streicher hated Jews, so he must be Catholic.
* THE ASSERTION THAT PRE-NAZI ANTI-JUDAISM OR ANTI-SEMITISM WAS
IDENTICAL TO NAZISM IS FALSE. WE KNOW OF PRE-NAZI ANTI-SEMITES OR ANTI-JEWISH
PERSONS WHO RESISTED THE NAZIS AT THE RISK, AND THE COST, OF THEIR LIVES.
We
know of cases where people said bad things about Jews and also resisted the
Nazis, at the risk, and the cost, of their lives. That's because saying critical things
is not the same as committing, or even supporting, genocide.
Jan Mosdorf was a member of the National
Radical Camp, an anti-Semitic movement in interwar Poland. In 1938, he publicly
declared that though he was a nationalist, he was not a Nazi. The Nazis
imprisoned him in Auschwitz. There, he organized a group to help Jews. He was
denounced and executed.
Cardinal August Hlond delivered possibly
the single most notorious anti-Jewish statement by a Prince of the Church. His
1936 pastoral letter condemned Jews for publishing pornography, practicing
usury, and dealing in prostitution. The Cahiers du Témoignage Chrétien was a French Catholic underground
publication that urged people to aid Jews and resist Germans. It quoted Pope
Pius XI who said, "spiritually, we are all Semites." This publication
relied on Hlond's eyewitness accounts of Nazi genocide of Jews in occupied
Poland. Hlond condemned the Vatican for its "silence" on what the
Nazis were doing to Poland. Himmler ordered Hlond's arrest. The Gestapo offered
him a chance for power and freedom, if only he would urge Poles to unite with
Germans in their fight against their common enemy, the Soviet Union. Hlond
declined to cooperate.
Hlond's
wartime resistance of the Nazis, at the risk of his own life, is consistent
with the entirety of his message.
Christians must "honor and love Jews as human beings and neighbors," Hlond
wrote. Hlond opposed violence against and expulsions of Jews, "I warn against
that moral stance, imported from abroad, that is basically and ruthlessly
anti-Jewish … one is forbidden to assault, beat up, maim, or slander Jews."
Anyone arguing that Hlond's 1936 letter inspired violence against Jews must
explain why his stand against violence was not adhered to by those under his
influence.
Zofia
Kossak-Szczucka was a
Polish Catholic author. She identified herself as anti-Jewish in an underground
pamphlet. She co-founded Zygota, the only group in occupied Europe devoted to
rescuing Jews from Nazism. She was arrested and sent to Auschwitz.
Henryk
Opiatowski was the Catholic priest in Bransk, Poland, in 1943. He aided Jews.
For this, Nazis dragged him out of his home in his underwear, and beat him
publicly, promising, "We will crucify you, like your Christ," before
killing him. Father
Opiatowski's village of Bransk was later pilloried in a PBS special entitled
"Shtetl" that depicted it as a typically backward, anti-Semitic
Polish town.
Maximilian
Kolbe was a Polish
priest. He oversaw many publications, some of which published anti-Jewish
material, though he himself did not author nor was he aware of that material.
His lack of awareness does not exonerate him – it was a sin of omission.
Kolbe was arrested and abused by Nazis. He
experienced firsthand how dangerous Nazis were. He was released. In spite of
his previous experience, he defied Nazi edicts and aided 2,000 Jews at his
monastery. Kolbe was arrested again and sent to Auschwitz, where he was
murdered. Auschwitz survivor Sigmund Gorson testified to Kolbe's
character.
"He knew I was a Jewish boy. That
made no difference. His heart was bigger than persons – that is, whether they
were Jewish, Catholic or whatever. He loved everyone. He dispensed love and
nothing but love. For one thing, he gave away so much of his meager rations
that to me it was a miracle he could live. Now it is easy to be nice, to be
charitable, to be humble, when times are good and peace prevails. For someone
to be as Father Kolbe was in that time and place – I can only say the way he
was is beyond words. I am a Jew by my heritage as the son of a Jewish mother,
and I am of the Jewish faith and very proud of it. And not only did I love
Maximilian Kolbe very, very much at Auschwitz, where he befriended me, but I
will love him until the last moments of my life."
* LENGTHY PERIODS OF STEREOTYPING IS NOT A NECESSARY PRECURSOR
TO GENOCIDE.
The Cambodian auto-genocide caused the
death of 25 % of Cambodia's population in four years. Cambodians murdered other
Cambodians. Cambodia was a majority Buddhist country; Cambodians wiped out
Buddhist monks and temples. This was not a stereotyping group X destroying
stereotyped group Y. This was the self tearing out its own heart. The Rwandan
genocide is said to be the quickest in history. Neighbor killed neighbor with
machetes, at the urging of radio broadcasts. No two thousand years of hate
prepared Rwandans for this hell. They created hell with stunning speed and no
rehearsal.
Scholar Christy Turner uncovered
evidence of a genocide-by-cannibalism of the Anaszi by invading Toltecs. This
genocide of one group of Native Americans by another group of Native Americans took
place long before Columbus arrived in the Americas. Turner was excoriated for
his publications. Only white Christians could do something so awful, so this
genocide never happened, critics insisted. In any case, the Toltecs were new
invaders and could not have been stereotyping the Anasazi for two thousand
previous years.
* CHRISTIANS DID STOP NAZISM.
Largely Christian troops gave their
lives to end Nazism. They were inspired by Christian ideals, such as the value
of all human life. The crosses at Normandy are one testimony to this.
Jozef and Wiktoria Ulma were a Catholic,
peasant, Polish couple. They had six children. In Jozef Ulma's Bible, the
following words are underlined in red:
"You shall love the Lord your God
with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with
all your mind, and your neighbor as yourself … But a Samaritan, as he
journeyed, came to where he was, and when he saw him, he had compassion. He
went to him and bound up his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he set him
on his own animal and brought him to an inn and took care of him."
When the Nazis arrived in Markowa, the
Ulma village, they announced that anyone who helped a Jew would be killed, as
would all family members. Jozef and Wiktoria helped Markowa's Jews. Nazis
murdered Jozef and Wiktoria Ulma and their six children. Wiktoria was pregnant
at the time; some count seven children murdered. The Jews the Ulmas helped were
also murdered.
* NON-CHRISTIANS HAVE COMMITTED CATASTROPHIC MASSACRES OF JEWS.
The three-thousand-year-old Merneptah
Stele is the first recorded written reference to Jews. The Egyptian Pharaoh
Merneptah brags, "Israel is laid waste and his seed is not." In 722
BC, Assyrians eliminated ten of the twelve tribes of Israel, giving rise to
various "Ten Lost Tribes" myths. In 70 AD, Roman Pagans drove Jews
out of Jerusalem and into diaspora, ending Temple Judaism and beginning
rabbinical Judaism, and contributed to a massive drop in the world population
of Jews, a population drop from which Jews did not recover for centuries. Israeli
demographer Sergio DellaPergola estimates that the world Jewish
population dropped by 75 % in this period. Roman Pagans renamed Judea
"Palestine" in order to erase even the memory of Jews ever having
lived there.
The stereotype that Jews faced no
discrimination in Muslim lands, but only in Christian ones, is false. Bernard
Lewis writes, "The myth was invented by Jews in 19th century Europe as a
reproach to Christians." In 1066 Muslim mobs in Grenada crucified Jewish
vizier Joseph ibn Naghrel and massacred the city's Jewish population. Beginning
in the 1940s, Muslim nations drove their Jewish populations out. An estimated
850,000 Jews were affected. The Muslim world is all but Judenrein and attacks
by Muslims on Jews make neighborhoods in France and England increasingly unsafe
for Jews. In contemporary America, the most extreme anti-Semitism comes from
the Left, which is also prominently Christophobic.
Yes, non-Christian populations can
mistreat Jews in historically significant ways.
* OUR DISCUSSION OF ANTI-SEMITISM MUST MATURE PAST
CHRISTOPHOBIC EXPLOITATION.
The
European Wars of Religion lasted between 1524 and 1648. Death
toll estimates range between six and twelve
million. The website Necrometrics
names The Thirty Years War number seventeen in its list of the Top Twenty Worst
Things People Have Done to Each Other. Herbert Langer claims that these wars
reduced Europe's population by 25%. "It took Germany almost a hundred years
to recover demographically from the war" (Source). These wars included the 1572 St. Bartholomew's Day
Massacre, in which Catholic mobs mass-murdered Protestants. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, "So many Lyonese corpses drifted
down the Rhône to Arles that, for three months, the Arlesians did not want to
drink the river water." Not all disapproved of this massacre. Spain's
Catholic monarch, Philip II , when told of the massacre, "laughed
for the only time on record."
Protestants massacred Catholics as well.
Protestant Reformer "Zwingli held that, in case of need, the massacre of
bishops and priests was a work commanded by God;" "torture [of Catholics
by Protestants] is kept up for a whole day, for a day and a night, for two days
… even also for four days … after which it begins again … There are stories
extant so horrible and revolting that no true man can hear of them without a
shudder;" "The complete extirpation of the Catholic Church, and in
fact of everything that stood in their way, was regarded by the reformers as
something entirely natural."
And Protestants warred on fellow
Protestants, "The penalties enjoined by the Town Council of Zurich [for
Anabaptists] were 'drowning, burning, or beheading,' … 'It is our will,' the
Council proclaimed, 'that wherever they be found, whether singly or in
companies, they shall be drowned to death, and that none of them shall be
spared" (Source).
Today Protestants and Catholics live side
by side. They attend each other's services and schools. They are visually
indistinguishable. They intermarry. No sane Protestant or Catholic fears being harmed
by a Protestant or a Catholic in a religious war.
No serious historian attempts to explain
the European Wars of Religion by referring to mass in Latin, or the marriage of
priests – that is, no serious historian attempts to explain this carnage using
theology. Rather, when we attempt to understand this horror, we look to the
kind of complex forces that always inspire conflict: economics and power
relations. Historian Henri Daniel-Rops writes, "Right from the beginning,
Luther's spiritual revolt had let loose material greed. The German rulers, the
Scandinavian monarchs and Henry VIII of England had all taken advantage of the
break from papal tutelage to appropriate both the wealth and the control of
their respective Churches." Will Durant quotes Philip Melanchthon,
Luther's contemporary. "They do not
care in the least about religion; they are only anxious to get dominion into
their hands, to be free from the control of bishops … Under cover of the
Gospel, the princes were only intent on the plunder of the Churches."
Protestants and Catholics murdered each
other because the powerful used theological differences to gain territory and money
and settle old scores. Henry VIII, a former "defender of the faith,"
destroyed libraries, sacked monasteries, and plunged his country into turmoil
so he could escape papal sanction, divorce Catherine of Aragon, and marry Anne
Boleyn.
We need to apply the same level of
sophistication to our discussion of European Christians' anti-Semitism.
The United States is one of the most
religious, and most Christian, countries in the world. Jews have lived in the
United States for three hundred years and have experienced minimal
discrimination compared to what they experienced in Europe during the same
period. Why did Christian Europe persecute Jews when Christian America did not
do so, to the same extent?
Edna Bonacich's Middleman Minority theory does work that the theological
explanation for Nazism does not. This theory has been expanded on by Amy Chua,
in "World On Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic
Hatred and Global Instability," and by Thomas Sowell.
Thanks to complicated historical forces
in the first century, Jews became the world's prototypical "Middleman
Minority." (For a very brief introduction to this history, see minutes two
through ten of this video.) They filled this role not just in
Christian Europe, but in Muslim lands as well. In systems so rigid they may as
well be caste systems, peasants occupy the bottom, nobles occupy the top, and
Jews mediate, financially and legally, between the two. This position offers
opportunities for wealth and power, but also resentment and murderous rage.
Jews remain distinct culturally – with separate dress, language, and foodways –
and remain easy to target when the going gets rough. When their noble
protectors are disempowered, Jews are vulnerable.
Nazism's primary victims were Jews,
Gypsies, Poles, Russians, communists, handicapped people, homosexuals,
Jehovah's Witnesses, and resisters. All of these people were victimized for the
same reasons, reasons that do not refer to Christian scripture.
Jews, Poles, and Russians were all
defined as untermenschen in Darwinian competition with Germans for territory
and resources. Jews, Catholics, Gypsies, communists and Jehovah's Witnesses
were all seen as living in Germany but owing loyalty to an international
community that superseded their loyalty to the German polity. Handicapped
people were untermenschen whose very existence threatened the master race. Jews
and Gypsies were easiest to eliminate first because there were relatively few
of them, and they were easily identifiable by a differing appearance, clothing,
or language. Divide and conquer, lies and threats facilitated their mass
murder. Nazis planned to do to the Poles what they were doing to the Jews.
There were too many Poles to eliminate right away, so Poland was merely
decapitated and virtually enslaved. Generalplan Ost called for Poland to be
cleared of ethnic Poles within ten years. Nazis began this mass murder of Slavs
during the war. Daniel Goldhagen writes that in less than eight months of 1941-42, Nazis murdered 2.8 million Soviet
POWs, mainly by starvation. The Nazis murdered more Soviet POWs than Jews
in 1941. It was only when Nazis realized that they could use Slavs
for labor to replace men fighting at the front that this slaughter was slowed. Nazis
were opportunists who constantly jiggered their killing machine depending on whom
was easiest to slaughter first. That Jewish Sonderkommando, for example, were
allowed to live longer than other Jews was no sign that Nazis didn't intend to
kill all Jews eventually. Nazis merely allowed the Sonderkommando to live
longer because it was convenient to Nazis. The same can be said of the Poles
who were allowed to live – they would be eliminated at the Nazis' convenience. In
"Jews, God, and History," Max Dimont reports that, at the end of the war,
Russian concentration camp liberators discovered that the Nazis had enough
Zyklon B stockpiled to kill twenty million people.
I wish Christianity had had the power to
elevate more people to a higher ethical standard. It didn't. Christians drove
the Atlantic Slave Trade. Christians beat their wives. Christians raped altar
boys. Christians murdered Jews. But those Christians who did murder Jews did
not do so because of Christian scripture. They did so because of other factors
we owe it to past and potentially future victims to understand. There is no
Christian scriptural command to murder Jews or anyone else. As the Ulmas knew,
as many who rest beneath Normandy's crosses knew, Christian scripture commands
us to love even the Samaritan as we love ourselves.
Some Christians did listen to Christian
scripture, and ended the Atlantic Slave Trade, lead the Suffrage movement,
publicized the sex abuse crisis, rescued Jews and fought and died to defeat
Nazism. Those Christians, and the scripture that inspired them, deserve nothing
less than the truth.
Thank you once again for your brilliant and thorough analysis! We are as a family reading through your letters in conversation with James Sharp and learning a lot. You are an exceptional writer and thinker and as always we send you love, prayers, and support for your uniquely valuable work. We'd also love to be in touch with you; we're at sandyld@gmail.com. Blessings, Sandra Lee
ReplyDelete