In "The Afterlife of Billy Fingers" Annie
Kagan, a Manhattan chiropractor and songwriter, claims that her dead brother,
William Cohen, a 62 year old recovering heroin addict and ex-con who was killed
in a drunken car accident, explains the mysteries of the universe.
Kagan claims that Billy, as she calls her late brother,
provided proof to her that his presence was real. For example, Billy
communicates cryptic information to Kagan like "Give Tex a coin" and
"There is no sunshine without the sun" and "Take Bach flower
remedies." Later, Kagan claims, these cryptic sentences came to have great
meaning. This meaning convinced Kagan that she wasn't merely imagining that her
dead brother was speaking to her; he really was.
If these incidences are genuine, and if indeed the entire
point of "The Afterlife of Billy Fingers" is, as Kagan claims, to aid
humanity, then Kagan should be able to do for the general public what she did
for those close to her. Kagan and Billy should be able to produce messages that
later pan out as true. So far, though, Kagan and Billy have not done this. That
being the case, Kagan's claim remains completely implausible.
The reader is left asking whether Kagan simply imagined
Billy's monologues, or if Kagan is a manipulator exploiting human grief and
fear to make money and achieve guru status.
Kagan describes her own life in bare bones detail. There
is little description or depth. She mentions that she is separated from her
husband but that they are still in contact. No details are provided about
either the separation or the continued contact. She lives in a beach house,
which sounds lovely and I would have liked vivid details to help me see her
home and the nearby water. There are none.
I don't believe that ghosts can dictate multiple
paragraphs of prose, including semi-colons, brackets, and no misunderstood
vocabulary words. I have transcribed interviews with living informants, and
transcription is a demanding, time-consuming chore. I often have to rewind
recorded interviews several times before I can be sure that I am getting words down
correctly. Kagan doesn't seem to have this concern. Billy apparently speaks
with supernatural precision. Kagan never needs to ask, "Did you mean
'blue' as in the color or 'blew' as in the past tense of 'blow'"? This is
the kind of question that transcribers must often ask.
I also did not find Billy believable as a character. The
most genuine and raw truth Kagan reveals in her book is the agony of a younger
sister who was a loved and good child who lost her beloved older brother to
addiction and dysfunction. Annie and Billy's parents were open in their
preference for her, not him. Billy behaved badly toward Annie. "I was your
own personal James Dean…I ignored you." Kagan tried to save Billy, and
failed. Kagan does not write a memoir spelling out the day-to-day hurts of
family dysfunction. Rather, she sketches out her history with Billy quickly,
and devotes the bulk of the book to his alleged cosmic revelations.
Billy doesn't read to me as a believable sexagenarian
heroin addict and alcoholic who has achieved moksha – transcendence. He reads like
the creation of a broken-hearted sister finding slim comfort in the kind of shallow,
muddled New Age ideals one could pick up by browsing the items near the cashier
while waiting in line to check out of a store selling crystals and patchouli
incense.
The bulk of Billy's verbiage is directed to Kagan and
their bruised and bruising relationship. She worshipped and tried to save him;
he resented her, ignored her, and let her down. Suddenly he's in heaven and
she's all he's got time for. There are passages that read almost as incestuous.
Billy refers to Kagan as "my darling." "Who but you could I tell
my secrets to, my darling?" I believe all this as Kagan working out her
issues.
Finally I don't believe that Billy is the disembodied
voice of William Cohen returning to educate humanity because the cosmic secrets
Billy "reveals" are secondhand and shallow, example, "Pain is
just part of the human experience…our lives are temporary" Also: there is
no such thing as good or bad and you have everything you need.
When Billy wants to communicate how important something
is, he describes it as physically large. For example one afterlife entity is
important because it is bigger than the sun. Size is a child's way of
understanding importance. Billy's visions are earthbound. He describes his own
afterlife as floating around in space past stars and planets, "I'm
drifting weightlessly through space with these gorgeous stars and moons and
galaxies twinkling all around me." In heaven, people wear robes, and they
are better looking "than the best looking actor."
Billy encounters his deceased wife, a gorgeous, Swedish,
blonde Vegas showgirl, and she is still gorgeous, Swedish, and blonde, and she
puts on a cootchie dance for him, but she does it in the form of sexy planets.
Eventually Billy dissolves into oneness, a Hindu idea. In
fact Kagan uses a Sanskrit term, "Ishvara," to talk about one of the
divine entities Billy encounters. Kagan decides that she and Billy descend from
the Lohani, a Pashtun tribe. Kagan has studied Eastern religions and it's easy
to see where she picked up these theological trinkets.
I'm guessing that Kagan and her brother are of Jewish
descent. One of the saddest aspects of "Billy Fingers" is that in
imagining her afterlife and answers to the cosmic questions, Kagan has no use
for Judaism whatsoever. Her text is reflective of Jewbu, those modern Jews who
have traded their ancestral riches for a vitiated and commodified version of
Buddhism and Hinduism.
Billy introduces Kagan to Lena Olin, the movie star. He
never inspires her to perform a kindness for another person for which there is
no payoff. He does warn Kagan's friend Tex about her drinking, but the point of
that episode was to prove that Billy knew things he could not know if he were
not a supernatural entity. Kagan does not record playing any role in Tex's
recovery. The lack of earthbound service in Billy's heaven is not very deep.
The first half of the book is very normal. But the ending seems to be a fiction! That where my doubt begins.
ReplyDeleteAn interesting comment
ReplyDeleteHard to find "negative" reviews or comments about this book. Since this whole entry is somewhat recent, has not been "scrubbed out" yet? I have to say that this poster's comments come closest to my general inability to believe this book. It just got worse and worse especially toward the end with it's Eastern Mysticism. I kept waiting for some feeling that this all really happened and not just completely made up by the author, but that never came. Overall, not very inspiring.
ReplyDeleteI agree. I was sent this book by a lovley friend who believes every word and was keen to share its insights. I will not disappoint her but I think the book is shallow and full of quasi mystical mumbo jumbo. If the author is self deluding and is imaganing it all but genuine in her belief I can forgive her, but if she is deliberately lying then this is unforgiveable.
ReplyDeleteI found this book to be unbelievable and nonsense. The author is either delusional or very cunning.
ReplyDeletevisit near-death.com there are sort story about thousands NDE .
ReplyDeleteJust finished and agree that the first part was intriguing but by the end it felt like fantasy. Just too elaborate and seems like she needed a storybook ending and she was getting caught up in her own fantasy.
ReplyDeleteI bought this book while i was struggling with the grieving process, I found the beginning quite believable, somewhat hopeful even, but as i was nearing the end i could only presume that what ever fraction of insight she may have had into the after death experience of her brother, was completely taken over by self indulgent creativity. if this book was to enlighten you and give you a less fearful view of death then for me i will say, i never had a fear of dying until i read the last few chapters. i guess none of us will know the truth till our time comes,. if she has lied, then i hope she will be thoroughly embarrassed in the afterlife.
ReplyDeleteDefinitely fiction. Her brother is at the hospital, totally drunk, throws a chair, runs out onto the highway in front of a car which kills him. She claims the driver's insurance company sent her a check for $10,000. That would never happen. There is no liability on the driver whatsoever. The insurance company would have paid her nothing.
ReplyDeleteI have read channeled texts, NDE accounts, and various related materials, and this is the first book in this genre I have read and felt like it was a complete fraud. It's sad, and having heard the author speak on AfterlifeTV, I get the sense this book was first induced by a depressive psychotic state, and later completed and edited through her cultural-religious hodge-podge fantasizing about her brother. It is sad and misleading, and I feel like I ended the book feeling sad. Sad that people might read this and take no accountability for their lives or the higher purpose of serving others.
ReplyDeleteI can only agree.
Delete