Friday, November 21, 2025

Nuremberg 2025 movie review

 


Nuremberg 2025

A good movie for grownups about important historical events

Nuremberg is a 2025 historical drama written, directed, and co-produced by James Vanderbilt. Nuremberg is a misnomer; the film is not an exhaustive treatment of the thirteen trials of Nazi war criminals that took place in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949. A more accurate title for the film would be Five Men at Nuremberg, those five men being SCOTUS Justice Robert H. Jackson (Michael Shannon), psychiatrist Dr. Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek), Hermann Goering (Russell Crowe), Sergeant Howard Triest (Leo Woodall), and Colonel Burton C. Andrus (John Slattery). Jackson played a key role in initiating the Nuremberg trials. Goering was a top Nazi defendant. Kelley was a thirty-two-year-old Army psychiatrist and lieutenant colonel tasked with assessing the Nazi defendants' mental fitness to stand trial. Triest was a US Army interpreter, and Andrus was the commandant of the Nuremberg prison. Richard E. Grant stars as British prosecutor Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe, and Colin Hanks plays a US Army psychologist, Dr. Gustave Gilbert. Nuremberg is roughly two and a half hours long. Nuremberg opened in the US on November 7, 2025.

Monday, November 10, 2025

"After the Hunt" "Blue Moon" and "Good Boy" Movie reviews

 



After the Hunt, Good Boy, and Blue Moon

After the Hunt is a 2025 psychological thriller. Luca Guadagnino directs. His previous films include Call Me By Your Name and Queer. The title After the Hunt is an allusion to a quote attributed to Otto von Bismarck. "People never lie so much as before an election, during a war, or after the hunt." Nora Garrett, a first-time screenwriter, wrote the screenplay in a workshop. Garrett was intrigued by the disconnect between a person's interior life and the persona that one must present in order to be successful. The main character, Alma, a Yale professor pursuing tenure, has "has spent her whole life cordoning off pieces of herself in order to reach this apex … as soon as she's there … circumstances … occur that would make it so that she could no longer successfully keep those other parts of her away from the identity that she projects out into the world."

Friday, October 24, 2025

World Enemy No. 1 by Jochen Hellbeck Book Review

 


World Enemy No. 1: Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and the Fate of the Jews

 

A new book moves the center World War II history eastward

 

World Enemy No. 1: Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, and the Fate of the Jews is a new book that offers a daring interpretation of World War II. Author Jochen Hellbeck is Distinguished Professor of History at Rutgers University. German-born Hellbeck's previous works include Stalingrad: The City that Defeated the Third Reich, and Revolution on My Mind: Writing a Diary Under Stalin. Hellbeck's father, a 17-year-old draftee, fought briefly for Nazi Germany, before being injured on the Eastern Front. His maternal grandfather ran a factory that used Russian forced laborers. Penguin Press will release World Enemy No. 1 in the US on October 21, 2025. It is 560 pages, inclusive of black-and-white illustrations, maps, a bibliography, and an index.

Sunday, October 19, 2025

Birthday 2025




Birthday 2025 / Three stories about friends

 

Years ago, I had a friend. "Audrey." She was beautiful and rich. I loved her.

 

She invited me into intimacy. At least I thought she did. She said the kinds of things to me that I would not say to another person. She said very frank, unflattering things about her children. Her husband. Her lovers. Her parents. Herself. Her own medical history. I thought, wow, we are really friends.

 

I confided in her, too.

 

I clearly remember one day, many years ago. It was a bright, sunny, unusually warm, October day. I was standing by my window, and I was crying.

 

It was my birthday.

 

I'm used to spending my birthday alone.

 

But this year, I thought I had a friend. Her. I was so foolish. All week before my birthday, as I reached into my mailbox, I kept anticipating feeling the card that I would receive from Audrey. I waited for the phone call. The plan of what we'd do.

 

Nothing.

 

When she had confided in me, I had confided in her. My birthday is hard for me, for reasons I don't need to go into here. Just one of the reasons is that it is the anniversary of the death of someone special to me – special to many people. He was killed in a car accident. He was not the driver. He was beautiful and young. I was the last person in the family to see him alive. I remember him coming down the stairs, pausing, right across from me, at the kitchen sink to take a drink of water. I admired his back. He was wearing a fine shirt, a date-night shirt. He turned and walked out the back door. For years I dreamt that at that moment, I jumped up, ran to the back door, grabbed the handle he was letting go of, and stopped him, and said, "Don't go."

 

But I didn't do that. He did go. And he never came back.

 

Well, there's that. And my birthday is hard for me for other reasons, as well.

 

So, yeah. When this beautiful, rich woman convinced me that I had a friend, I confided in her about this, and I assumed that she'd get it, and at least send me a card. And so I stood by the window on an unusually warm October day and cried.

 

I never want to feel that way again.

 

After a while, I think she got bored with me, and she ghosted me. Audrey won't ever make me feel that way again. Or maybe we'll run into each other and I'll be the proverbial Charlie Brown with the football all over again.

 

***

 

Here's another story about friends.

 

I used to phone S. regularly. I have phone phobia so that I used to call him so often is testimony to how comfortable I felt with S. Once I phoned him on Thanksgiving. His wife answered the phone. She said that S had gone for a walk by himself. She said that Thanksgiving was always a hard day for him. He had grown up in an abusive home, and Thanksgiving brought back memories, and drove him into a funk. So he was off by himself, trodding the hilltops. Something about how M described her husband's solitary trek made it all sound so Byronic. I immediately imagined a woolen cape flapping behind him against the storm-lashed sky, as he paced the moors, alone with his grief, except of course for his trusty Irish wolfhound, named Pilot, or Hound of the Baskervilles, or something.

 

This all happened over thirty years ago.

 

To this day, I am still super careful around S on Thanksgiving. It's a hard day for him. I want, at the very least, not to make it worse for him. He and I are no longer close enough for me to step up and address all this directly, to try to offer him TLC. But in my heart, I do. I think of S every Thanksgiving. I send him silent vibes of TLC. Because I care about him. Because it's a hard day for him. Because someone told me once, one time, that Thanksgiving is a hard day for S, and I never forgot. I penciled it in to my internal date book.

 

I did this because I care about S a great deal.

 

***

 

I know that some people erect unbreachable barriers around friendship. You don't support Trump? Blocked and unfriended. BTDT, many, many times. You support Israel / You are poor / You are black / You aren't cool. We can't be friends.

 

I don't do that.

 

I’m not saying, here, that if someone doesn't send me a birthday card that I would cut them off as a friend.

 

I'm saying that when Audrey didn't send me a birthday card that year, I recognized that she and I were not friends.

 

***

 

I never thought I'd live this long. That's part of what happens when your brother dies young on your birthday. The last line of his obituary was, "The man lived in this area all his life." I'd show them, the bastards that cheated us again and again. I'd travel. I'd see the world. I'd do risky things. Live fast, play hard, die young, leave a good looking corpse. That last is no longer an option for me.

 

When Antoinette was sick, I asked God to take me instead of her. She had so much to live for. Husband. Children. A home. Retirement benefits. Me? None of that. God didn't listen. The bastard.

 

So here I am, it's 2025, and the hard day is coming around again.

 

***

 

Through Facebook, I have reconnected with a kid I used to know in our small hometown. She has matured into a very kind woman. We don't talk at all. She never comments on my posts and I just generally "like" hers. But she is kind. Big heart. She sent me a card. I was so touched.

 

Earlier this year, I was lucky enough to spend two days at St. Mary's by the Sea, a blessed refuge for women dealing with cancer. To my great surprise, they sent me a hand-written birthday card! I don't even remember telling them it was my birthday.

 

Almost forty years ago, in Poland, I met one of the nicest people I've ever met in my life. T. T and I were constantly together. We traveled to Bialystok together, in a fun but unsuccessful effort to see if we could discover anything about my family, which was from a nameless village nearby. We saw European buffalo together; we met survivors of Nazi slave labor programs, a peasant couple who put us up. After their exploitation in Poland was over, they walked back to Poland, barefoot. God bless those two people! T and I got on the wrong train together. We were together on Dyngus, and one of us got drenched. T met the love of her life, as I looked on. The only creatures I've ever met that are more adorable than T are puppies and kittens.

 

But time marches on. We haven't seen each other in years and we haven't kept up. But she sent me a birthday card this year. That meant so much.

 

Another wonderful woman says she sent me a birthday card. I never got it, but I'm touched that she sent me a screencap of the card.

 

***

 

And then there's this. Someone, who would like to remain anonymous, did an amazing thing. X looked up where my brother, father, and mother – they died in that order – are buried, all in the same grave. I was here for all the deaths, and two of the internments, but I wasn't really paying attention to the location. Feh. Someone could pick me up today, drive me to my next doctor's appointment, and I would have no idea where I am. If someone else is driving – even if I'm driving – I'm not spatially oriented.

 

I remember green grass, and trees. And that's it.

 

And then X offered to take me there, on my birthday, the fiftieth anniversary of Phil's death.

 

Okay, I said.

 

Problem: A nor'easter was due to arrive on my birthday. So we went the day before.

 

I've never visited the grave of a loved one in the US. In Slovakia, once, I visited Uncle John's grave. That's it.

 

I like walking through cemeteries, but other people's cemeteries. I like them for the grass, the quiet, and the statuary, not for any connection. I have willed my own body to science. Once the spirit leaves the body, that's it. The physical remains are no more alive than the dead skin, loose hair, shed blood, exhaled breath, clipped nails, and other unmentionable stuff that our bodies discard daily. At least that's what I think.

 

The sky was gray and cloudy. There was some drizzle.

 

I noticed immediately that the cemetery where my family members are buried is for poor people. All the markers are flat, at most simply adorned stones flush with the surface of the earth. The cemetery is not well maintained. The ground is uneven and many stones tilted or sank. These stones, including my family members' stones, will soon be swallowed up by earth and time. Maybe this will become, like the rest of New Jersey, a strip mall.

 

We had to walk around because we didn't know the exact location. This is a Catholic cemetery and I read many Polish, Italian, and Irish names. And then I read "Goska."

 

My mother's name isn't even on the stone. There really isn't room. Just my brother and my dad. Birth year, death year, not the exact dates, dates I know all too well. No quotes. No carvings. No memories.

 

I called to X. X, who was conducting a search in a different section, approached.

 

I don't know why I've lived this long. It all seems pretty pointless. And it ends, at least for these three members of my family, like this. I'm guessing that no one else has ever visited their graves. Maybe Antoinette? I can't ask her.

 

What's the point?

 

I stood there, on the uneven ground, under the drizzle, staring at the stone beneath me. I didn't feel anything special.

 

I talk to my father regularly. He was a terrific driver. When I have to merge onto a busy highway, I ask him, out loud, for help.

 

I try not to think about Phil too much, because when I do, I cry. Just once a year, on my birthday.

 

My mother … every time I look in the mirror. Bake. Clean. Wish she had left some of her writing with us. She was so damn talented. The stories she could tell.

 

But this stone, and the bones and ashes – my mother, the latecomer, had to be cremated to fit – no, none spoke to me.

 

X, not I, had purchased red carnations. X had no way of knowing that that's a very Polish flower. I placed the red carnations on the stone.

 

X and I moved on.

 

X bought me pizza. And X brought me flowers.

 

The next day, my actual birthday, I read the latest Nazi book, and worked on a review of it, and ate leftover pizza. And I did not cry.

 

 


 

Friday, October 10, 2025

One Battle after Another Movie Review

Is it just me? Is everyone else in on the joke? Am I the only one who has no idea what the punch line is and when it's our cue to laugh? Has everyone but me been issued the secret decoder ring that makes sense of all this? Am I too sensitive? Too Catholic? Too old? Too grounded in objective reality? Or is it drugs? Some audience members, in a movie theater, receive 3-D glasses. Do some viewers receive a magic mushroom concoction that renders schlock beatific?

That's what I was thinking as I sat in my local multiplex showing the new film One Battle after Another. Critics tout it as a "masterpiece." Rotten Tomatoes reports that One Battle after Another has a 96% positive score. The National Public Radio program, Pop Culture Happy Hour, called One Battle after Another "awe-inspiring," "eye-poppingly beautiful," "really, really fun," "a masterclass," "firing on all cylinders," full of "painterly compositions." The crew at the Next Best Picture podcast devoted four hours – four hours! – to slathering praise on the film. To these young guys, One Battle after Another is one of the greatest films ever made. In the New York Times, Michelle Goldberg crowns One Battle after Another an "anti-fascist film."

Is it just me?

Saturday, September 27, 2025

NPR and Teen Pregnancy; Important Truths Left Unsaid


 

National Public Radio, Christianity, and Teen Pregnancy
Important truths left unsaid

 

I used to be a leftist. Back then, I was immersed in a worldview. I believed that we were right and they were wrong. Every now and then, though, I would experience cognitive dissonance. I might be reading an article in the New York Times, listening to a story on National Public Radio, or conversing with a fellow leftist. I would enter these exchanges feeling that we – I and the media source or my interlocutor and I – were on the correct side of things, and that we stood against all that was unholy and we would correct error with our righteousness.

 

But then I would hear something that would get me thinking. These thoughts would always be blurry; I unconsciously pressured myself not to pursue these thoughts to their logical conclusion, so they remained inchoate. I pressured myself because I did not want to contradict people who were smarter than I was. I had facts at hand to support a left-wing point of view. I did not have facts at hand to support a conservative point of view. And, I knew, even if unconsciously, that if I went too far in my transgressive thought patterns, I would be thinking and eventually saying things that I would be punished for. My interlocuter might mock my stupidity, and my missing the obvious flaw in my thoughts. Or I might upset someone. Or I might lose a friend.

Friday, September 12, 2025

What about the Bodies by Ken Jaworowski. Book Review.

 


Atlantic Crime publishers released What about the Bodies by Ken Jaworowski on September 2, 2025. The author is an ex-boxer and New York Times editor. Jaworowski has been nominated for an Edgar Award for mystery fiction. Bodies is a 288-page, noirish thriller set in contemporary rust-belt Pennsylvania. What about the Bodies has been rapturously reviewed by bestselling thriller authors Dean Koontz, Alex Finlay, and Lisa Scottoline, among others.
 
What about the Bodies is one of the best-written books I've ever read. As I was reading, I kept waiting for Jaworowski to misstep. He never did. Jaworowski knows how to craft a sentence, what punctuation is and how to use it, and how to choose the right words and put them in the right order. He knows how to juggle the big picture so that each sentence works towards the larger structure and the final payoff. Characters are vivid; you know them. You'd recognize them on the street. Multiple chapter-end cliffhangers work like the dips and rises on a roller coaster ride. I had no idea how this book would end until the last page. As befits a noir thriller, there is brutality here, and sadism, and a touch of gore. But there is also real heart. Hearts that break, hearts that promise to heal, hearts that silently and invisibly endure. There is heroic self-sacrifice. There is also, to my great surprise, humor, and boy-oh-boy are those laughs earned. Jaworowski has said, "I hope I wrote a fast-paced thriller. I hope I wrote something entertaining and exciting." Mission accomplished. "But," he added, "I hope you can also do that and throw in a couple of questions about life and about what we think and about who we are." Mission accomplished twice over.

Friday, September 5, 2025

Fulton J. Sheen and the American Catholic Church


 

Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen: Convert Maker by Cheryl C.D. Hughes
A new book brings attention to a celebrity clergyman

A few years ago, YouTube recommended to me a sixty-year-old, black-and-white video. The video featured a Catholic bishop, in full regalia: cape; zucchetto, or skullcap; wide, silk fascia, or waistband; and a large pectoral cross. The bishop paced in front of a minimalist set: a blackboard, a bookcase, a statue of Mary, a cross. The man gazed into the camera, and spoke. He used no notes. His speech was fluid and dynamic. And that's all that happened, for the twenty-five-minute length of the broadcast.

I had initially hesitated to click on this link. Few people would feel compelled to devote time to such an old and unadorned video. I was curious, though. I vaguely remembered hearing about an old-time TV star named Bishop Fulton J. Sheen, how he had higher ratings than superstar comic Milton Berle. He was nominated for three Emmys, and won one, for "Most Outstanding Television Personality." So I stopped what I was doing, and watched the Sheen video.

Sheen had crazy eyes. Intense, staring right into you. Those eyes announced that he was in touch with something beyond this earth. It's a good thing he became a priest because people who burn as brightly as Sheen did, if they go down the wrong path, can do a lot of damage. Sheen poured himself into the camera. Watching this old video of a man who died in 1979 felt almost uncomfortably intimate.

Saturday, August 30, 2025

Eddington 2025: Masterpiece or Mess?

 


Eddington 2025

Ari Aster's COVID-19-and-BLM-themed film is either a masterpiece or a mess

Ari Aster is a 39-year-old American director, screenwriter, and producer. He was born in New York City. His poet mother and jazz musician father moved to England for a while, and then, when Aster was ten, the family moved to New Mexico. Aster has described his childhood self as a fat kid with a crippling stutter who was alienated from others, kicked out of prep school, and obsessed with horror films. "I've wanted to make my New Mexico movie since I was a kid," he says. In a YouTube video, Aster jokes about being "in the closet." When discussing a relationship, he refers to his significant other as "they" rather than "he" or "she." I have found no conclusive information about whether or not Aster is gay. Aster appears, in interviews, as a pale, slight, bespectacled, articulate, movie-obsessed nebbish.

His 2018 horror film Hereditary made a big splash. On July 18, 2025, Aster released Eddington, a "neo-Western." Eddington addresses COVID-19, Black Lives Matter, incest, prejudice against Native Americans, and societal breakdown caused by excessive internet use. Some hail Eddington as a "masterpiece." Plenty of other critics, both professional and amateur, argue that in Eddington, Aster bit off more than he could chew. The film never gels, they say, and the last act descends into violent chaos.

Wednesday, August 13, 2025

SEEC Shroud of Turin International Conference and Symposium: Scholars and seekers explore new research

 

SEEC Shroud of Turin International Conference and Symposium

Scholars and seekers explore new research

I recently had the great good fortune to attend the SEEC Shroud of Turin International Conference and Symposium in Florissant, roughly twenty miles northwest of St. Louis, Missouri. This conference was held between July 30 and August 3, 2025 on the 284 acres of the Augustine Institute, a Catholic graduate school. The campus includes lush woods, prairie restoration, walking paths to the Missouri River, and a two-story glass-walled dining room offering treetop views. Conference papers were presented by forty-nine speakers from at least seven nations with degrees from a variety of disciplines, including physics, chemistry, law, history, theology, medicine, mathematical modeling, crime lab analysis, and mechanical, electrical, and chemical engineering.

The Shroud of Turin is an approximately fourteen-feet by three-feet piece of linen cloth that bears an image of a man crucified as Jesus was, as described in the Gospels. Image features include puncture wounds on the head, where a crown of thorns might have penetrated the scalp, a side wound consistent with the size and shape of a Roman lance, beard-plucking, facial injury, and scourge marks. Some believe that the Shroud of Turin served as the burial cloth of Jesus Christ. Others insist that the Shroud is a reprehensible hoax. Controversy surrounds the Shroud, often described as the single most studied artifact in history.

Sunday, July 20, 2025

Mamdani, Trotsky, and Stalin

 


Bronshtein in the Bronx and Koba the Dread; Laughter and the Twenty Million

Trotsky, Stalin, and Zohran Mamdani

On June 24, 2025, Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old state assemblyman, won the primary to be the Democratic Party's nominee for New York City mayor. Mamdani's mother is Indian-born Mira Nair, a filmmaker nominated for an Academy Award and a BAFTA, and recipient of a Golden Lion. His father Mahmood Mamdani was also born in India. He occupies an endowed chair at Ivy League Columbia University. The Herbert Lehman Professor of Government Chair is named for the son of one of the Jewish Lehman Brothers. The New York Post reports that Columbia professors in Mamdani's class are paid "an average of $308,000 a year." Mahmood Mamdani has been accused of antisemitism. Mira Nair has attempted to get Gal Gadot, a Jewish actress, banned from the Oscars.

Zohran Mamdani is a Twelver Shia, an apocalyptic sect implicated in Iran's push for nuclear weapons. He has professed "love" for jihadi terrorists. He supports the anti-Israel BDS movement. When asked about the phrase "Globalize the intifada," he said that that phrase expresses support for "equality," "human rights," and "equal rights." Bret Stephens corrects Mamdani; "globalize the intifada" means murdering Jews. When Mamdani campaigns in mosques, he is met with cries of "Takbir" and "Allahu akbar." He tells his mosque audiences that Israelis murdered an innocent little Muslim girl named Fatima. Why bring up Fatima Abdullah in the New York City mayoral campaign? Mamdani mentions Fatima to reinforce his portrait of Muslims-as-victims of American Islamophobia and evil Israel. Mamdani self-identifies as Muslims' avenger. "We have a million Muslims in this city. This is is our chance … an opportunity to vote for one of us," he says to mosque audiences. Mamdani does not encourage mosque audiences to vote for the best mayor for New York City. He encourages mosque audiences to vote for tribal power and revenge.

Mamdani also identifies as a socialist. He wants free buses, free childcare, government-controlled rent prices, and government-run grocery stores that sell food at government-set prices, prices that would undercut privately-run stores. He wants to "win socialism," "raise class consciousness," and he also wants to raise property taxes on "whiter neighborhoods." He "firmly believes in" "seizing the means of production." He wants to devote tens of millions of dollars to transgender drugs and surgeries.

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Materialists 2025 Review

Materialists 2025

What does a new film tell us about relationships?

Materialists is a 2025 romantic comedy. It was written and directed by Celine Song. Chris Evans (Captain America), Dakota Johnson (Fifty Shades of Grey), and Pedro Pascal (The Last of Us) are the film's A-list stars. Materialists was released on June 13, 2025. The film enjoys an 81% positive score from professional reviewers at review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes. Amateur reviews are less enthusiastic; they average an only 67% positive score. Materialists has made $35,848,149 against its production budget of $20 million. The film is a "surprise box office success" for its relatively new, small, and edgy distributor, A24 Films.

I loved Materialists. I loved the warm glow of the 35 mm film stock. I loved the gorgeous cast. I loved the few laugh-out-loud funny scenes – I have lived in that same apartment and had those same roommates. I loved the film's attempt to engage big ideas. But the movie isn't for everybody.

Materialists has received a great deal of attention from professional and amateur commentators. Materialists is not just a romantic comedy; it's an essay addressing real-life romance as well as the romantic comedy genre. That being the case, it's a good idea to talk a bit about the romantic comedy genre before talking about the film itself.

Wednesday, June 4, 2025

David Horowitz In Memoriam

 


David Horowitz
In Memoriam

 

In the late 1980s and early 90s, I lived in the People's Republic of Berkeley. Berkeley was one of the forces that made me the person I am today. UC grad school was permission I had been hungering for my entire life, without realizing it. Yes, it is okay to spend an entire day reading, writing, asking questions, and saying things that you weren't sure anyone had ever said. I loved being around intellectually alive people 24/7. I met Annapurna summiteer Arlene Blum (I felt small), Salman Rushdie (super charming), Czeslaw Milosz (rude), Gloria Steinem (kind), Shelby Steele (aloof), Peter O'Toole (indulgent but world-weary smile), and Frank Langella (sooo hot). Berkeley, in those days, was all about healing, and I had alotta wounds to heal. Berkeley's Twelve Step meetings were among the most important religious experiences I've ever had.

 

The San Francisco Mime Troupe's free outdoor plays inspired me. One performance managed to turn Liberty Leading the People, from the Delcroix painting, into a character. I get chills just thinking about it. I felt, "Wow, I have found my tribe. We are going to usher in a better world!" In the cavernous, 1,466-seat UC Theater, I watched all five hours of the Samurai Trilogy in a packed house of whooping and cheering fans. Though I'm from Jersey, where excellent pizza is as the air we breathe, I must salute Zachary's deep dish spinach and mushroom pie. I danced off the calories at Ashkenaz, a warm and welcoming nightclub constructed to resemble an eastern European synagogue.  

Friday, May 23, 2025

Thunderbolts* Review: A Superhero movie even Martin Scorsese Might Love

 


Thunderbolts*

A Marvel movie even Martin Scorsese might love

 

On May 2, 2025, Marvel Studios and Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures released Thunderbolts*. Thunderbolts* is a superhero movie advertised as "Pure cinema," featuring "Not heroes. Not super. Not giving up." In Thunderbolts*, a ragtag group of flawed characters cooperate, in spite of their self-loathing and mutual antipathy. They dismantle a deadly secret program, save Manhattan from Bob, a rampaging monster, and help Bob defeat his own demons. They thus redeem themselves.

 

Internet scuttlebutt insisted that Thunderbolts* addresses important issues in today's society through real characters that develop through real changes, and that audiences were actually tearing up.

 

This time fandom did not over hype. Not only did the characters in Thunderbolts* change. I changed. I am now willing to give Marvel movies another chance.

Friday, May 16, 2025

At Home with the Holocaust by Lucas F. W. Wilson. Book Review

 


At Home with the Holocaust

A scholarly exploration of children and grandchildren of Holocaust survivors

 

On March 11, 2025, Rutgers University Press released At Home with the Holocaust: Postmemory, Domestic Space, and Second-Generation Holocaust Narratives by Lucas F. W. Wilson, PhD. At Home is 188 pages long, inclusive of an index, end notes, and a bibliography. The book's goal is to analyze how children and grandchildren of Holocaust survivors are traumatized by their parents' and grandparents' experiences. The book focuses on how homes – that is, houses and geographic locations – can transmit trauma from one generation to the next.

 

In an online biography, author Wilson says, "I am the Justice, Equity, and Transformation Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Calgary." On a University of Calgary page, Wilson follows his name with "Pronouns: he/him/his." In an interview, Wilson says, "My work has largely centered on the Holocaust, but given the rise in anti-queer and anti-trans violence, public policy, and legislation, I redirected my attention on a main catalyst of homophobia and transphobia today: white Christian nationalism …  Both the Holocaust and conversion therapy are inextricably connected to Christianity … The Christian scriptures and Christian theology laid the seedbed for the Holocaust … Christianity has so easily lent itself to such hatred." Christians have "genocidal intentions" toward GLBT people, Jews, and "Indigenous folks in North America."

 

Wilson, though young, is an exceptionally successful scholar, enjoying a degree of financial support and accolades that most scholars can only dream of. "I have received several fellowships and awards for my work." An incomplete list of his honors: The Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi's Dissertation Fellowship; a European Holocaust Research Infrastructure Fellowship; The Rabbi Ferdinand Isserman Memorial Fellowship from the American Jewish Archives; a Regent Scholarship, two Edwin L. Stockton, Jr., Graduate Scholarships from Sigma Tau Delta International English Honor Society, an Auschwitz Jewish Center Fellowship, and a Zaglembier Society Scholarship awarded by The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies.

 

At Home with the Holocaust has received high praise. Scholar and author Victoria Aarons says that the book "makes a vital contribution to the research on second and third-generation Holocaust descendants and the complex ways in which traumatic memory is passed along intergenerationally." Alan L. Berger, the Raddock Family Eminent Scholar Chair in Holocaust Studies at Florida Atlantic University, says that At Home "breaks new ground."

 

I can see how At Home with the Holocaust meets the needs of a reader happily immersed and unquestioningly invested in academic trends in writing styles, thought processes, ideology, and ethics. I am not that reader. This book exemplifies serious problems in contemporary academia, as I will detail in the review, below. First, a word on why I care about this topic.

 

As soon as I saw the Rutgers University Press ad for this new book, I was eager to read it. I have been swimming in the water of post-World-War-Two trauma for my entire life. I'm a baby boomer, a drop in the post-World-War-II demographic surge. I didn't give it much thought in my childhood, but I was surrounded by post-war trauma.

 

On August 14, 1945, Life magazine photographer Alfred Eisenstaedt captured "V-J Day in Times Square." A sailor is kissing a young woman wearing a medical uniform – white dress, white stockings, white shoes. The photo expertly captures the ecstatic jubilation of the end of worldwide horror and atrocity.

Thursday, April 17, 2025

The Shroud of Turin. Is Seeing Believing?

 


The Shroud of Turin
 Is seeing believing?

 

A storm had been brewing for days. You could bite the air it was so thick. Sleep was impossible. Sweat was constant. Black, muscular clouds, bruised, crazed, ready to blow, beat down on us as if we were the head of a drum. My toes were sunk in the sand on the bank of the Wanaque River.

 

It came from the west, right over the river, emerging from thick and twisting thunderheads. It wasn't more substantial than air; it was the embodiment of air; it was animate sky; more air than air, more sky than sky. White and black, gleaming as a sunstruck cloud, sharp as a slicing wind. Swinging from left to right, seeking and gobbling its dragonfly prey. And that fast it was lost to my eyes downriver.

 

That was a swallow-tailed kite!

 

This Florida bird did not belong in New Jersey! Its exotic home was a thousand miles south, casting its shadow on earthbound alligators and colorful flowers.

 

Birders keep something called a "life list." We record every bird we've ever seen. For the past fifty years, alone in my room, no witnesses, I cannot bring myself to check the box opposite the words "swallow-tailed kite." I am stopped by the barrier between perceiving and accepting.  

 

The part of my brain that instantaneously assembles disparate details into a coherent whole and reports, "This is a chair; this is a table;" told me "This is a swallow-tailed kite." But bird-watching requires firing up the part of the brain that disassembles details and analyzes each. That part of my brain that would have consciously ticked off each detail – the snow white breast, the dipped-in-ink wings, a storm that may have tossed the bird off course – that part of my brain was not in gear. I was too awed by the whole to inspect the parts.

 

And it's more than that. Now that I'm an adult and I've lived away more years than I lived there, I can recognize that my hometown was special. We never locked the door; we were surrounded by neighbors we knew and woods full of deer and berries and spooky stories. But when I was a kid, my hometown felt like prison. Even as we kids enjoyed the woods, the sleepovers, the close, warm kitchens full of kielbasa and lasagna and paella, we yearned for anywhere else where everything, we were certain, was better. Such an elegant bird simply did not belong in the turbulent sky over the humble Wanaque River.  

 

In the 1986 horror film The Fly, a mad scientist tries to explain to his girlfriend that, thanks to an experiment gone wrong, he is turning into a fly. She says, "I don't get it."

 

He replies, "You get it. You just can't handle it."

 

A swallow-tailed kite in my factory-pocked hometown? I got it. I just couldn't handle it.

 

Over seventy years earlier, a world-class French scientist occupied that same rickety bridge between perceiving and accepting. Anatomist Yves Delage wrote of his "obsession" with a "disconcerting contradiction between" a mind-blowing artifact and the "impossibility to find a natural explanation" for that artifact.

 

Moi aussi, Yves. Like you, that's how I have long felt about the Shroud of Turin.